Employer-provided parking is often a taxable benefit, generally valued at the fair market value of the parking spot. However, the CRA provides a specific exception for employees with disabilities. CRA guidance on employer-provided parking states that if your employee has a disability, the parking benefit is generally not taxable, including situations involving a severe and prolonged mobility impairment or blindness.

In Steve’s case, the fact pattern explicitly says he is physically disabled and the employer pays for his parking. Under CRA’s general rule for disability-related parking, this would generally not be included in income as a taxable benefit, meaning it is not a taxable allowance and not a taxable benefit (cash or non-cash) for payroll purposes.

Payroll should still document why the parking is being treated as non-taxable (for example, disability-related need) and ensure the treatment aligns with CRA guidance if questioned. If the facts were different (non-disability parking or preferential parking provided to employees generally), the taxable benefit rules would usually apply.

The CRA defines a benefit as something the employee receives when the employer pays for or gives something that is personal in nature (a good or service), either directly to the employee or through a third party. CRA’s T4130 guide describes a benefit as a good or service you give (or arrange for) such as free use of employer property, and it is the value of that benefit that may need to be included in the employee’s income if taxable.

This matches the wording in the question: “dollar values attributed to something the employer has either provided…or paid for…on an employee’s behalf.” By contrast, earnings are pay for work performed (salary, wages, commissions). Allowances are fixed amounts paid to help cover anticipated expenses without receipts (often taxable unless an exception applies). Expense reimbursements repay actual business expenses (typically supported by receipts) and are generally not treated as earnings.

So the correct classification is Benefits.

A strong hire-authorization/onboarding checklist ensures payroll and HR collect documents needed to pay the employee accurately and enroll them in required programs. Abenefit enrollment formis a practical, common checklist item because many employers offer benefit plans that require employee elections (for example, health/dental coverage levels, beneficiary information, dependent details, etc.). Indeed’s Canadian onboarding guidance explicitly notes employers often collectbenefits enrollmentpaperwork as part of essential new employee forms and onboarding checklists.

By contrast, aT1213(Request to Reduce Tax Deductions at Source) is not routinely required for all hires; it is only used when an employee applies for CRA authorization to reduce tax withheld. A “clearance certificate” is not a standard Canada-wide payroll onboarding requirement for typical employment relationships. Therefore, “All of the above” is not correct.

Selectingbenefit enrollment formbest matches the purpose of a hiring authorization checklist: ensuring all employment setup steps are completed (pay setup, statutory forms, and benefits enrollment where offered) so payroll deductions and coverage are handled correctly from the start.

Payroll deductions are typically applied in a priority order to ensure the employer meets mandatory legal obligations first and avoids creating liability. Standard Canadian payroll training materials commonly present five categories withheld in this order: (1) statutory deductions, (2) legal deductions, (3) union deductions, (4) company-compulsory deductions, and (5) voluntary deductions.

Statutory deductions (CPP/QPP, EI, income tax, and where applicable NWT/Nunavut payroll tax) have top priority because employers are legally required to deduct and remit them.

Legal deductions (such as CRA requirements to pay/garnishments) are next because they are enforced by law and can create employer liability if not followed.

Union deductions follow where required by a collective agreement.

Company-compulsory deductions (for example, required benefit premiums) come after those.

Voluntary deductions (charity, savings plans, etc.) are last and only taken if funds remain.

Therefore, option D is the correct order.

CRA’s method for bonus/irregular payments paid separately is to calculate income tax on the combined pay (regular pay + the irregular payment) using the regular tax tables, then subtract the tax that would apply to the regular pay alone. The difference is the income tax to withhold from the irregular payment.

Here, the semi-monthly taxable pay is:

Regular pay = $1,800.00

Regular + vacation payout = $3,200.00

Using the 2026 Alberta semi-monthly (24 pay periods) tax tables with claim code 1:

At $1,800, Federal tax = $130.45 and Alberta tax = $58.55 → Total = $189.00.

At $3,200, Federal tax = $356.50 and Alberta tax = $174.00 → Total = $530.50.

Income tax on the vacation payout = $530.50 − $189.00 = $341.50.

CPP (including the enhanced portion) is a separate statutory deduction that must also be calculated on the payout, but this question asked specifically for income tax withholding.

In a Defined Contribution (DC) pension plan, contributions are calculated as a set percentage of the employee’s pensionable earnings, and the total remittance is usually the sum of the employee deduction plus the employer’s matching contribution, based on the plan text. Here, the plan states the employee contributes 3% of pensionable earnings, and the employer matches the employee contribution.

Step 1: Calculate the employee’s pension contribution:

3% × $3,400.00 = 0.03 × 3,400.00 = $102.00.

Step 2: Calculate the employer match:

Because the employer matches the employee contribution, the employer contributes $102.00 as well.

Step 3: Total remittance to the plan:

$102.00 (employee) + $102.00 (employer) = $204.00 each month.

From a payroll processing perspective, the employee amount is withheld from gross pay as a payroll deduction according to plan rules, while the employer match is recorded as an employer expense. Payroll remits both amounts to the plan administrator following the plan’s remittance schedule, and should reconcile pensionable earnings and contributions to ensure accuracy and compliance with plan terms.

For CRA automobile benefit purposes (standby charge on an employer-owned automobile), the “cost” used is the capital cost, which includes more than just the sticker price. CRA guidance states the cost includes the trade-in amount (if applicable), additions, and GST/HST and PST as part of the cost base used in the standby charge calculation.

Option D is the best match because it includes vehicle options/accessories, sales taxes, and additions that add to depreciation value. Importantly, CRA also notes that certain specialized equipment added to meet the requirements of a disabled person or employment (examples include heavy-duty suspension and power winches) is not considered part of the automobile’s cost for standby charge purposes. This directly rules out options A and C, since they treat specialized equipment as part of capital cost. Option B is incorrect because CRA includes sales taxes (GST/HST and PST) in the cost base.