Which aspect of the GDPR will likely have the most impact on the consistent implementation of data protection

laws throughout the European Union?

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next question:

Louis, a long-time customer of Bedrock Insurance, was involved in a minor car accident a few months ago. Although no one was hurt, Louis has been plagued by texts and calls from a company called Accidentable offering to help him recover compensation for personal injury. Louis has heard about insurance companies selling customers’ data to third parties, and he’s convinced that Accidentable must have gotten his information from Bedrock Insurance.

Louis has also been receiving an increased amount of marketing information from Bedrock, trying to sell him their full range of their insurance policies.

Perturbed by this, Louis has started looking at price comparison sites on the internet and has been shocked to find that other insurers offer much cheaper rates than Bedrock, even though he has been a loyal customer for many years. When his Bedrock policy comes up for renewal, he decides to switch to Zantrum Insurance.

In order to activate his new insurance policy, Louis needs to supply Zantrum with information about his No Claims bonus, his vehicle and his driving history. After researching his rights under the GDPR, he writes to ask Bedrock to transfer his information directly to Zantrum. He also takes this opportunity to ask Bedrock to stop using his personal data for marketing purposes.

Bedrock supplies Louis with a PDF and XML (Extensible Markup Language) versions of his No Claims Certificate, but tells Louis it cannot transfer his data directly to Zantrum as this is not technically feasible. Bedrock also explains that Louis’s contract included a provision whereby Louis agreed that his data could be used for marketing purposes; according to Bedrock, it is too late for Louis to change his mind about this. It angers Louis when he recalls the wording of the contract, which was filled with legal jargon and very confusing.

In the meantime, Louis is still receiving unwanted calls from Accidentable Insurance. He writes to Accidentable to ask for the name of the organization that supplied his details to them. He warns Accidentable that he plans to complain to the data protection authority, because he thinks their company has been using his data unlawfully. His letter states that he does not want his data being used by them in any way.

Accidentable’s response letter confirms Louis’s suspicions. Accidentable is Bedrock Insurance’s wholly owned subsidiary, and they received information about Louis’s accident from Bedrock shortly after Louis submitted his accident claim. Accidentable assures Louis that there has been no breach of the GDPR, as Louis’s contract included, a provision in which he agreed to share his information with Bedrock’s affiliates for business purposes.

Louis is disgusted by the way in which he has been treated by Bedrock, and writes to them insisting that all his information be erased from their computer system.

Which statement accurately summarizes Bedrock’s obligation in regard to Louis’s data portability request?

Jerry the Chief Marketing Officer for a sports apparel and trophy company, sells products to schools and athletic clubs globally Recently the company has decided to invest in a new line of customized sports equipment Jerry plans to email his current customer base to offer them a discount on their first purchase of such equipment.

Jerry tells Kate, the Director of Privacy, about his plan. What is the best guidance Kate can provide to Jerry?

What is true of both the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Council of Europe Convention 108?

The GDPR specifies fines that may be levied against data controllers for certain infringements. Which of the following infringements would be subject to the less severe administrative fine of up to 10 million euros (or in the case of an undertaking, up to 2% of the total worldwide annual turnover of the preceding financial year)?

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next question:

Jack worked as a Pharmacovigiliance Operations Specialist in the Irish office of a multinational pharmaceutical company on a clinical trial related to COVID-19. As part of his onboarding process Jack received privacy training He was explicitly informed that while he would need to process confidential patient data in the course of his work, he may under no circumstances use this data for anything other than the performance of work-related (asks This was also specified in the privacy policy, which Jack signed upon conclusion of the training.

After several months of employment, Jack got into an argument with a patient over the phone. Out of anger he later posted the patient's name and hearth information, along with disparaging comments, on a social media website. When this was discovered by his Pharmacovigilance supervisors. Jack was immediately dismissed

Jack's lawyer sent a letter to the company stating that dismissal was a disproportionate sanction, and that if Jack was not reinstated within 14 days his firm would have no alternative but to commence legal proceedings against the company. This letter was accompanied by a data access request from Jack requesting a copy of "all personal data, including internal emails that were sent/received by Jack or where Jack is directly or indirectly identifiable from the contents. In relation to the emails Jack listed six members of the management team whose inboxes the required access.

How should the company respond to Jack's request to be forgotten?

With the issue of consent, the GDPR allows member states some choice regarding what?

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next question:

Financially, it has been a very good year at ARRA Hotels: Their 21 hotels, located in

Greece (5), Italy (15) and Spain (1), have registered their most profitable results

ever. To celebrate this achievement, ARRA Hotels' Human Resources office, based

in ARRA's main Italian establishment, has organized a team event for its 420

employees and their families at its hotel in Spain.

Upon arrival at the hotel, each employee and family member is given an electronic

wristband at the reception desk. The wristband serves a number of functions:

. Allows access to the "party zone" of the hotel, and emits a buzz if the user

approaches any unauthorized areas

. Allows up to three free drinks for each person of legal age, and emits a

buzz once this limit has been reached

. Grants a unique ID number for participating in the games and contests that

have been planned.

Along with the wristband, each guest receives a QR code that leads to the online

privacy notice describing the use of the wristband. The page also contains an

unchecked consent checkbox. In the case of employee family members under the

age of 16, consent must be given by a parent.

Among the various activities planned for the event, ARRA Hotels' HR office has

autonomously set up a photocall area, separate from the main event venue, where

employees can come and have their pictures taken in traditional carnival costume.

The photos will be posted on ARRA Hotels' main website for general marketing

purposes.

On the night of the event, an employee from one of ARRA's Greek hotels is

displeased with the results of the photos in which he appears. He intends to file a

complaint with the relevant supervisory authority in regard to the following:

. The lack of any privacy notice in the separate photocall area

The unlawful cross-border processing of his personal data

. The unacceptable aesthetic outcome of his photos

Which of the following is NOT necessarily considered a factor in identifying whether

the processing could be considered a "cross-border processing"?

In the Planet 49 case, what was the main judgement of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) regarding the issue of cookies?

SCENARIO - Please use the following to answer the next question:

It has been a tough season for the Spanish Handball League, with acts of violence and racism having increased exponentially during their last few matches.

In order to address this situation, the Spanish Minister of Sports, in conjunction with the National Handball League Association, issued an Administrative Order (the "Act") obliging all the professional clubs to install a fingerprint-reading system for accessing some areas of the sports halls, primarily the ones directly behind the goalkeepers. The rest of the areas would retain the current access system, which allows any spectators access as long as they hold valid tickets.

The Act named a selected hardware and software provider, New Digital Finger, Ltd., for the creation of the new fingerprint system. Additionally, it stipulated that any of the professional clubs that failed to install this system within a two-year period would face fines under the Act.

The Murla HB Club was the first to install the new system, renting the New Digital Finger hardware and software. Immediately afterward, the Murla HB Club automatically renewed current supporters' subscriptions, while introducing a new contractual clause requiring supporters to access specific areas of the hall through the new fingerprint reading system installed at the gates.

After the first match hosted by the Murla HB Club, a local supporter submitted a complaint to the club and to the Spanish Data Protection Authority (the AEPD), claiming that the new access system violates EU data protection laws. Having been notified by the AEPD of the upcoming investigation regarding this complaint, the Murla HB Club immediately carried out a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA), the conclusions of which stated that the new access system did not pose any high risks to data subjects’ privacy rights.

The Murla HB Club should have carried out a DPIA before the installation of the new access system and at what other time?