Troubleshooting SSL connection resets often involves verifying license limits against actual resource utilization. F5 devices use a "Transactions Per Second" (TPS) license to control the amount of SSL processing the device can handle. The log entry SSL transaction (TPS) rate limit reached is a clear indicator that the traffic volume has exceeded the licensed capacity. When determining the necessary license level, it is important to know that F5 primarily licenses and limits the "Client-side" SSL TPS—which represents the encrypted connections between the users and the virtual servers. In this specific scenario, the peak demand reached 1200 client-side transactions per second. Although there were also 800 server-side transactions (re-encryption from the BIG-IP to the pool), these typically do not count against the primary TPS license limit in the same manner. Therefore, to ensure that the virtual server works as expected during peak load, the administrator must upgrade the license to at least 1200 TPS. This troubleshooting process links system log errors to license-enforced resource constraints.

To collect application-layer details such asHTTP status codes(200, 404, 500, etc.) andHTTP methods(GET, POST, PUT, DELETE), the BIG-IP system must use a profile designed for traffic visibility and reporting rather than basic traffic handling. TheAnalytics profile (Option C)is the correct choice because it is specifically designed to collect, store, and present detailed statistics about HTTP and TCP traffic passing through a virtual server.

When an Analytics profile is attached to a virtual server, BIG-IP can record metrics such as HTTP response codes, request methods, URI paths, latency, throughput, and client-side/server-side performance data. These statistics are then accessible through the BIG-IP GUI underStatistics → Analytics, allowing administrators to validate application behavior and troubleshoot performance or functional issues.

TheHTTP profile (Option B)enables HTTP protocol awareness and features like header insertion and compression, but it does not provide historical or statistical reporting of HTTP methods and response codes.Request Adapt (Option A)is used for ICAP-based content adaptation, not visibility.Statistics (Option D)is not a standalone profile and does not provide HTTP-level insight.

Therefore, the Analytics profile is the only default profile that fulfills this requirement.

Uneven load balancing on a BIG-IP system typically occurs when traffic is not distributed evenly across all available pool members. One common reason is thatmonitors have marked down multiple pool members (Option B). When health monitors fail for specific pool members, BIG-IP automatically removes those members from load-balancing decisions. As a result, traffic is sent only to the remaining healthy member, creating the appearance that load balancing is not functioning correctly. This behavior is expected and aligns with BIG-IP’s design to ensure traffic is sent only to healthy resources.

Another frequent cause isthe presence of a persistence profile on the pool or virtual server (Option C). Persistence (such as source address or cookie persistence) forces subsequent client connections to be sent to the same pool member for session continuity. While persistence is critical for certain applications, it can override the load-balancing algorithm and cause most or all traffic to be directed to a single pool member, especially during low traffic volumes or testing scenarios.

The other options are incorrect because avirtual server marked down (Option A)would not pass traffic at all, andall pool members marked down (Option D)would result in no connections rather than uneven distribution. This analysis follows standard BIG-IP troubleshooting methodology using pool status, monitor results, and persistence configuration review.

When a BIG-IP device group shows aChanges Pendingstatus, it indicates that one or more devices in the group have configuration changes that have not yet been synchronized to the other members. To identifywhich device has the most recent (authoritative) configuration, the administrator must view the detailed synchronization status at thedevice group level.

The correct location isDevice Management > Device Groups (Option D). Within this menu, the BIG-IP Configuration Utility displays each device group along with its synchronization status and provides details about which device has pending changes. From this view, the administrator can clearly see which device is marked as havingchanges pending, making it the source device that should be used to initiate aSync to Groupoperation.

The other options do not provide the required level of detail:

Device Management > Overview (Option A)shows general HA status but not configuration ownership.

Device Management > Devices (Option B)lists devices but does not clearly identify which one holds unsynchronized changes.

System > High Availability (Option C)focuses on failover and traffic groups, not configuration sync state.

This workflow aligns with BIG-IP best practices for configuration synchronization and ensures changes are propagated correctly without overwriting newer configurations.

In F5 TMOS administration, the traffic flow is processed through specific event huddles w3ithin iRules. To troubleshoot or m4odify traffic based on a URI (Uniform Resource Identifier), the BIG-IP system must first parse the application-layer data. The HTTP_REQUEST event is triggered when the system has fully received and parsed the HTTP request headers from the client5. This is the correct point to implement logic that selects a pool or pool member based on the path or file requested (e.g., /images or /api). Using CLIENT_ACCEPTED would be too early in the troubleshooting process because that event triggers at the L4 (TCP) connection establishment phase, before any URI information is available6. Conversely, HTTP_RESPONSE occurs during the return traffic from the server, which is too late to make a load balancing decision7. For troubleshooting virtual server behavior where URIs are involved, ensuring the iRule is attached to a Virtual Server with an HTTP profile and using the HTTP_REQUEST event is essential for proper traffic steering and inspection.

The issue is caused by the Source Address restriction configured on the virtual server.

Source Filter: The configuration contains the line source 192.168.0.0/16. This acts as an implicit Access Control List (ACL). The virtual server will only accept and process TCP connections if the client's source IP address falls within the 192.168.x.x range.

Why Ping Works: ICMP (Ping) is handled by the Virtual Address object, not the Virtual Server object. Unless ICMP is specifically disabled on the Virtual Address, it will respond to pings from any subnet, even if the Virtual Server itself is restricted by a source filter or is even disabled.

Evaluation of Other Options:

Disabled (Option A): If the VS were disabled, the configuration would typically show disabled or state down, and the symptoms would be similar, but the source filter is a more specific "misconfiguration" in this context.

Port 80 (Option C): The configuration destination 10.99.20.50:http explicitly confirms it is listening on port 80.

Unallowed Subnet: If a client from a different network (e.g., 10.10.1.5) tries to connect, the BIG-IP will silently drop the connection or send a reset because it does not match the defined source criteria.

To ensure a support case is processed and routed efficiently, F5 specifies a mandatory set of baseline information.

Serial Number: Required to verify the support contract and entitlement level for the hardware or virtual edition.

QKView: This is described as the "first and most important thing to have when opening a case". It provides the F5 Support Engineer with the necessary diagnostic data to understand the system's current state and resource utilization.

Problem Description: A precise description of the issue, including symptoms, when the problem started, and the business impact, is critical for routing the case to the correct technical team.

Contact Info: Accurate contact information for the individual who will be working on the ticket with F5.

Comparison: While packet captures (Option A) or UCS files (Option B) are often useful, they are not strictly required for the initial opening of all support tickets; however, a QKView is considered a primary prerequisite for technical analysis.