API RP 571 on Thermal Fatigue :

“Mixing of hot and cold streams , particularly where hydrogen is present, can induce thermal cycling stresses , leading to thermal fatigue cracking , especially at fittings like tees.”

“Hydrogen embrittlement typically affects stressed zones, but this pattern strongly indicates thermal fatigue.”

So the correct answer is C – Thermal fatigue .

As per API RP 571 and further clarified in API RP 939-C :

“An arbitrary threshold of 50 ppmw H₂S in the aqueous phase is often used to define when carbon and low alloy steels become susceptible to cracking damage in wet H₂S environments.”

“Below this level, the risk of SSC, HIC, and SOHIC is considered lower, although damage has still occurred at lower concentrations depending on stress and metallurgical conditions.”

Therefore, the correct answer is option D (50 ppmw).

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

According to API RP 571 , graphitization is a high-temperature degradation mechanism that occurs in carbon and carbon-molybdenum steels exposed for long periods at temperatures typically above 800 °F (425 °C) .

In this process:

Iron carbides decompose into free graphite nodules

The steel loses strength, ductility, and pressure-retaining capability

Failures can occur without significant wall loss

Graphitization does not occur in aluminum, stainless steels, or nickel-copper alloys such as Monel.

Referenced Documents (Study Basis):

API RP 571 – Section on Graphitization

======================

From API RP 571, brittle fracture prevention measures include:

“Postweld Heat Treatment (PWHT) reduces residual stresses in the heat affected zone and base metal, thus lowering susceptibility to brittle fracture.”

“PWHT is particularly effective when applied to pressure-containing components fabricated from carbon steel or low-alloy steel that will experience low-temperature service.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.1.2 – Brittle Fracture)

Therefore, while other measures may reduce stress or detect flaws, PWHT directly targets one of the root causes: residual stress. Thus, option D is the best prevention method.

API RP 571 under Polythionic Acid Stress Corrosion Cracking (PTA SCC) specifies:

“Cracking is usually intergranular , and often localized , especially in sensitized austenitic stainless steels exposed to sulfur-containing environments during shutdown or cleaning.”

“It is not always visible on inspection and may only become evident when a leak occurs.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.2.2.5 – PTA SCC)

Hence, option C is correct as it best describes the detection difficulty and behavior of PTA SCC.

API RP 571, under Organic Acid Corrosion , highlights:

“Corrosive organic acids in overhead systems are those that condense at temperatures above the water dew point. These acids condense independently of water and can form highly concentrated corrosive films.”

“When acids condense first, they aggressively corrode carbon steel prior to any water wash mitigation.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 4.3.3.9 – Organic Acid Corrosion)

Hence, option D correctly identifies the most aggressive corrosion scenario.

According to API RP 571, under Oxidation:

“Austenitic stainless steels (300 Series) are generally used for oxidation resistance up to about 1500°F (815°C). At higher temperatures, scaling and loss of protective chromium oxide layers increase.”

“Above these temperatures, specialized high-temperature alloys may be required.”

(Reference: API RP 571, Section 5.1.1 – Oxidation)

Therefore, option C is the correct answer.