Giving positive group and individual feedback is easy, as is self-congratulation and, in many cases, it is hoped, this will be an accurate reflection on actual performance. When it comes to developmental or difficult feedback, it is only natural to want to move on and not reflect on the negative or developmental points, or why a negotiation did not achieve its objectives. But this is a mistake. The best learning opportunities come from reflection on what could be done better, and this can be achieved without blame, threat or condemnation. Everyone and every team will make mistakes and/or have areas where they could have improved. Clearly, if every reflection session concludes that an individual or team keeps making the same mistake, then there is a case to change roles or consider alternative approaches.

About Dos and Don'ts of reflection, you can refer here: https://offices.depaul.edu/human-resources/employee-relations/Documents/Self%20Assesement.pdf

Framing and re-framing (C) and Anchoring (E) are powerful influencing techniques:

Framing and re-framing (C): This technique shapes how information is presented to make specific aspects more compelling or relevant.

Anchoring (E): Anchoring sets an initial reference point, which influences how subsequent information is perceived.

These techniques help negotiators control the flow and focus of discussions, aligning with CIPS recommendations for strategic influence in negotiations.

Hypothetical questionsare used to explore scenarios or options without making a commitment. For example, asking "What if we were to increase the order volume?" encourages creative thinking and testing potential agreements without binding either party. This technique is valuable in theproposing and bargaining stagesof negotiation to explore trade-offs and build mutual solutions.

The relationship spectrum categorizes supplier relationships based on factors like strategic importance, allowing organizations to tailor their approach to each supplier relationship. CIPS emphasizes the relationship spectrum as a valuable tool for assessing and managing supplier interactions based on strategic relevance.

Mark-upis calculated as:

Mark-up %=(ProfitCost)×100\text{Mark-up \%} = \left( \frac{\text{Profit}}{\text{Cost}} \right) \times 100Mark-up %=(CostProfit​)×100

In this case:

Profit = $240 - $160 = $80

Cost = $160

Mark-up = (80 / 160) × 100 =50%

“Understanding mark-up percentages helps in assessing supplier pricing behaviour and negotiating realistic margins.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Pricing Models and Profit Margins)