In ITIL 4, deployment tools are specifically designed to automate the transportation and installation of configuration items (CIs) into various environments, including test environments. These tools ensure consistency, repeatability, and efficiency in deployment processes, which are critical for managing CIs during testing phases.

Option A (Deployment tools):Correct, as deployment tools (e.g., Jenkins, Ansible, or Terraform for certain use cases) are tailored for automating the movement and installation of CIs, ensuring they are correctly placed in test environments with minimal manual intervention.

Option B (Environment configuration and management tools):While these tools (e.g., Puppet, Chef) manage environment settings, their primary focus is on configuring and maintaining environments, not transporting or installing CIs, making them less relevant here.

Option C (Work planning and prioritization tools):Tools like Jira or Trello focus on task management and prioritization, not on automating CI deployment, so this option is incorrect.

Option D (Service configuration management tools):These tools manage relationships and data about CIs in a configuration management database (CMDB), not the physical transport or installation of CIs, ruling out this option.

ITIL 4 defines capability level 3 for a practice as achieving integration across the organization, where the practice is embedded into broader workflows and understood by related practices. For deployment management, an indication of reaching capability level 3 is when employees from other practices understand how deployment activities are integrated into relevant workflows (Option B). This demonstrates cross-functional alignment and maturity, showing that deployment management is not siloed but part of the organization’s value streams.

Option A (The deployment management team regularly suggests and implements improvement opportunities):Incorrect, as continual improvement is characteristic of higher capability levels (e.g., level 4), not the defining feature of level 3.

Option B (Employees from other practices understand how deployment activities are integrated into relevant workflows):Correct, as level 3 focuses on integration and collaboration across practices, per ITIL 4’s capability framework.

Option C (The deployment manager is able to report on the effectiveness of the deployment management practice):Incorrect, as reporting effectiveness is a general management task, not specific to level 3 maturity.

Option D (Deployment models are developed and implemented):Incorrect, as model development occurs at lower capability levels (e.g., level 1 or 2), not a hallmark of level 3.

ITIL 4 encourages collaborative and flexible relationships with suppliers to enhance deployment management, focusing on value co-creation rather than rigid controls. Option D is not aligned with this approach, as overly detailed and rigorous procedures can hinder adaptability and innovation in supplier relationships.

Option A (Considering dependencies on third parties when analyzing service value streams which include deployment management):Correct practice, as understanding supplier dependencies ensures effective integration of deployment activities into value streams.

Option B (Carefully selecting suppliers of software tools for CI/CD pipeline):Correct, as choosing reliable suppliers for CI/CD tools is critical to building a robust deployment management practice.

Option C (Involving third parties in review and planning of the value streams that include deployment management):Correct, as supplier involvement in planning fosters collaboration and ensures alignment with deployment goals.

Option D (Developing and enforcing detailed and rigorous procedures for every interaction between suppliers and the organization):Incorrect, as this approach is overly prescriptive and contradicts ITIL 4’s emphasis on flexible, value-focused supplier relationships. It risks stifling collaboration and innovation.