VCF provides integrated automation and orchestration for Day 0–2 operations, including networking: VCF is a “full-stack IaaS” with “automation and orchestration to simplify Day 0, Day 1, and Day 2 tasks.” VCF supports modern apps: users can provision “VMs” and “Kubernetes workloads” from self-service services, proving both VM and container support. Multi-tenancy with strong isolation is native: Organizations are “secure and isolated” boundaries; All Apps organizations run “virtual machines (VMs), Kubernetes… multiple tenants with secure infrastructure isolation.”

Incorrect choices: VCF is not limited to vSAN only (supports VMFS/NFS/CNS as documented elsewhere) and does not rely on manual scalability—automation is core. Compliance is provided within the private cloud, not only by a CSP.

The vSphere 9.0 Resource Management documentation, included within VMware Cloud Foundation 9.0, specifies that Resource Pools are the mechanism to delegate compute resources within a cluster. A resource pool acts as a container of compute resources (CPU and memory) that can be subdivided and assigned to VMs or groups of VMs.

The documentation states:

“Resource pools provide resource isolation, control, and delegation. You can configure reservations, limits, and shares to ensure that mission-critical workloads (such as production VMs) receive guaranteed resources, while development or test workloads consume only available resources.”

This aligns directly with the requirements:

Power on only if resources are available → Achieved via reservations and limits.

Production VMs require guaranteed levels of resources → Enforced using reservations.

Three-tier apps with varying demand → Controlled using shares and limits across multiple resource pools.

Other options are incorrect:

vSphere Availability (A) provides failover, not resource governance.

VCF Operations (B) monitors resource usage but does not allocate or enforce it.

Dynamic Resource Scheduling (D) balances workloads but does not provide delegated, guaranteed allocations per department or application tier.

Thus, the correct feature is vSphere Resource Pools.

AVM Classpredefines hardware for Supervisor-managed VMs: “The VM class… defines such parameters as the number of virtual CPUs, memory capacity, and reservation settings.”

Administration steps show these are configurable: “You can configure hardware resources such as CPU, memory, and different devices” when editing a VM class.

Additionally, the DCLI/API specification underscores CPU and Memory fields: “--cpu-count … Required.” and “--memory-mb … Required.” for a VM class.

While network adapters, PCI devices, and instance storage can also be added via advanced config, the question asks for two;CPUandMemoryare canonical, always-present VM Class resources per the core definition above.

===========

TheVCF Operations for Networks (formerly vRNI)enablesApplication Discovery and Network Visibility. According to VCF 9.0: “Operations for Networks provides flow-based application discovery, dependency mapping, and security planning. This allows administrators to visualize application topology and relationships across the VCF fleet.” By contrast, VCF Operations for Logs provides log aggregation, while the Collector provides integration for metrics, not discovery. The vSphere Supervisor enables Kubernetes workloads, not application discovery. Therefore, to achieveService and Application Discovery, administrators must deployVCF Operations for Networks.

TheVCF Healthfeature “provides a central location for monitoring the health of your environment,” including the ability to track “vCenter Server instances,” “ESXi hosts,” and “NSX deployments.” Health monitoring includes connectivity, configuration, and critical services status, surfacing alerts for remediation. The documentation’s scope statements make clear that VCF Health targets theinfrastructure components—vCenter, ESXi, and NSX—rather than the VCF Operations applications themselves (for example, Fleet Management or Logs). Therefore, the correct monitored components areESX hosts,vCenter Server, andNSX.

TheVCF 9.0 Operations Guide – Views and Reportsexplains the four types of views available for custom dashboards:

Object Relationship View:Displays dependencies and hierarchy between objects (for example, VMs, hosts, datastores) but does not provide exportable tabular data.

Scoreboard View:Provides a high-level KPI visualization of a few key objects but is not intended for large tabular exports.

List View (Correct):Displays tabular data across many objects, such as CPU, memory, and disk metrics for VMs. The guide states:“List views are useful when you want to compare metrics across multiple objects and can be exported to CSV for further analysis.”

Trend View:Focuses on historical data and growth over time, but export to CSV is not its primary purpose.

Because the security team requires bothtabular comparison of VM resource usageand the ability toexport the data to CSV, theList Viewis the only option that meets both requirements.

To create a VLAN segment in NSX, you must create it in a VLANtransport zoneand provide aVLAN ID. The NSX documentation states you “set up VLAN transport zones to… connect VLAN segments,” and when creating a VLAN-backed segment you select the VLAN transport zone. The segment creation flow shows “Segment Type: VLAN” with required “VLAN ID” entry and transport zone selection; gateways are not required to merely create a L2 segment. Default gateway IP and Tier-1 attachment are applicable for routed (overlay/T1) use cases, not mandatory for a basic VLAN L2 network; segment profiles can be applied but are not required to create the segment. Thus, the two required actions are selecting theVLAN transport zoneand specifying theVLAN ID.