According to API RP 571, under Naphthenic Acid Corrosion (NAC) :

“The most severe corrosion is typically found in areas of high velocity and turbulence, such as at pump around nozzles, transfer lines, elbows, reducers, and orifices.”

“NAC is characterized by uniform thinning and can accelerate significantly where flow-induced erosion is present.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.4.1 – Naphthenic Acid Corrosion)

This clearly establishes that high velocity and turbulence increase NAC severity, making option D correct.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Ethanol stress corrosion cracking (SCC) of carbon steel is strongly dependent on the presence of water .

Per API RP 571 , moisture content is the primary controlling factor , because:

Water enables formation of corrosive species

Dry or very low-water ethanol does not cause SCC

Even small amounts of water significantly increase cracking risk

Other factors influence severity, but without moisture, ethanol SCC does not occur .

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Ethanol Stress Corrosion Cracking

======================

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Per API RP 571 , chloride stress corrosion cracking (Cl-SCC) of austenitic stainless steels is strongly influenced by low pH environments in the presence of chlorides, tensile stress, and elevated temperature.

API RP 571 identifies that:

Chloride SCC can initiate at very low pH levels

pH values near 2 represent a threshold where aggressive chloride attack and cracking become possible

Increasing acidity dramatically increases SCC susceptibility

Therefore, pH = 2 is the lowest and most critical value listed where chloride SCC can begin.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking

======================

API RP 571 states under Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking (Cl-SCC) :

“Nickel contents above approximately 35% provide significant resistance to chloride stress corrosion cracking. Alloys such as Alloy 625 and Alloy 825 exhibit excellent resistance.”

“Austenitic stainless steels with lower nickel contents, such as 304 and 316, are more susceptible to Cl-SCC.”

Hence, option C (35%) is correct.

API RP 571 under Nitriding (Section 4.2.16):

“Nitriding occurs at elevated temperatures and is most severe at temperatures above 900°F (480°C) .”

“This mechanism is associated with the reaction of ammonia or other nitrogen-containing compounds with the steel surface, leading to brittle nitride formation.”

Therefore, the correct answer is D .

Per API RP 571 , susceptibility to hydrogen embrittlement is strongly influenced by:

Material strength level

Microstructure

Heat treatment condition

Heat treatment determines:

Dislocation density

Trap sites for hydrogen

Residual stress state

The modulus of elasticity does not significantly affect hydrogen embrittlement susceptibility, making Option A incorrect.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Hydrogen Embrittlement

======================

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

High-Temperature Hydrogen Attack (HTHA) is described in API RP 571 and API RP 941 as a damage mechanism where hydrogen reacts with carbides at elevated temperature and pressure, forming methane and causing loss of strength and fissuring .

Prevention is primarily achieved by selecting materials with stable carbides that resist hydrogen attack. Chromium and molybdenum alloying elements :

Form more stable carbides

Reduce susceptibility to methane formation

Extend safe operating limits

Why the other options are incorrect:

Option B may be used in some services but is not the usual prevention method.

Option C is incorrect because RP 941 does not recommend high-nickel alloys as the primary solution .

Option D low-carbon steels are more susceptible , not resistant.

API RP 571 clearly identifies Cr-Mo alloy steels as the standard mitigation approach.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on High-Temperature Hydrogen Attack

API RP 941 – Nelson Curves and Material Selection

======================

According to API RP 571, under Sulfuric Acid Corrosion:

“The most aggressive corrosion typically occurs below 65% H₂SO₄, particularly between 20% to 50% concentration range.”

“Above 95% concentration, sulfuric acid becomes less corrosive to carbon steel due to its dehydrating nature.”

“Dilute sulfuric acid is highly ionized and conducts electricity well, increasing corrosion rates.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.3.2 – Sulfuric Acid Corrosion)

Hence, the most severe corrosion occurs below 65% concentration, making option B the accurate answer.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

According to API RP 571 , chloride stress corrosion cracking (Cl-SCC) of austenitic (300 series) stainless steels becomes a credible concern when:

Chlorides are present

Tensile stress exists

Metal temperatures exceed approximately 140 °F (60 °C)

Below this temperature, Cl-SCC is far less likely, while susceptibility increases rapidly above this threshold.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Chloride Stress Corrosion Cracking

======================

API RP 571 describes under Caustic Corrosion :

“One of the significant contributing factors is caustic accumulation in low-flow or stagnant areas , especially in heat-traced lines or around steam injection points.”

“Localized heating can concentrate caustic solutions, promoting corrosion even in carbon or stainless steels.”

Thus, option C (heat-traced equipment) is the correct and technically accurate choice.