Risk culture refers to the attitudes, behaviors, and mindsets that influence how risk is perceived, managed, and integrated into decision-making.

Analyzing Risk Culture:

Involves assessing the workforce’s perceptions of risk and its role in daily operations.

Focuses on how risk-related decisions are made and how the workforce understands and mitigates risk impact.

Integration with Decision-Making:

A strong risk culture ensures that risk considerations are embedded in strategic and operational decisions.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A: Individual comfort levels are only a small aspect of risk culture.

B: Talent attraction and retention are related to workforce culture, not risk culture.

C: Risk appetite and tolerance are strategic metrics, not part of the cultural assessment process.

Effective objectives in the context of GRC should meet the SMART criteria:

Specific: Clearly define the goal to eliminate ambiguity.

Measurable: Include metrics or indicators to track progress and success.

Achievable: The objective should be realistic and attainable, given the available resources and constraints.

Relevant: Ensure the objective aligns with the organization’s strategic priorities and risk tolerance.

Timebound: Define a specific timeframe to achieve the objective, ensuring accountability.

Why Option B is Correct:

The SMART criteria provide a framework for setting objectives that are actionable and aligned with organizational goals.

Financial metrics alone (Option A) or singular timescales (Option C) are insufficient for evaluating overall effectiveness.

Objectives must not only align with stakeholder preferences (Option D) but also fulfill strategic and operational needs.

Relevant Frameworks and Guidelines:

COSO ERM Framework: Stresses the importance of aligning objectives with strategic goals and risk management practices.

ISO 31000 (Risk Management): Recommends setting clear, measurable objectives for effective risk treatment and monitoring.

In summary, the SMART criteria ensure that objectives are actionable, measurable, and aligned with the organization’s goals, making them an integral part of effective GRC practices.

Leading indicators and lagging indicators are performance measurement tools used to assess organizational progress and outcomes.

Leading Indicators:

Provide information about future events or conditions.

Help predict trends and allow proactive adjustments.

Example: Employee training completion rates predicting future performance improvements.

Lagging Indicators:

Reflect past events or conditions.

Measure results and outcomes after processes are completed.

Example: Customer satisfaction scores based on previous interactions.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A: Not related to leadership input or exit interviews.

B: Leading and lagging indicators can encompass both financial and non-financial metrics.

C: Both types of indicators may include quantitative and qualitative measures.

Correct/Recover Actions & Controls in the IACM focus on responding to adverse events by minimizing their impact and restoring normal operations.

Key Points About Correct/Recover Actions & Controls:

Purpose:

These controls aim to reduce the harm caused by unfavorable events and ensure a swift recovery to stability or an improved state.

Examples include incident response plans, disaster recovery measures, and corrective action processes.

Alignment with Risk Management:

Corrective and recovery actions are critical components of frameworks like NIST CSF and ISO 22301 (Business Continuity Management), which emphasize post-incident recovery.

Why Option B is Correct:

The role of Correct/Recover Actions & Controls is to decrease the impact of unfavorable events and restore the organization to its original or improved state after an incident.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:

A: Damage assessment is part of the recovery process but does not fully capture the role of Correct/Recover actions.

C: Adherence to the code of conduct falls under compliance, not recovery controls.

D: Preventing impact on profitability is not always possible; the focus is on recovery, not prevention.

References and Resources:

ISO 22301:2019 – Business Continuity Management Systems.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) – Focuses on corrective and recovery actions.

COSO ERM Framework – Highlights recovery as part of the risk response process.

A prescriptive policy tells people and the organization what they must do—it prescribes required actions or behaviors. This is distinct from a proscriptive policy, which focuses on what is prohibited (“must not do”). In governance and compliance programs, prescriptive policies are used to establish mandatory practices such as access approvals, incident reporting steps, required reviews, data handling requirements, or minimum security configurations. They support consistent execution, accountability, and auditability by making expectations explicit and measurable. A procedural policy can include step-by-step processes, but “procedures” are typically subordinate artifacts that operationalize policy; the question is asking the policy type that provides instructions on actions to be taken, which aligns most directly with the prescriptive/proscriptive distinction. Ethical conduct policies set behavioral expectations and principles, but they are not the general classification for “instructions on what actions should be taken.” Therefore, option A is the best fit: it reflects the standard GRC taxonomy where prescriptive = required actions.

The mission and vision of an organization serve distinct but complementary purposes:

Mission:

Defines the organization's purpose, direction, and core values.

Answers: “Why do we exist?”

Example: “To provide sustainable energy solutions to underserved markets.”

Vision:

Represents an aspirational future state the organization strives to achieve.

Answers: “What do we aspire to become?”

Example: “To be the world’s leading renewable energy provider.”

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

B: Both mission and vision involve internal input and stakeholder considerations.

C: Mission and vision are broader than financial goals.

D: Both mission and vision are relevant for all types of organizations.