ForEinstein Sales Emailsto generate personalized follow-up emails, it is crucial to ground the email content with the most up-to-date and accurate information. Grounding refers to connecting the AI model with real-time data. The most appropriate technique in this case isGround with Record Merge Fields. This method ensures that the content in the emails pulls dynamic and accurate data directly from Salesforce records, such as lead or contact information, ensuring the follow-up is relevant and customized based on the specific record.

Record Merge Fieldsensure the generated emails are highly personalized using data like lead name, company, or other Salesforce fields directly from the records.

Apex Merge Fieldsare typically more suited for advanced, custom logic-driven scenarios but are not the most straightforward for this use case.

Automatic grounding using Draft with Einsteinis a different feature where Einstein automatically drafts the email, but it does not specifically ground the content with record-specific data likeRecord Merge Fields.

References:

Salesforce Einstein Sales Emails Documentation:https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=release-notes.rn_einstein_sales_emails.htm

When generating a Work Summary, Einstein leverages multiple sources of information to provide a comprehensive and accurate case summary for agents.

Conversation Context:

Einstein analyzes the details of the customer interaction, including chat or email threads, to extract relevant information for the summary.

Knowledge Articles:

It considers linked Knowledge Articles or articles referred to during the case resolution process, ensuring the summary incorporates accurate resolutions or additional resources provided to the customer.

Cases:

Einstein also examines historical cases and related case records to ground the summary in context from past resolutions or interactions.

Option Ais correct as it includes all three: conversation context, Knowledge articles, and cases.

Option Bis incorrect because it limits the grounding to conversation context only, excluding other critical elements.

Option Cis incorrect because it omits case data, which Einstein considers for more accurate and contextually rich summaries.

Context of the Question

Universal Containers (UC) has a strict change management process that requires all possible configuration be completed in a sandbox and deployed to Production.

Einstein Generative AI is already enabled in Production, and the “Einstein Work Summaries” permission set is already available in Production.

The AI Specialist needs to configureWork Summaries for Enhanced Messagingin the sandbox.

What Can Actually Be Deployed from Sandbox to Production?

Custom Fields: Metadata that is easily created in sandbox and then deployed.

Quick Actions: Also metadata-based and can be deployed from sandbox to production.

Layout Components: Page layout changes (such as adding the Wrap Up component) can be added to a change set or deployment package.

Why Option C is Correct

No Need to Turn on Einstein in Sandbox for Deployment: Einstein Generative AI is already enabled in Production; turning it on in the sandbox is typically a manual step if you want to test, but that step itself is not “deployable” in the sense of metadata.

Permission Set Assignments(as in Option A) are not deployable metadata. You can deploy the Permission Set itself but not the specific user assignments. Since the question specifically asks “Which other configuration steps should be takenin the sandboxthatcanbe deployed to the production org?”, user assignment is not one of them.

Why Not Option A or B?

Option A: Mentions creating permission set assignments for agents. This cannot be directly deployed from sandbox to Production, as permission set assignments are user-specific and considered “data,” not metadata.

Option B: Mentions “Turn on Einstein.” But Einstein Generative AI is already enabled in Production. Additionally, “Turning on Einstein” is typically an org-level setting, not a deployable metadata item.

ConclusionThe main deployable items you can reliably create and test in a sandbox, and then migrate to Production, are:

Custom Fields(Issue, Resolution, Summary).

A Quick Actionthat updates those fields.

Page Layout Changeto include the Wrap Up component.

Therefore,Option Cis correct and focuses on actions that are truly deployable as metadata from a sandbox to Production.

Salesforce AI Specialist References & Documents

Salesforce Trailhead:Work Summaries with Einstein GPTProvides an overview of how to configure Work Summaries, including the need for custom fields, quick actions, and UI components.

Salesforce Documentation:Deploying Metadata Between OrgsExplains what can and cannot be deployed via change sets (e.g., custom fields, page layouts, quick actions vs. user permission set assignments).

Salesforce AI Specialist Study GuideOutlines which Einstein Generative AI and Work Summaries configurations are deployable as metadata.

Prompt Builderis designed to help organizations create and configure reusable prompts for large language models (LLMs). By integratinggenerative AIresponses into workflows,Prompt Builderenables customization of AI prompts that interact with Salesforce data and automate complex processes. This tool is especially useful for creating tailored and consistent AI-generated content in various business contexts, including customer service and sales.

It is not a tool forApex programming(as in option A).

It is also not limited to real-time suggestions as mentioned in option C. Instead, it provides a flexible way for companies to manage and customize how AI-driven responses are generated and used in their workflows.

References:

Salesforce Prompt Builder Overview:https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.prompt_builder.htm

The correct answer isField Generationbecause this template type is designed to dynamically populate form fields with content generated by a large language model (LLM). In this scenario, leadership wants a dynamic form field that contains a summary or description generated by AI to aid customer interactions. Additionally, they want to keep a human in the loop, meaning the generated content will likely be reviewed or edited by a person before it's finalized, which aligns with theField Generationprompt template.

Field Generation: This prompt type allows you to generate content for specific fields in Salesforce, leveraging large language models to create dynamic and contextual information. It ensures that AI content is available within the record where needed, but it allows human oversight or review, supporting the "human-in-the-loop" strategy.

Sales Email: This prompt type is mainly used for generating email content for outreach or responses, which doesn't align directly with populating fields in a form.

Record Summary: While this option might seem close, it is typically used to summarize entire records for high-level insights rather than filling specific fields with dynamic content based on AI generation.

Salesforce AI Specialist References:

You can explore more about these prompt templates and AI capabilities through Salesforce documentation and official resources on Prompt Builder:https://help.salesforce.com/s/articleView?id=sf.prompt_builder_templates_overview.htm

When using related list merge fields in a prompt template associated with the Account object inPrompt Builder, theActivities related listis not supported due to it being apolymorphic field. Polymorphic fields can reference multiple different types of objects, which makes them incompatible with some merge field operations in prompt generation.

Option Bis incorrect because person accounts do not limit the availability of merge fields for the Account object.

Option Cis irrelevant since even if no related lists are available at runtime, the prompt can still generate based on other available data fields.

For more information, refer toSalesforce documentationon supported fields and limitations inPrompt Builder.

Context of the QuestionUniversal Containers (UC) wants to automatically populate the Description field on the Account object. The AI-driven solution must generate textual data and write it directly into a field.

Field Generation Prompt Template

Primary Use Case: A Field Generation prompt template is specifically designed to create or fill in fields on a record with AI-generated text.

Auto-population: By configuring a Field Generation prompt template, admins can define the instructions, data inputs, and desired output for the AI. The resulting text then populates the specified field, such as the Account Description.

Why Not Flex or Sales Email Prompt Templates?

Flex Prompt Template: Used to combine or manipulate data across objects, merges, or references from multiple sources in more advanced, flexible prompts. Typically not the go-to for straightforward text generation on a single field.

Sales Email Prompt Template: Focused on drafting or summarizing emails for sales reps (like crafting outreach or follow-up messages). This template is not specifically built to populate a field on a record.

ConclusionFor automatically populating the Description field with AI-generated content, theField Generation prompt template(Option A) is the correct choice.

Salesforce AI Specialist References & Documents

Salesforce Documentation:Prompt Template TypesExplains various template types (Field Generation, Flex, Email, etc.) and their typical use cases.

Salesforce AI Specialist Study GuideHighlights Field Generation prompt templates for populating or updating record fields with AI-generated text.