Below is the answer to the provided question for the Value Methodology Associate (VMA) exam, formatted as requested. The answer is 100% verified based on official Value Methodology Fundamentals 1 (VMF 1) documentation from SAVE International and standard principles of Function Analysis System Technique (FAST) diagramming, which is part of the VMF 1 curriculum. Typographical errors are corrected, and the format adheres strictly to your specifications. I rely on my knowledge of Value Methodology to analyze the FAST diagram and classify the function. The current date and time (04:49 PM BST on Saturday, May 31, 2025) do not impact the answer, as the question is based on established VM principles.

The Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, as outlined in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan), is a structured sequence of six phases designed to leverage bothdivergentandconvergentthinking. According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “the VM Job Plan alternates between divergent thinking (to generate a wide range of ideas) and convergent thinking (to narrow down and refine those ideas).” Divergent thinking is used in the Creative Phase to brainstorm as many ideas as possible without judgment, while convergent thinking is applied in the Evaluation and Development Phases to analyze, select, and refine the best ideas into actionable proposals. This combination ensures a balance between creativity and practicality, maximizing value improvement.

Option A (Divergent and abstract) is incorrect because, while divergent thinking is used, “abstract” is not a specific type of thinking emphasized in the VM Job Plan.

Option B (Convergent and abstract) is incorrect because it omits divergent thinking, which is critical in the Creative Phase.

Option C (Critical and divergent) is incorrect because, while critical thinking is involved in Evaluation, the VM Job Plan specifically emphasizes convergent thinking to narrow down ideas.

Option D (Convergent and divergent) is correct, as it captures the dual thinking types leveraged across the VM Job Plan phases.

The Development Phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan involves refining selected ideas into actionable proposals, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “during the Development Phase, the VM team develops proposals by addressing technical feasibility, assessing time and schedule impacts, determining costs, identifying risks, and providing implementation plans.” These tasks ensure that proposals are practical, cost-effective, and ready for presentation to stakeholders.

A. Address technical feasibility: Correct, as the team must ensure the proposal can be implemented technically (e.g., does the design work?).

B. Assess time and schedule impacts: Correct, as the team evaluates how the proposal affects the project timeline (e.g., delays or accelerations).

D. Determine costs: Correct, as cost modeling is a key task (as noted in Question 9), providing stakeholders with financial impacts of the proposal.

C. State the disposition of the proposal: Incorrect, as stating the disposition (e.g., accepted, rejected) occurs after the Presentation Phase, when stakeholders decide on the proposal, not during Development.

E. Validate the proposal: Incorrect, as validation (e.g., testing or final confirmation) typically occurs during implementation or post-study, not during Development, which focuses on creating the proposal.

The Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan is a structured, systematic process central to Value Methodology, as defined in the Value Methodology Fundamentals 1 (VMF 1) course and SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard. According to these sources, the VM Job Plan consists ofsix phases: Information, Function Analysis, Creative, Evaluation, Development, and Presentation. These phases ensure a disciplined approach to analyzing functions, generating ideas, evaluating alternatives, and presenting value-enhancing recommendations.

Information Phase: Collect and analyze data on project scope, costs, constraints, and objectives to establish a baseline for the study.

Function Analysis Phase: Identify, classify, and analyze functions (e.g., basic, secondary) using tools like the Function Analysis System Technique (FAST) to understand their purpose and relationships.

Creative Phase: Generate a broad range of ideas to improve value through brainstorming or other creative techniques, focusing on alternative ways to perform functions.

Evaluation Phase: Assess the feasibility, cost impact, and benefits of ideas using criteria like performance, quality, and alignment with project goals.

Development Phase: Refine the most promising ideas into detailed, actionable proposals, including implementation plans and cost estimates.

Presentation Phase: Communicate recommendations to stakeholders through reports, presentations, or other deliverables to gain approval and facilitate implementation.

SAVE International’s VMF 1 course, which is a prerequisite for the VMA exam, explicitly teaches these six phases as part of Core Competency #3 (Value Methodology Job Plan). The standard is consistent across SAVE International’s documentation, including the Value Methodology Standard and certification guidelines. Options A (3), C (7), and D (8) do not match the official six-phase structure of the VM Job Plan.

In Value Methodology (VM), gathering input from customers and stakeholders is a key activity, particularly during the Information Phase of the VM Job Plan, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, various techniques are used to collect stakeholder input, including interviews, questionnaires, surveys, and focus panels. The standard defines these as follows:

Interviews: One-on-one discussions with individual stakeholders to gather detailed insights.

Questionnaires: Written sets of questions distributed to stakeholders, typically completed individually.

Surveys: Similar to questionnaires, often distributed to a larger group, with responses collected individually.

Focus panels: Group discussions involving multiple customers and stakeholders simultaneously, designed to capture collective input and foster dialogue.

The question specifies a technique that involves capturing input “at the same time” from multiple customers and stakeholders, which aligns with the definition offocus panels. Focus panels (or focus groups) bring together diverse stakeholders in a single session to discuss needs, preferences, and concerns, allowing for real-time interaction and consensus-building, which is particularly useful in VM studies to understand project objectives and constraints.

Option A (Interviews) is incorrect because interviews are typically conducted one-on-one, not with multiple stakeholders simultaneously.

Option B (Questionnaires) is incorrect because questionnaires are completed individually, not in a group setting at the same time.

Option C (Surveys) is incorrect because surveys are also completed individually, often asynchronously, not at the same time.

Option D (Focus panels) is correct, as it involves capturing input from multiple stakeholders simultaneously in a group setting.

The Pareto Principle, often referred to as the 80/20 rule, is a concept used in Value Methodology to focus efforts on the most impactful areas during cost analysis. In the context of VM, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #4: Cost Analysis), the Pareto Principle is applied to identify high-cost areas that offer the greatest potential for value improvement. According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “the Pareto Principle in VM states that approximately 20% of the elements (components, functions, or items) typically account for 80% of the total cost.” This allows the VM team to prioritize their efforts on the small number of elements that drive the majority of the cost, thereby maximizing value improvement (function/cost). For example, in a project, a few components (like a specialized motor in a machine) might represent the bulk of the cost, and optimizing those components can yield significant savings.

Option A (20% of risks impact 80% of elements) is incorrect because the Pareto Principle in VM focuses on cost distribution, not risk impact.

Option B (20% of elements represent 80% of the cost) is correct, as it directly aligns with the application of the Pareto Principle in VM cost analysis.

Option C (80% of functions represent 20% of components) is incorrect because it reverses the principle and does not reflect the cost-focused application in VM.

Option D (80% of the whole includes 20% of the resources) is incorrect because it misapplies the principle and is too vague for VM’s specific use of Pareto in cost analysis.

In Value Methodology, cost analysis often involves evaluating the economic impact of alternatives over time, which requires understanding the time value of money. The VMF 1 course, under Core Competency #4 (Cost Analysis), includes financial concepts like discounting cash flows to assess long-term value. The concept of converting all costs to a common reference point in today’s dollars refers toPresent Worth (or Net Present Value, NPV). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, Present Worth (or NPV) is used to “evaluate the economic feasibility of alternatives by discounting future cash flows to their present value, accounting for the time value of money.” This process converts all costs and benefits (adjusted for time, value, and money) to a single value in today’s dollars using a discount rate, allowing for a fair comparison of alternatives.

Option A (Return on Investment or ROI) is incorrect because ROI measures profitability as a percentage and does not convert costs to a present value.

Option B (Present Worth or Net Present Value) is correct because NPV accounts for the effects of time, value, and money by discounting future cash flows to today’s dollars.

Option C (Discount Rate) is incorrect because the discount rate is the rate used in NPV calculations, not the method of converting costs itself.

Option D (Simple Payback or Breakeven Point) is incorrect because payback measures the time to recover an investment and does not account for the time value of money or convert costs to present value.

The Evaluation Phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan involves assessing ideas using a three-level filtering process, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #7: Evaluation and Selection of Alternatives). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, the three levels of filters are Coarse, Medium, and Fine (as confirmed in Question 33). The standard further specifies that “the Fine filter applies detailed evaluation techniques, such as an evaluation matrix, to select the best ideas for development by scoring them against weighted criteria.” An evaluation matrix (e.g., a weighted matrix, as noted in Question 11) is a tool where ideas are scored based on criteria like cost, performance, and risk, with weights reflecting their importance (as in Question 51). This detailed, quantitative approach is used in the Fine filter to make final selections after the Coarse (initial screening) and Medium (shortlisting) filters have narrowed down the ideas.

Option A (Fine) is correct, as the Fine filter uses an evaluation matrix technique for detailed idea selection.

Option B (Reasonable) is incorrect because “Reasonable” is not one of the three filter levels; the correct levels are Coarse, Medium, and Fine.

Option C (Medium) is incorrect because the Medium filter involves a more general assessment (e.g., comparing ideas against criteria), not the detailed matrix technique.

Option D (Coarse) is incorrect because the Coarse filter is for initial screening (eliminating unfeasible ideas), not detailed evaluation with a matrix.

The diagram provided is a Function Analysis System Technique (FAST) diagram, a key tool in Value Methodology’s Function Analysis phase, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2). FAST diagrams map the relationships between functions of a system, with the horizontal axis showing the “how-why” logic (critical path) and the vertical axis showing supporting functions. Functions are classified as basic, secondary, required secondary, or higher-order based on their position and role in the diagram. According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “the basic function is the primary purpose of the system, typically found on the critical path; higher-order functions are the reasons why the basic function exists, located to the left of the basic function; secondary functions support the basic function and are often vertical; and required secondary functions are necessary to achieve the basic function.”

In the FAST diagram:

The critical path (horizontal, marked by Y in an earlier question) runs from E to F to G to J to L to M to N to O, representing the main sequence of functions.

Scope lines (B and D) define the study’s boundaries, as identified in Question 15.

Function E is positioned at the far left of the critical path, just inside the left scope line (B).

In FAST diagramming:

Thebasic functionis the primary purpose of the system, typically located near the center or right of the critical path within the scope lines. Here, it would likely be a function like J or L, which is central to the system’s purpose.

Thehigher-order functionis the reason “why” the basic function exists and is located to the left of the basic function, often at or near the left scope line. Function E, being the leftmost function on the critical path, answers “why” the subsequent functions (F, G, etc.) exist, making it the higher-order function.

Secondary functions(e.g., S, T, U, K) are vertical, supporting the critical path, and are not on the main horizontal sequence.

Required secondary functionsare secondary functions essential to the basic function, but E is on the critical path, not a vertical supporting function.

Thus, Function E, as the leftmost function on the critical path, is thehigher-order function, representing the overarching objective or need that the system fulfills.

Option A (Secondary Function) is incorrect because secondary functions are off the critical path (e.g., S, T, K), while E is on the critical path.

Option B (Required Secondary Function) is incorrect because E is not a secondary function; it is on the main path, not a supporting vertical function.

Option C (Basic Function) is incorrect because the basic function is typically more central on the critical path, not at the far left.

Option D (Higher Order Function) is correct, as E’s position at the left of the critical path indicates it is the higher-order function, answering “why” the system exists.

Function Analysis in Value Methodology involves identifying and classifying functions using verb-noun combinations, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2). The basic function of an item is its primary purpose—what it must do to fulfill its intended use. For a bicycle, the basic function is the most general and essential action it performs. According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, functions should be defined in broad, measurable terms (e.g., verb-noun format) to capture the core purpose. The basic function of a bicycle is to “provide transportation,” as this encompasses its primary role of enabling movement for people or goods.

Option A (Transport Mass) is incorrect because “mass” is too vague and not specific to the bicycle’s purpose; it could apply to any object being moved.

Option B (Move People) is incorrect because, while a bicycle often moves people, this is a secondary function—bicycles can also transport goods (e.g., in cargo bikes), so it’s not the most fundamental function.

Option C (Provide Transportation) is correct because it captures the bicycle’s primary purpose in the broadest sense, covering both people and goods, aligning with VM’s focus on defining basic functions at a high level.

Option D (Transport Goods) is incorrect because transporting goods is a specific use case, not the bicycle’s primary function, which is broader.

In Value Methodology’s Function Analysis, functions are classified based on their characteristics, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2: Function Analysis). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “all-the-time functions are those that occur continuously or are always active during the operation of the system.” In a FAST diagram, all-the-time functions are often shown vertically (e.g., “when” direction) alongside the critical path, indicating they are ongoing while the main functions are performed. For example, in a car, “provide safety” (e.g., through seatbelts) is an all-the-time function because it is always active when the car is in use. This aligns with the FAST diagramming convention of showing simultaneous functions.

Option A (Outside the study scope) is incorrect because all-the-time functions are within the scope if they are part of the system’s operation, though they may be supporting functions.

Option B (A drain on resources) is incorrect because all-the-time functions are not necessarily resource-intensive; they are simply continuous.

Option C (Continuous) is correct, as it matches the definition of all-the-time functions in VM.

Option D (Undesirable) is incorrect because all-the-time functions are not inherently undesirable; they may be essential (e.g., “provide safety”).

The Information Phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan involves gathering and transforming data to understand the subject of the study, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “key data for a product value study typically includes design objectives, cost estimates, drawings, specifications, and resource models, which are transformed to define functions, costs, and constraints.” These data types are essential for a product-focused study (as opposed to a process or construction project), enabling the VM team to:

Understand the product’s purpose (design objectives).

Analyze costs (original cost estimate, before optimization).

Review technical details (drawings, specifications).

Assess resource use (resource models).Customer demographics may provide context but are not core to transforming information for a product value study.

Option A (Flow diagrams, latest cost estimate, labor reports, drawings, site plan, regulatory requirements): This is more suited for a process or construction project (e.g., flow diagrams, site plan), not a product value study.

Option B (Customer requirements, overhead cost, competitive analysis, sample components, packaging requirements, warranty information): While customer requirements and sample components are relevant, competitive analysis, packaging, and warranty are secondary; overhead cost is too specific and not a core data type for transformation.

Option C (Design objectives, original cost estimate, drawings, specifications, resource models, customer demographics): This is correct, as it includes the core data types for a product value study (design objectives, cost estimate, drawings, specifications, resource models), though customer demographics are less critical but acceptable as context.

Option D (Customer demographics, overhead cost, drawings, competitive analysis, sample components, labor reports): This includes less relevant data (customer demographics, competitive analysis, labor reports) and misses key items like design objectives and specifications.

Option C (Design objectives, original cost estimate, drawings, specifications, resource models, customer demographics) is correct, as it best aligns with the key data needed for a product value study.

The diagram provided is a Function Analysis System Technique (FAST) diagram, a key tool in Value Methodology’s Function Analysis phase, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2). FAST diagrams map the relationships between functions of a system, with the horizontal axis showing the “how-why” logic (critical path) and the vertical axis showing supporting functions. The vertical demarcations on the left and right of a FAST diagram are calledscope lines, which define the boundaries of the study. According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “scope lines indicate the limits of the system or project being analyzed, separating the functions within the study’s scope from external functions or assumptions.” This was previously established in Question 15, where scope lines were identified as the correct term for these vertical demarcations.

In the FAST diagram:

The dashed vertical lines on the left and right are labeledB(left) andD(right). These lines define the scope of the study, with functions inside the lines (e.g., E, F, G, J, L, M, N, O) being within the study’s focus, while functions outside (e.g., P, Q, R) are external assumptions or higher-level objectives.

Ais a horizontal line at the bottom, representing the boundary of the diagram but not the scope lines.

Cis an arrow indicating the direction of the “why” axis (left), not a scope line.

Since the question asks for the letter that “represents the scope lines,” and both B and D are scope lines, the correct answer must be one of these. However, the options only allow for one letter to be selected, and in FAST diagramming convention, the left scope line (B) is often emphasized as the primary boundary for defining the study’s starting point (e.g., the higher-order function E, as identified in Question 18). Thus,Bis the most appropriate choice among the options provided.

Option A (A) is incorrect because A is a horizontal line, not a vertical scope line.

Option B (B) is correct, as B is the left vertical scope line, marking the boundary of the study’s scope.

Option C (C) is incorrect because C is an arrow, not a scope line.

Option D (D) is also a scope line (the right boundary), but since only one letter can be selected and B is the left scope line (often the primary focus in FAST diagramming), B is chosen. If the question intended to allow both B and D, the phrasing would need adjustment.

The Information Phase is the first phase of the Value Methodology (VM) Job Plan, where the team gathers and understands data about the study subject, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #3: Value Methodology Job Plan). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “an effective Information Phase kickoff meeting sets the stage for the VM study by outlining the goals for the study subject and the VM study objectives, ensuring alignment among team members and stakeholders.” This involves clarifying the purpose of the study, the project’s goals (e.g., reduce costs, improve performance), and the specific objectives of the VM study (e.g., achieve 20% cost savings while maintaining function). This aligns with the primary objective of the Information Phase—to understand the subject—and ensures the team starts with a clear direction.

Option A (Discusses the challenges of the proposed VM study approach) is incorrect because, while challenges may be acknowledged, the primary focus of the kickoff is to set goals and objectives, not discuss challenges.

Option B (Outlines goals for the study subject and VM study objectives) is correct, as it matches the purpose of an effective Information Phase kickoff meeting.

Option C (Indicates the VM solutions desired by decision makers) is incorrect because solutions are developed later (e.g., in the Creativity and Development Phases), not during the Information Phase kickoff.

Option D (Describes how functions have normally been accomplished) is incorrect because this level of functional detail is addressed in the Function Analysis Phase, not the Information Phase kickoff.

In Value Methodology’s Function Analysis, the concepts of functions and activities are distinct but related, as taught in the VMF 1 course (Core Competency #2: Function Analysis). According to SAVE International’s Value Methodology Standard, “a function is defined as what a product, process, or system does, expressed in a verb-noun format (e.g., ‘contain liquid’), while an activity is a task, action, or operation that describes how a function is performed.” For example, the function of a teacup might be “contain liquid,” and the activity to achieve that function could be “holding the liquid in a ceramic structure.” Activities are the actionable steps or processes that enable the function, often identified during the creation of a FAST diagram or Random Function Identification table (as noted in Question 19). The “how” aspect aligns with the How-Why logic of FAST diagrams, where activities detail the practical execution of a function.

Option A (A task, action, or operation that describes why a function is performed) is incorrect because “why” relates to the higher-order function or purpose (e.g., Question 20), not the activity, which focuses on “how.”

Option B (A specific task, action, or operation that is generic and changes viewpoints) is incorrect because activities are not about changing viewpoints; they are specific actions to perform a function.

Option C (A task, action, or operation that describes how a function is performed) is correct, as it aligns with the definition of an activity in VM.

Option D (A specific task, action, or operation with a high level of abstraction) is incorrect because activities are practical and specific, not abstract; functions are more abstract (e.g., verb-noun format).