Refer to the exhibit.

You want to enable devices in VRF B and VRF C to reach shared resources in VRF A. is this a valid strategy for meeting this goal?

Solution:Create a separate OSPF process for each VRF on Switch-1. Then redistribute each process into the other VRFs' processes.

Is this something that NetEdit 2.0 does after it discovers a switch?

Solution:It enables the switch REST API Interface, if disabled.

Refer to the exhibit.

Switch-1 and Switch-2 ate ArubaOS-CX switches thatimplement VXLAN WITHOUT EthernetVPN (EVPN). Switch-2 uses the same VNI-to-VLAN mappings as Switch-1. Is this how the specified servers communicate?

Solution:The first time that Server I communicates with Server 3, It sends an ARP request to resolve Server 3's MAC address.

Refer to the exhibits.

Is this how the switch-1handles the traffic?

Solution:A broadcast arrives in VLAN 10 on Switch-1. Switch 1 forwards the frame on all interfaces assigned to VLAN 10, except the incoming interface. It encapsulates the broadcast with VXIAN and sends it to 192.168.1.3, out not 192.168.1.2.

Refer to the exhibits.

Is this how the switch-1handles the traffic?

Solution:A broadcast arrives in VLAN 10 on Switch-1. Switch 1 forwards the frame on all interfaces assigned to VLAN10. except the incoming interface. It replicates the broadcast, encapsulates each broadcast with VXLAN. and sends the VXLAN traffic to 192.168.1.2 and 192.168.1.3.

Does this correctly describehow the Virtual Switching Extension (VSX) fabric reacts to various component failure scenarios?

Solution:The keepalive goes down, ISL link remains up. Switch-1 and Switch-2 remains up. The Split-recovery mode is disabled. In this case the secondary switch shutdowns Svls.

Is this statement about ARP and ND Suppression true?

Solution:Both ARP-Suppression and ND-Suppression are disabled by default.