If $x be the spot price of oil, then in order for the forward price to be $75, the following relationship must hold: ($x + $4/(1.06))*(1 + 6%) = $75. Solving, we get x = $66.98

It is important to note the distinction between the clearing house and the exchange itself. The clearing house does not get involved with physical delivery, nor does it provide any dispute settlement services. It only makes sure that cash is settled as and when due between the members. Therefore Choice ' c ' is the correct answer

From the put-call parity, we know that Call - Put = Stock - Bank deposit. Since the bank deposit has a zero Gamma, and the Gamma of the Stock itself is also 0, we get the relationship Gamma of Call - Gamma of Put = 0. Therefore, if the Gamma of a call option is 0.08, the Gamma of the corresponding put option is also 0.08.

The correct answer is Choice ' b ' , as this question is merely asking for the forward rate based on known spot rates. The forward rate applicable to the three month period commencing in 3 months time is given by [(1 + 6%*6/12)/(1 + 5%*3/12) - 1]*4 = 6.91%. Thus Choice ' b ' is the correct answer.

Here is a step by step way to think about it: $1 invested now at 6% for 6 months grows to (1 + 6%*6/12)=1.03. At the same time, using the 3 month rate, $1 invested now at 5% for 3 months grows to (1 + 5%*3/12)=1.0125. Effectively, this means that the 1.0125 at the end of 3 months grow to 1.03 at the end of 6 months, implying the rate of interest during the 3 months from 3 to 6 months is (1.03/1.0125 - 1)*4 = 6.91%.

Note that intrinsic value of an option is the difference between the value of the underlying and the strike price of the option.

European options can only be exercised at expiry, and Bermudan options only at certain dates during the life of the option. Therefore the option may be valued at less than intrinsic value if the earliest possible exercise date is not very close. An American option however can be exercised at any time prior to expiry, which means that its value can never fall below its intrinsic value. Because if it did, arbitrageurs would buy the option and immediately exercise it to get a risk free profit. It does not matter whether the option is a call or a put - therefore the correct answer is Choice ' c ' .

The yield to maturity for a bond trading at par will be identical to its coupon. Therefore the yield to maturity for this bond will be 5%

Energy derivative markets are still not very liquid, and experience high price volatility. This high volatility is responsible for most of the risk in these markets. Choice ' d ' is the correct answer.

The portfolio ' s beta is 0.8, and therefore in order to completely hedge the portfolio (ie reduce beta to 0), the portfolio manager would need to short 0.8 * $25m/(1450*$250) = 55.17 contracts, or 55 contracts. However, the ask here is to reduce the beta to 0.6, and not 0.

The number of contracts required to reduce the beta of a portfolio from ߠ to ߱ is give by ( ߠ - ߱ ) * Value of portfolio / Value of a single contract. In this case, this calculation works out to (0.8 - 0.6) * $25m/(1450*250) = 13.8, or roughly 14 contracts.

The portfolio manager should short 14 index futures contracts to reduce the total portfolio beta to 0.6.

Macaulay duration is the weighted average of the present value of payments received on a bond, weighted by the year in which the payments are received. If the yield curve changes shape, it will change the present values of the coupons and therefore also the Macaulay duration. Statement I is therefore not correct. However, if the bond were to be a zero-coupon bond, changes in the curve will not affect its duration so long as the interest rate at maturity stays constant.

Modified duration = Macaulay Duration/(1 + rate/compounding frequency). Therefore modified duration will change if the compounding frequency changes, assuming the nominal rate of interest for the coupons are identical. Therefore statement II is correct. When rates are expressed as continuously compounded rates, modified duration and Macaulay duration will be identical. This intuitively follows from the formula for modified duration: Modified duration = Macaulay Duration/(1 + rate/compounding frequency). For continuously compounded rates, the compounding frequency approaches infinity, so the denominator approaches 1, leaving modified duration equal to the Macaulay duration. Therefore statement III is correct.

Convexity is higher for a bond that has its payments spread out compared to a bond that has its payments concentrated at a single point in time. For a bond with a higher coupon, the higher coupons have the effect of spreading the present value of the bond over a longer period, when compared to a bond with lower coupons where the payment is comparatively more concentrated at the maturity. Therefore Convexity is higher for a bond with a lower coupon when compared to a similar bond with a higher coupon. Statement IV is not correct.

The highest possible transformation line, ie the transformation line with the maximum slope, is the transformation line joining the risk free rate on the y-axis and the portfolio with the maximum Sharpe ratio on the efficient frontier. This line is called the ' capital markets line ' . Investors can pick any point on this line according to their risk appetite, and doing so would maximize the return they can obtain for their desired level of risk. The capital markets line is tangential to the efficient frontier. The Sharpe ratio stays constant throughout the CML. Therefore statement IV is not true, while the rest are.