Construction-Manager Dumps With Exact Questions and Answers

In the BIM domain,clash detectionis the process by which software analyses models to findgeometric interferences—i.e. overlapping or intersecting volumes between different building elements or systems. This method helps reveal conflicts in the spatial design (for example, a pipe intersecting a beam) before construction, thus avoiding costly corrections in the field.

None of the other options specifically address the detection of intersecting volumes:

BIM Integrationrefers to the combining of different discipline models into a shared environment, not necessarily the conflict checking itself.

Parametric Modelingis a method of defining model geometry through parameters and rules, but does not inherently detect clashes.

Virtual Design and Construction (VDC)is a broader process of using digital modeling and simulation across the design/construction lifecycle; clash detection is a component of it, but the specific method for interference checking is “clash detection.”

Value Engineering (VE) is intended to improve value by optimizing the relationship between function, cost, and life-cycle performance. The CM would emphasize that VE is amulti-discipline reviewof project functions and alternate design solutions to reduce cost without sacrificing essential performance. In a proper VE workshop, participants from multiple disciplines review function, identify alternatives, and propose changes.

The incorrect choices are:

A is wrong because life cycle and maintenance costsshouldbe considered — VE should look beyond initial cost to long-term costs.

C is simplistic: while scope reduction is one possible result, VE is not merely scope cutting but exploring alternatives to maintain functionality at lower cost.

D is incorrect, because interfacing with the design-build team is essential — VE must involve the DB team to ensure proposed changes are implementable and integrated.

According to theCMAA Standards of Practicein theRisk Managementsection, risk quantification often uses formulas combiningprobability (P)andimpact factorssuch asCost (C),Time (T), andQuality (Q)to compute anoverall risk score.

The CMAA explains:

“Risk scoring combines the likelihood (probability) of occurrence with the magnitude of its potential impact across cost, time, and quality metrics. The resultant value represents the overall risk score used for prioritization in the risk register.”

The given formula aligns directly with that concept — it mathematically expresses aweighted overall risk score, not a simulation or isolated variable measure. AMonte Carlo simulationis a separate probabilistic modeling technique, not a single-score formula.