Copado-Developer Copado Developer Certification Exam exact Exam Questions

Copado Developer Certification Exam

Last Update 5 hours ago Total Questions : 84

The Copado Developer Certification Exam content is now fully updated, with all current exam questions added 5 hours ago. Deciding to include Copado-Developer practice exam questions in your study plan goes far beyond basic test preparation.

You'll find that our Copado-Developer exam questions frequently feature detailed scenarios and practical problem-solving exercises that directly mirror industry challenges. Engaging with these Copado-Developer sample sets allows you to effectively manage your time and pace yourself, giving you the ability to finish any Copado Developer Certification Exam practice test comfortably within the allotted time.

Question # 1

Debbie comitted some changes to the Opportunity Layout but, after deploying her changes from DEV

to INT, she found her changes were not there due to an auto-resolved Git conflict she was not aware

of. How can she prevent this from happening again in all future promotions?

Manually promote and add Layout to the Exclude From Auto Resolve multi-select picklist field in the Promotion record.

Remove Layout from the Exclude From Auto Resolve multi-select picklist field in the Pipeline record.

Manually promote and remove Layout from the Exclude From Auto Resolve multi-select picklist field in the Promotion record.

Add Layout to the Exclude From Auto Resolve multi-select picklist field in the Pipeline record

Question # 2

Which is TRUE about Static Code Analysis using CodeScan?

You don ' t need to have a CodeScan account.

CodeScan is only recommended to check Apex classes.

You need to create Static Code Analysis Settings with CodeScan record type.

All are correct

Question # 3

Rob, would like to enforce the following quality gates when deploying to INT:

* A static code analysis for all Apex classes and triggers.

* A validation deployment for all Apex classes and triggers.

* A validation deployment for profiles.

What is the easiest way for him to address these requirements?

He needs to set up 1 connection behavior in INT with 2 quality gates, a Static Code Analysis for Apex classes and triggers and a validation for profiles and for Apex classes and triggers.

He needs to set up 1 connection behavior in DEV with 3 quality gates, one Static Code Analysis for Apex classes and triggers, one validation for Apex classes and triggers and one validation for profiles.

He needs to set up 3 connection behaviors in INT, one for the Static Code Analysis, one for the validation of Apex classes and triggers and one for the validation of profiles.

He needs to set up 2 connection behaviors in INT, one for the Static Code Analysis and one for the validation.

Question # 4

Which IS TRUE about Static Code Analysis using Code Scan?

The rule set includes built-in rule records.

The score is calculated by subtracting the selected rule priority from 5.

You can review the violations from the Static Code Analysis Result related list on the User Story record.

You can generate a default rule set from Copado.

Question # 5

After deleting the component in Dev1, Dave has accidentally refreshed the metadata index. What can

he do now in order to perform a destructive changes commit of the component? Select all that apply!

He can recreate the component in Dev 1 and refresh the metadata index again.

He can use the Org Credential lookup field in the Commit Changes page and find the component in another org.

He can the Add Row button in the Commit Changes page and add the API name of the component.

He can edit the metadata attachment on the user story and add the component.

Question # 6

You have work in progress in dev1. After retrieving from the org and pushing a hotfix for your Admin

profile from the Copado CLI, the validation deployment is failing. Why?

The CLI push creates a deployment that includes the nested components in the profile file without including dependencies to work in progress.

Copado has auto-resolved the Git conflict in the profile with changes that are not available in the feature branch.

Copado has auto-resolved the Git conflict in the profile with changes that are not available in the source environment.

While pushing your changes from the CLI, Copado deploys the complete profile file which could contain references to other work in progress in dev1.

Question # 7

Your company has multiple developers working in separate environments and sometimes your Apex

classes get overwritten. What can you do to prevent this?

Activate Online Conflict Resolution feature by removing Apex classes from the Exclude From Auto Resolve field in the Promotion record.

Activate the Online Conflict Resolution feature by removing Apex classes from the Exclude From Auto Resolve field in the Pipeline record

Activate the Online Conflict Resolution feature by including Apex classes in the Exclude From Auto Resolve field in the Pipeline record

Create a validation rule to prevent the same Apex component from being committed in different environments.

Question # 8

In Dev1, Debbie has added a new method to an Apex class. She has committed the user story and

deployed the user story to UAT. In Dev2, Dave has added a method to the same class and has

deployed the changes to UAT. This has reported a conflict, so Dave has teamed up with Debbie and

resolved it manually. What happens when the user stories are moved to the next environment?

The conflict is reported again but just as a warning. They can deploy.

There is no Git conflict since Copado has already stored the solution to the conflict.

No conflict is reported. Copado uses the auto-resolve conflict resolution feature to apply the changes from the latest deployment to the Apex class.

The conflict is reported again and they need to fix it manually in order to be able to deploy.

Question # 9

Debbie has created a new custom field in Dev1. She commits it on a user story together with the permission set to deploy FLS. After committing the changes, she realizes she forgot to grant the permission set access to the field in Dev1, so she goes back to Dev1 and updates the FLS. What is the easiest way to ensure the FLS is deployed to the next environment together with the field?

She can go back to the user story where she committed the changes and use the Recommit Files Git operation.

She needs to create a new user story and commit again the permission set.

She needs to delete the user story, create a new one and commit again the field and the permission set.

She needs to create a new user story and commit again the custom field.

Question # 10

The development team is complaining that when they try to select a metadata source in the scratch org wizard, they can only see Branches. Developers should be able to select

any metadata source. How you can fix this?

Set the Copado DX Mode picklist field in the Pipeline record to ' All Metadata Sources ' .

Set the Copado DX Mode picklist field to ' Branches ' in all the environments.

Give the developer profile the correct object level permissions to all metadata sources.

Set the Copado DX Mode picklist field in the Pipeline record to ' None ' .