Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation
The correct solution is Option A. The key to this question is that the vulnerability is a zero-day (the CVE is not yet released). Therefore, you cannot hunt for known signatures, and tools that rely on public intelligence are useless. The only way to find it is to hunt for the behavior or TTPs (Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures) of its exploitation.
A critical XSS attack can often be used to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE). The logical TTP for this would be:
An external inbound connection to the web server (the exploit delivery).
This connection causes the web server process to spawn a new subprocess (the payload, e.g., a reverse shell, whoami, or powershell.exe).
Option A perfectly describes a behavioral YARA-L rule to detect this exact time-ordered series of events. By correlating an inbound NETWORK_CONNECTION with a subsequent PROCESS_LAUNCH from the same server and checking if that process is anomalous ("previously not seen"), you are effectively hunting for the post-exploitation behavior.
Option B is incorrect: WSS is a vulnerability scanner that looks for known classes of vulnerabilities. It will not find a specific, unknown zero-day.
Option C is incorrect: Gemini relies on public threat intelligence. If the CVE is not released, Gemini will not know about the vulnerability.
Option D is incorrect: This is a generic C2 detection and is less specific than Option A. An exploit would also likely use low-prevalence or unusual binaries, not "high-prevalence" ones.
Exact Extract from Google Security Operations Documents:
YARA-L 2.0 language overview: YARA-L 2.0 is a computer language used to create rules for searching through your enterprise log data... A typical multiple event rule will have the following: A match section which specifies the time range over which events need to be grouped. A condition section specifying what condition should trigger the detection and checking for the existence of multiple events.
This allows an analyst to hunt for specific TTPs by correlating a time-ordered series of events. For example, a rule can be written to join a NETWORK_CONNECTION event (e.g., an external inbound connection) with a subsequent PROCESS_LAUNCH event on the same host... By enriching this with entity context, the detection can be scoped to trigger only when the spawned process is anomalous or previously not seen in the environment, indicating a likely post-exploitation activity, such as a web shell or remote code execution resulting from an exploit.
[References:, Google Cloud Documentation: Google Security Operations > Documentation > Detections > Overview of the YARA-L 2.0 language, Google Cloud Documentation: Google Security Operations > Documentation > Detections > Context-aware analytics, ]
