Successful change management in SAP OCM hinges on people and collaboration. Option C is correct—being user-centric and empathetic (e.g., addressing a user’s fear of change with tailored support) ensures adoption by meeting emotional and practical needs, not just pushing info. Option D is correct as trustful cooperation with project management—e.g., aligning OCM with milestones—integrates efforts, like syncing training with testing, avoiding silos.

Option A is incorrect—standard tools help, but flexibility (e.g., custom workshops) is key; rigidity limits impact. Option B is incorrect—ROI calculation is impractical for OCM’s qualitative benefits (e.g., morale); focus is on outcomes, not finance. SAP OCM thrives on empathy and partnership.

“Deliver change management successfully by being user-centric and empathetic, and fostering trustful cooperation with project management” (SAP OCM Framework, Success Recommendations).

After a change impact analysis (CIA) workshop, the change manager transitions from data collection to action planning and communication. Option A is correct because driving and facilitating follow-up activities (e.g., communication plans, training sessions) ensures the CIA findings translate into actionable steps to address impacts. This involves collaborating with stakeholders to prioritize and design interventions. Option B is correct as planning and conducting validation sessions with impacted groups confirms the accuracy of findings and secures buy-in, a key step to refine the analysis and build trust. Option D is correct because creating and aligning the result report consolidates workshop outcomes (e.g., impact severity, affected areas) into a formal document shared with project leadership and stakeholders for alignment and decision-making.

Option C is incorrect—while visualizing data and aggregating insights might occur, it’s typically part of the workshop preparation or facilitation, not a post-workshop task, which focuses on action rather than analysis. Option E is incorrect; reviewing and refining KPIs for user adoption is a broader, ongoing task tied to the Run phase, not an immediate post-CIA activity. The change manager’s role here is to operationalize the CIA, ensuring its insights drive the next steps in the change process. This reflects SAP OCM’s emphasis on translating analysis into practical outcomes.

“Post-CIA tasks include facilitating follow-up activities, validating findings with stakeholders, and creating a result report to ensure impacts are addressed effectively” (SAP Activate, OCM Workstream, Change Impact Analysis Process).

During the go-live phase (SAP Activate Deploy phase), change management focuses on supporting end-users to ensure adoption and smooth transition. Option C is correct because organizing Q&A sessions for key users addresses immediate concerns, fosters confidence, and aligns with OCM’s role in facilitating two-way communication. Option D is correct as sending out ad-hoc support information (e.g., helpdesk contacts) ensures users know where to turn for help, a critical task to sustain adoption post-go-live. Option A is incorrect—informing external suppliers is typically a business or procurement responsibility, not OCM’s focus. Option B is also incorrect; collecting workflow adjustment requirements is a technical or process owner task, not a communication duty of change management. In SAP OCM, communication tasks at go-live prioritize user enablement and support over external or technical adjustments.

“In the Deploy phase, change management executes communication activities such as user Q&A sessions and support announcements to reinforce adoption and address immediate post-go-live needs” (SAP Activate Methodology, Change Management Workstream, Deploy Phase).

SAP’s integrated enablement approach in OCM prepares users for cloud adoption. Option A is correct because enablement execution includes project management (coordinating efforts), content development (creating materials), and delivery (training sessions), forming the operational core. Option D is correct as enablement planning—strategy (defining approach) and learning needs analysis (identifying gaps for project team/users)—sets the foundation for execution.

Option B is incorrect; advisory (best practices, coaching) supports but isn’t a core element—it’s external guidance. Option C is incorrect; infrastructure (administration, systems) is logistical, not a defining component. SAP OCM focuses on planning and execution as the heart of enablement.

“SAP’s enablement approach comprises planning (strategy and needs analysis) and execution (management, content, delivery) to drive user readiness” (SAP Activate, Integrated Enablement Framework).

Change effectiveness in SAP OCM assesses impact through metrics. Option B is correct because a mix of metrics (e.g., adoption rates, satisfaction) ensures comprehensive evaluation. Option A is incorrect—open communication may help but isn’t specific to effectiveness delivery. Option C is incorrect; lessons learned should be routine, not conditional. Option D is impractical—ROI for OCM is hard to quantify precisely.

Extract from SAP OCM Concepts: SAP Activate recommends diverse metrics for effectiveness (SAP OCM Framework, Effectiveness).