NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6 Dumps With Exact Questions and Answers

According to the FortiOS 7.6 High Availability (HA) Administration Guide and FGCP (FortiGate Clustering Protocol) requirements, the correct answers are B and D.

FGCP HA Cluster Mandatory Requirements (FortiOS 7.6)

When forming an HA cluster using FGCP, FortiGate devices must meet several strict compatibility and configuration requirements. Among the options given, the following two are mandatory:

✅ B. They must have the same number of configured VDOMs

In FortiOS HA, all cluster members must have the same VDOM configuration.

This includes:

Same number of VDOMs

Same VDOM names

This is required so configuration synchronization can occur correctly between members.

If VDOM counts differ, HA formation will fail.

✔ This is explicitly required and documented.

✅ D. They must have the same HA group ID

The HA group ID uniquely identifies an HA cluster on the network.

All FortiGate units intended to join the same cluster must share the same HA group ID.

If the group IDs differ, devices will not recognize each other as cluster peers.

✔ This is a fundamental FGCP requirement.

Why the Other Options Are Incorrect

❌ A. They must have the same hard drive configuration

Hard drive presence or size does not have to match for FGCP HA to function.

Disk differences may affect logging behavior, but they do not prevent HA cluster formation.

Therefore, this is not a required condition.

❌ C. They must have the heartbeat interfaces in the same subnet

Heartbeat interfaces must be:

Directly connected

In the same Layer 2 broadcast domain

They do not require IP addressing or being in the same IP subnet.

In many deployments, heartbeat interfaces have no IP addresses at all.

Therefore, “same subnet” is not a documented requirement.

According to the FortiOS 7.6 Troubleshooting and Administration guides, the diagnose debug flow command provides a step-by-step trace of how the FortiGate unit processes a packet.

First, the line "find a route: flag=00000000 gw-0.0.0.0 via port2" indicates that during the routing table lookup, the FortiGate matched the destination against its default route (represented by 0.0.0.0) and determined that the egress interface is port2. This confirms that the default gateway for this traffic is reachable via port2 (Statement A).

Second, the debug trace concludes with the messages "policy-2 Is matched, act-drop" and "Denied by forward policy check (policy 2)". This explicitly indicates that the packet successfully matched the criteria for firewall policy ID 2, and the action configured for that policy is set to Deny (Statement D).

Statement B is incorrect because a Reverse Path Forwarding (RPF) failure would be indicated by a specific "reverse path check fail, drop" message, which is absent here. Statement C is incorrect because the output shows "proto=1", which corresponds to ICMP (Ping) traffic. UDP traffic would be identified as protocol 17.

In FortiOS 7.6, if an administrator wants to block traffic only after an IPS signature is triggered a specific number of times within a defined time window, this must be done using IPS filters with rate-based settings.

Why option D is correct

IPS filters allow administrators to match signatures based on attributes such as:

Severity

Protocol

CVE

Signature ID

IPS filters support rate-based actions using:

rate-mode periodical

rate-count

rate-duration

With rate-mode periodical, FortiGate:

Counts how many times a signature is triggered

Within a defined time period

And applies the configured action (for example, block) once the threshold is exceeded

This directly matches the requirement:

“block traffic that triggers the signature set number of times during a specific time period.”

Why the other options are incorrect

A. IPS group signatures, set rate-mode 60Group signatures do not provide the required per-period rate-based blocking logic.

B. IPS packet logging optionLogging does not enforce blocking behavior.

C. IPS signatures, rate-mode periodical optionRate-based controls are applied via IPS filters, not directly on individual signature definitions.