Dynamic Forms Field and Field Section components historically required special mobile handling. Salesforce now provides the Dynamic Forms and Dynamic Highlights Panel on Mobile setting in Salesforce Mobile App Setup so mobile users can receive the Dynamic Forms experience used on desktop record pages. Salesforce specifically states that when users cannot receive Dynamic Forms Field and Field Section behavior on mobile, administrators should enable this setting from Setup → Salesforce Mobile App. Adding more Field Sections does not solve the underlying mobile-support setting. Visibility rules control when already-supported components appear, but they do not substitute for enabling Dynamic Forms on Mobile. Reverting mobile users to traditional page layouts is also unnecessary when Salesforce provides native Dynamic Forms mobile support. Therefore, C addresses the underlying configuration issue directly. Salesforce

================

The primary object of a custom report type is a fundamental design choice and cannot be changed after the report type is saved. Salesforce explicitly states in both the Enhanced and Legacy Custom Report Type Builder documentation that after saving a custom report type, the selected primary object cannot be changed. The primary object determines the base set of records represented by the report type and controls how additional related objects can subsequently be included. Consequently, the app builder must choose the Job Application object deliberately before saving the report type. Deployment does not permanently prevent a custom report type from being deleted, and the other options do not describe the core configuration limitation being tested. Therefore, B is the documented Platform App Builder consideration.

================

The correct answer is B. Create both customer and dealer as accounts, add each rep as a contact to the corresponding account and create an account hierarchy.

Customers and dealers are both separate business entities, and separate bills are sent to each. In Salesforce, business entities are best represented as Accounts, while the single individual at each business should be stored as a Contact under the correct Account. Salesforce account hierarchy is used to show parent-child relationships between related accounts.

Why not D? Account Teams represent internal Salesforce users working on an account, not external customer/dealer representation.

The correct answers are A. Change the Lead Duplicate Rule details to Bypass Sharing Rules and D. Change the Lead Duplicate actions to Block on Create.

Because Lead OWD is Private, users may not have access to existing duplicate Lead records. Salesforce duplicate rules can be configured to bypass sharing rules, allowing the duplicate rule to check possible duplicates regardless of ownership or user visibility. Salesforce Help specifically explains duplicate prevention can block users from creating duplicate records whether or not they have access to the existing record.

D is also required because detecting a duplicate is not enough. The duplicate rule action must be set to Block on Create to stop users from saving new duplicate Leads.

Why others are incorrect:

B is incorrect because Lead Assignment Rules assign leads; they do not prevent duplicate creation.

C may expose more Lead records, but changing OWD from Private to Public Read is not the best security-safe solution when duplicate rules can bypass sharing.

===========

Lightning Object Creator, represented in current Salesforce Setup as creating a custom object from a spreadsheet, is specifically designed for this scenario. Salesforce states that administrators can upload an XLSX, CSV, or Google Sheet and use the wizard to create a custom object, derive its fields from the spreadsheet columns, and populate the new object ' s records as part of the same process. This directly meets all three requirements: create the object, create the fields, and load the spreadsheet data. Schema Builder can create objects and fields but does not simultaneously import the spreadsheet ' s record data. Data Loader imports large volumes into existing objects but does not automatically construct an object and its schema. Data Import Wizard similarly assumes supported target objects already exist.

================

Executing Get Records inside a Loop generates another SOQL query for every iteration. In bulk processing, that pattern can quickly exceed Salesforce ' s per-transaction SOQL governor limit. Salesforce explicitly documents that a Flow retrieving records from inside a Loop can consume one SOQL query per iteration and fail after exceeding the transaction limit. The correct bulkification pattern is to retrieve the needed records once outside the Loop, store them in a collection, and then iterate over the already-retrieved data. Changing from after-save to before-save does not eliminate repeated queries. A Fault Path can handle an error but does not prevent the governor limit from being reached. Replacing the Loop with Assignment is not appropriate when multiple items still require iteration. Moving Get Records outside the Loop resolves the root architectural problem. Salesforce

================

Resource is specifically intended for approvers that must be resolved dynamically at runtime. Salesforce ' s Flow Approval Process documentation defines Resource as an approver type that references a variable containing a user ' s username, a public group ' s API name, or a queue ' s API name. At runtime, the associated orchestration resolves the value and determines the appropriate assignee. Therefore, the app builder should store the dynamically determined username in a text variable and select that resource in the approval step. Selecting User would require choosing a predetermined user while designing the approval process, which does not satisfy the runtime requirement. Queue similarly identifies a configured queue rather than dynamically resolving an individual user. A Formula cannot directly substitute for the Approver Type configuration specified by Salesforce ' s Flow Approval Process model.

================

The required metric is the total monetary value of won Opportunities for each Account. Salesforce supports roll-up summary fields on Account that aggregate Opportunity Amount and apply filtering criteria so that only qualifying child records are included. The appropriate configuration therefore uses SUM on Opportunity Amount with a filter restricting the calculation to Opportunities whose Stage represents Closed Won. Option C would incorrectly include open and lost Opportunities. COUNT-based options calculate the number of records rather than total sales value, and the roll-up belongs on the Account because that is where the summarized result must appear. Salesforce ' s current documentation specifically gives the example of an Account roll-up displaying total Opportunity amount and filtering the aggregation to only won Opportunities.

================

The correct answer is B. Verify there is an Apex test that provides test coverage for the flow.

For deploying an active autolaunched flow to production, Salesforce requires flow test coverage. Salesforce documentation states that before deploying a process or autolaunched flow as active, the org must meet flow test coverage requirements, and Apex tests must cover active processes and active autolaunched flows.

A is not the main deployment consideration for making the flow active in production.

C is incorrect because Salesforce does not require 100% flow test coverage.

D is incorrect for this scenario because the requirement is to deploy it already active, not manually activate it after deployment.

===========

A master-detail relationship provides the required cascade-delete behavior. Supplier__c should be configured as the master and Supplier_Item__c as the detail. Salesforce explicitly states that when a master record is deleted, its related detail and subdetail records are also deleted. This ensures that terminating the Supplier relationship removes the dependent Supplier Item records automatically without additional Flow or Apex automation. An indirect lookup relationship is used primarily to relate external-object data to Salesforce records and does not provide the required ownership and cascade behavior. A hierarchical relationship is available only for relationships involving the User object. Many-to-many describes a data-model pattern normally implemented with a junction object and does not itself specify the required parent-child cascade. Master-detail therefore directly implements the stated lifecycle dependency.

================