CCCS-203b Dumps With Exact Questions and Answers

According to CrowdStrike Falcon documentation regardingFalcon Cloud Security (FCS)andContainer Security, the method used to deploy sensors significantly impacts how updates are managed. When Linux hosts are part of a Kubernetes cluster and the Falcon sensor is deployed as aDaemonSet, the standard "Sensor Update Policy" configured in the Falcon Console does not automatically trigger a version change in the same way it does for a standard Windows or Linux workstation.

In aDaemonSet deployment, the sensor version is typically tied to the specificcontainer image tagor the version defined in theHelm chartor YAML manifest used during deployment. If the manifest specifies a static version or if the orchestration layer (Kubernetes) is not instructed to pull a newer image and rollout a restart of the DaemonSet pods, the hosts will remain on their current version regardless of the "n-2" policy set in the console.

Furthermore, CrowdStrike documentation notes that forLinux Sensor Update Policies, the "n-2" setting dictates which version isassignedto the host, but the mechanism of delivery must be supported. In containerized environments, the "Auto-update" feature is often bypassed by the immutable nature of the deployment. To resolve this, the administrator must update the DaemonSet configuration to point to the newer sensor image, allowing Kubernetes to perform a rolling update across the nodes.

TheCloud Asset InventoryinCrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Securityprovides a centralized, normalized view ofall compute assetsacrossAWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, regardless of whether they aremanaged or unmanagedby the Falcon sensor.

This inventory aggregates metadata from cloud provider APIs and Falcon telemetry to present unified visibility into virtual machines, cloud instances, container hosts, and workloads. Security teams can filter assets by cloud provider, account, region, operating system, sensor status, and risk posture, making it essential for multi-cloud environments.

Other dashboards serve specialized purposes: the Image Assessment Dashboard focuses on container images, the Compliance Dashboard maps findings to regulatory frameworks, and Application Security Posture Inventory focuses on application-level risk. None of these provide thefull compute asset viewrequired for cross-cloud operational awareness.

Therefore,Cloud Asset Inventoryis the correct location for maintaining visibility across complex, multi-cloud environments.

When investigating widespread Indicators of Misconfiguration (IOMs) such as Azure MFA not being enforced, CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security provides deeper investigative context through Event Search and Asset Graph. These two capabilities work together to move beyond a high-level finding count and into actionable insight.

Event Search allows analysts to query cloud control plane activity and identity-related events to understand how authentication policies are configured, modified, or bypassed over time. This helps determine whether MFA gaps are due to legacy configurations, recent changes, or specific identities or services.

Asset Graph provides a visual and relational view of cloud identities, subscriptions, roles, and permissions. It enables analysts to see which users, service principals, or resources are affected by missing MFA enforcement and how they are connected across the environment.

The other options do not provide the same depth of investigation. Identity & Cloud Group is primarily used for scoping visibility, while CloudTrail logging is AWS-specific and not applicable to Azure MFA findings. Therefore, the correct answer is Event search & Asset graph.