Thejavax.jcr.PathNotFoundExceptionin this case indicates that the path to the asset /content/dam/projectA/asset.jpg cannot be found. The most likely cause is that the asset does not exist at the specified location, and thus the AssetManager is unable to copy it.

PathNotFoundException: This exception is thrown when the repository path (in this case, the asset path) is not found in the JCR repository, meaning that the asset does not exist or the path is incorrect.

Other possibilities like permissions issues (Option C) would typically result in aPermissionDeniedException, and Option B is incorrect because the issue specifically pertains to the asset path, not the parent folder.

To resolve this, the developer should check if the asset exists at the specified path or if the path is misspelled. For more information, refer to theAEM documentation on handling assets and JCR path exceptions.

When a new metadata profile is applied to a folder in AEM, itonly affects new assetsadded to that folderafterthe profile is applied. Existing assets that were already in the folder or subfolders prior to the profile being assigned will retain the metadata profile that was previously applied.

To update the metadata of existing assets with the new profile, you would need to either manually update the assets or run a script to reapply the metadata profile to those assets.

Option B is incorrect because the profile applies to all assets in the folder, not just direct children. Option C is incorrect because if there were invalid field values, you would likely see an error or warning, rather than a silent failure.

For more details, refer to AEM’sdocumentation on managing and applying metadata profiles.

In this case, the organization wants to prevent users from selecting print media options for new entries while still displaying historical data in reports. The best way to achieve this is tohide the print choicesin the dropdown field. This approach ensures that:

Historical data remains unaffected: Since you are only hiding the options and not removing them, existing records with those print media values will continue to display in reports and other views.

No selection of new print options: By hiding these options, users will no longer be able to select them for new records, effectively preventing any further print media classifications.

Removing the print options (Option B) would delete historical data associated with them, which is not desirable for reporting. Moving them to the end of the list (Option C) doesn't restrict users from selecting them, which does not meet the objective of focusing solely on digital work.

This practice aligns with Adobe Workfront's best practices for managing dropdown fields, where options can be hidden but not removed, thus preserving the integrity of historical data while controlling future input.

For more details, refer to theCustom Fieldssection in Workfront's documentation, specifically around managing dropdown options and preserving historical data visibility in reports.

When converting a request to a project in Adobe Workfront, it's important to ensure that custom fields and their values are correctly passed from the request form to the project form. To achieve this, you need to add the same custom field on the project form, but in this case, the calculation should be left blank because the calculated value from the request form will be passed over and does not need to be recalculated at the project level.

Same field: The field needs to be exactly the same (same internal name) so the data can flow between the request and the project during the conversion.

Blank calculation: By leaving the calculation blank, you ensure that the field will accept the value from the request without overriding it or attempting to recalculate it.

For more details on setting up custom forms in Workfront and handling calculated fields during request-to-project conversions, refer to theAdobe Workfront Form Customization Guide.

The issue of the custom field not displaying correctly on a component is likely because thenamespace 'myProject'is not registered in AEM. AEM requires that custom namespaces be registered before they can be used for storing metadata properties. Without registering the myProject namespace, the system cannot properly recognize the custom property, leading to issues displaying the value.

Namespace registration: Custom namespaces like myProject need to be defined in AEM before they can be used to store properties.

Option A is incorrect because the text field should accept special characters, and Option B is incorrect unless there is already a conflicting property name, which is not indicated in this scenario.

Refer toAEM documentation on namespace registrationfor steps on how to register a custom namespace in AEM.

To configure the Enhanced Connector in AEM, including features like automatic project-linked folder creation, comment syncing, and automatic publishing of assets, you should navigate to:

Tools > Workfront Tools > Workfront Tools Configuration: This is where you can access and configure the connector settings within AEM. From there, selecting the configuration and choosingPropertiesin the action bar allows you to adjust the required settings.

Options B and C reference incorrect paths (Cloud Services and Assets), which are not used for the Enhanced Connector configuration.

Refer toAEM’s Enhanced Connector documentationfor step-by-step instructions on accessing and configuring the connector.

In this scenario, the reviewer needs to leave comments on an interactive web content URL and tag the designer. TheWeb Proofing vieweris the appropriate tool for reviewing interactive web content in Adobe Workfront. The Web Proofing viewer allows users to:

Review and commenton web-based content directly in the browser.

Tag usersin comments and updates.

Approve or rejectthe content with the necessary feedback.

Option A (Desktop Proofing viewer) is typically used for offline or downloadable content, and Option C (Legacy Proofing viewer) refers to an outdated tool that lacks modern proofing functionalities.

Refer toWorkfront’s proofing documentationfor more information on using the Web Proofing viewer for interactive content.