To provide the most high-performing experience for the users of the application, a solutions architect should use a latency routing policy for the Route 53 A record. This policy allows Route 53 to route traffic to the AWS Region that provides the lowest possible latency for the users1. A latency routing policy can also improve the availability of the application, as Route 53 can automatically route traffic to another Region if the primary Region becomes unavailable2.

For standard accelerators, Global Accelerator uses the AWS global network to route traffic to the optimal regional endpoint based on health, client location, and policies that you configure, which increases the availability of your applications. Endpoints for standard accelerators can be Network Load Balancers, Application Load Balancers, Amazon EC2 instances, or Elastic IP addresses that are located in one AWS Region or multiple Regions.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/global-accelerator/latest/dg/what-is-global-accelerator.html

The least outstanding requests (LOR) algorithm is a load balancing algorithm that distributes incoming requests to the target with the fewest outstanding requests. This helps to avoid overloading any single target and improves the overall performance and availability of the web application. The LOR algorithmcan use the RequestCount and TargetResponseTime CloudWatch metrics to determine the number of outstanding requests and the response time of each target. These metrics measure the number of requests processed by each target and the time elapsed after the request leaves the load balancer until a response from the target is received by the load balancer, respectively. By using these metrics, the LOR algorithm can route new requests to the targets that are less busy and more responsive, and avoid sending requests to the targets that are already overloaded or slow. This solution meets the requirements of the company.

AWS Snowball is a petabyte-scale data transport service that uses secure devices to transfer large amounts of data into and out of the AWS Cloud. Snowball addresses common challenges with large-scale data transfers including high network costs, long transfer times, and security concerns. AWS Snowball can transfer up to 80 TB of data per device, and multiple devices can be used in parallel to meet the migration deadline. AWS Snowball is more cost-effective than AWS Snowmobile, which is designed for exabyte-scale data transfers, or Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration, which is optimized for fast transfers over long distances. Amazon S3 VPC endpoint does not increase the upload speed, but only provides a secure and private connection between the VPC and S3. References: AWS Snowball, AWS Snowmobile, Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration, Amazon S3 VPC endpoint

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/whitepapers/latest/aws-vpc-connectivity-options/aws-direct-connect-aws-transit-gateway.html

https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/cloudfront-access-to-amazon-s3/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudFront/latest/DeveloperGuide/private-content-restricting-access-to-s3.html#private-content-restricting-access-to-s3-overview

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/InstanceStorage.html

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/networking-and-content-delivery/deliver-your-apps-dynamic-content-using-amazon-cloudfront-getting-started-template/

High availability can be enabled for this architecture quite simply by modifying the existing Auto Scaling group to use multiple availability zones. The ASG will automatically balance the load so you don't actually need to specify the instances per AZ.

These options are the most suitable ways to configure the network architecture to provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Option A enables and configures enhanced networking on each EC2 instance, which is a feature that improves the network performance of the instance by providing higher bandwidth, lower latency, and lower jitter. Enhanced networking uses single root I/O virtualization (SR-IOV) or Elastic Fabric Adapter (EFA) to provide direct access to the network hardware. You can enable and configure enhanced networking by choosing a supported instance type and a compatible operating system, and installing the required drivers. Option C runs the EC2 instances in a cluster placement group, which is a logical grouping of instanceswithin a single Availability Zone that are placed close together on the same underlying hardware. Cluster placement groups provide the lowest network latency and the highest network throughput among the placement group options. You can run the EC2 instances in a cluster placement group by creating a placement group and launching the instances into it.

Option B is not suitable because grouping the EC2 instances in separate accounts does not provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Separate accounts are used to isolate and organize resources for different purposes, such as security, billing, or compliance. However, they do not affect the network performance or proximity of the instances. Moreover, grouping the EC2 instances in separate accounts would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would require setting up cross-account networking and permissions.

Option D is not suitable because attaching multiple elastic network interfaces to each EC2 instance does not provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Elastic network interfaces are virtual network interfaces that can be attached to EC2 instances to provide additional network capabilities, such as multiple IP addresses, multiple subnets, or enhanced security. However, they do not affect the network performance or proximity of the instances. Moreover, attaching multiple elastic network interfaces to each EC2 instance would consume additional resources and limit the instance type choices.

Option E is not suitable because using Amazon EBS optimized instance types does not provide the lowest possible latency between nodes. Amazon EBS optimized instance types are instances that provide dedicated bandwidth for Amazon EBS volumes, which are block storage volumes that can be attached to EC2 instances. EBS optimized instance types improve the performance and consistency of the EBS volumes, but they do not affect the network performance or proximity of the instances. Moreover, using EBS optimized instance types would incur additional costs and may not be necessary for the streaming data workload. References:

Enhanced networking on Linux

Placement groups

Elastic network interfaces

Amazon EBS-optimized instances

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams in on-demand mode is purpose-built for real-time ingestion of streaming data and scales automatically with traffic, which is ideal for fluctuating workloads like clickstream data.

Combined with AWS Lambda, which scales concurrently based on incoming events, this setup ensures efficient, real-time processing with minimal configuration and cost overhead.

Option B involves Firehose, which is not optimal for low-latency processing. Option C is incorrect as Kinesis Video Streams is designed for video data, not clickstream. Option D introduces Flink, which adds unnecessary complexity when Lambda suffices.

The most cost-effective solution for the online video game company is to configure a Network Load Balancer with the required protocol and ports for the internet traffic and specify the EC2 instances as the targets. This solution will enable the company to handle millions of UDP requests per second with ultra-low latency and high performance.

A Network Load Balancer is a type of Elastic Load Balancing that operates at the connection level (Layer 4) and routes traffic to targets (EC2 instances, microservices, or containers) within Amazon VPC based on IP protocol data. A Network Load Balancer is ideal for load balancing of both TCP and UDP traffic, as it is capable of handling millions of requests per second while maintaining high throughput at ultra-low latency. A Network Load Balancer also preserves the source IP address of the clients to the back-end applications, which can be useful for logging or security purposes1.

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is cost-effective, as it only charges for the storage and data transfer of the replicated objects, and does not require any additional AWS services or custom scripts. S3 Same-Region Replication (SRR) is a feature that automatically replicates objects across S3 buckets within the same AWS Region. SRR can help you aggregate logs from multiple sources to a single destination for analysis and auditing. SRR also preserves the metadata, encryption, and access control of the source objects.

It is operationally efficient, as it does not require any manual intervention or scheduling. SRR replicates objects as soon as they are uploaded to the source bucket, ensuring that the destination bucket always has the latest log data. SRR also handles any updates or deletions of the source objects, keeping the destination bucket in sync. SRR can be enabled with a few clicks in the S3 console or with a simple API call.

It is secure, as it does not allow the logs to leave the us-west-2 Region. SRR only replicates objects within the same AWS Region, ensuring that the data sovereignty and compliance requirements are met. SRR also supports encryption of the source and destination objects, using either server-side encryption with AWS KMS or S3-managed keys, or client-side encryption.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Amazon RDS for MySQL supports the creation of read replicas, which are read-only copies of the primary database instance. By offloading read-heavy operations, such as reporting queries, to a read replica:

Performance Improvement: The primary DB instance is relieved from the additional load, reducing the likelihood of timeouts during order processing.

Data Consistency: Read replicas use asynchronous replication, ensuring that they have up-to-date data for accurate reporting.

Scalability: Multiple read replicas can be created to handle increased read traffic.

This approach allows employees to continue running necessary reports without impacting the performance of the ordering application.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/rds-custom.htmlandhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/working-with-custom-oracle.html

This solution meets the requirements of running a gaming application that transmits data by using UDP packets and scaling out and in as traffic increases and decreases. A Network Load Balancer can handle millions of requests per second while maintaining high throughput at ultra low latency, and it supports both TCP and UDP protocols. An Auto Scaling group can automatically adjust the number of EC2 instances based on the demand and the scaling policies.

Option B is incorrect because an Application Load Balancer does not support UDP protocol, only HTTP and HTTPS. Option C is incorrect because Amazon Route 53 is a DNS service that can route traffic based on different policies, but it does not provide load balancing or scaling capabilities. Option D is incorrect because a NAT instance is used to enable instances in a private subnet to connect to the internet or other AWS services, but it does not provide load balancing or scaling capabilities.

Using a Lambda function as part of the Kinesis Data Firehose pipeline allows for real-time detection and masking of PII before data is written to S3. This ensures that PII is never stored in its raw form in the data lake.

Option B:Amazon Macie can scan and classify data but does not provide in-line PII masking for data ingestion.

Option C:Server-side encryption secures data but does not mask PII.

Option D:CloudHSM is unnecessary for PII masking and adds complexity without addressing the requirements.

AWS Documentation References:

Using Lambda with Kinesis Data Firehose

Detailed Explanation:

A. RDS:Suitable for relational databases but does not provide native support for data lakes or row-level access.

B. Redshift:Primarily for analytics, not designed for large-scale data lake governance.

C. S3 + Lake Formation:Provides native support for data lakes with granular access control, including row-level permissions.

D. Glue Catalog + DataBrew:Focused on data preparation and metadata management, not row-level access control.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/organizations/latest/userguide/orgs_manage_policies_scps_examples_vpc.html#example_vpc_2

The solution that will meet the requirements is to run the application on Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) as microservices with service auto scaling. This solution will allow the application to be flexible, scalable, and gradually improved, as well as minimize application downtime. By breaking down the monolithic application into microservices, the company can decouple the modules and update them independently, without affecting the whole application. By running the microservices on Amazon ECS, the company can leverage the benefits of containerization, such as portability, efficiency, and isolation. By enabling service auto scaling, the company can adjust the number of containers running for each microservice based on demand, ensuring optimal performance and cost. Amazon ECS also supports various deployment strategies, such as rolling update or blue/green deployment, that can reduce or eliminate downtime during updates.

The other solutions are not as effective as the first one because they either do not meet the requirements or introduce new challenges. Running the application on AWS Lambda as a single function with maximum provisioned concurrency will not meet the requirements, as it will not break down the monolith into microservices, nor will it reduce the complexity of maintenance. Lambda functions are also limited by execution time (15 minutes), memory size (10 GB), and concurrency quotas, which may not be sufficient for the report generation application. Running the application on Amazon EC2 Spot Instances as microservices with a Spot Fleet default allocation strategy will not meet the requirements, as it will introduce the risk of interruptions due to spot price fluctuations. Spot Instances are not guaranteed to be available or stable, and may be reclaimed by AWS at any time with a two-minute warning. This may cause report generation to fail or restart from scratch. Running the application on AWS Elastic Beanstalk as a single application environment with an all-at-once deployment strategy will not meet the requirements, as it will not break down the monolith into microservices, nor will it minimize application downtime. The all-at-once deployment strategy will deploy updates to all instances simultaneously, causing a brief outage for the application.

Amazon RDS for Oracle is a managed database service, which significantly reduces operational overhead compared to running Oracle on EC2 or on-premises. AWS Secrets Manager natively integrates with RDS and supports automatic, scheduled password rotation with minimal setup. You can configure the rotation schedule (including yearly), and Secrets Manager will handle the secure password storage and rotation workflow for you.

AWS Documentation Extract:

"AWS Secrets Manager helps you protect access to your applications, services, and IT resources without the upfront investment and on-going maintenance costs of operating your own infrastructure. You can configure automatic rotation for supported databases such as Amazon RDS for Oracle."

(Source: AWS Secrets Manager documentation)

A, C, D: These solutions require custom scripting, Lambda, and alarms, leading to more operational overhead.

To protect the web application from DDoS attacks originating from random IP addresses, a solutions architect should subscribe to AWS Shield Advanced and engage the AWS DDoS Response Team (DRT) to integrate mitigating controls into the service. AWS Shield Advanced is a managed service that provides protection against large and sophisticated DDoS attacks, with access to 24/7 support and response from the DRT. The DRT can help the city configure proactive and reactive safeguards, such as AWS WAF rules, rate-based rules, and network ACLs, to block malicious traffic and improve the application’s resilience. The service also provides an audit trail for the DDoS sources through detailed attack reports and Amazon CloudWatch metrics.

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams is a scalable and reliable service that can ingest, buffer, and process streaming data in real-time. It can handle large traffic spikes and preserve the order ofthe incoming data records. AWS Lambda is a serverless compute service that can process the data streams from Kinesis Data Streams without requiring any infrastructure management. It can also scale automatically to match the throughput of the data stream. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed, highly available, and fast NoSQL database that can store the processed updates from Lambda. It can also handle high write throughput and provide consistent performance. By using these services, the solutions architect can design a solution that meets the requirements of the company with the least operational overhead.

This solution meets the requirements because it uses the following components and features:

AWS Transfer Family SFTP internal server: This allows the application to securely transfer order files from the on-premises ERP system to AWS using the SFTP protocol over a private connection. The internal server is deployed in two Availability Zones for high availability and fault tolerance.

Amazon S3 storage: This provides scalable, durable, and cost-effective object storage for the order files. Amazon S3 also supports encryption at rest and in transit, as well as lifecycle policies and versioning for data protection and compliance.

AWS Lambda function: This enables the application to process the order files in a serverless manner, without provisioning or managing servers. The Lambda function can perform any custom logic or transformation on the order files, such as validating, parsing, or enriching the data.

Transfer Family managed workflow: This simplifies the orchestration of the file processing tasks by triggering the Lambda function as soon as a file is uploaded to the SFTP server. The managed workflow also provides error handling, retry policies, and logging capabilities.

A Network Load Balancer can be assigned one Elastic IP address for each Availability Zone it uses1. This allows the clients to reach the load balancer using a static IP address that can be authorized on their firewalls. An Application Load Balancer cannot be assigned an Elastic IP address2. An A record in an Amazon Route 53 hosted zone pointing to an Elastic IP address would not work because the load balancer would still use its own IP address as the source of the forwarded requests to the web service. An EC2 instance with a public IP address running as a proxy in front of the load balancer would add unnecessary complexity and cost, and would not provide the same scalability and availability as a Network Load Balancer. References: 1: Network Load Balancers - Elastic Load Balancing3, IP address type section2: How to assign Elastic IP to Application Load Balancer in AWS?4, answer section.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonRDS/latest/UserGuide/USER_RestoreFromSnapshot.html#USER_RestoreFromSnapshot.CON

Under "Encrypt unencrypted resources" -https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AWSEC2/latest/UserGuide/EBSEncryption.html

This solution meets the requirements of moving the files automatically, running Lambda functions on the copied data, and sending the data files to SageMaker Pipelines with the least operational overhead. S3 replication can copy the files from the initial S3 bucket to the analysis S3 bucket as they arrive. The analysis S3 bucket can send event notifications to Amazon EventBridge (Amazon CloudWatch Events) when an object is created.EventBridge can trigger Lambda and SageMaker Pipelines as targets for the ObjectCreated rule. Lambda can run pattern-matching code on the copied data, and SageMaker Pipelines can execute a pipeline with the data files.

Option A is incorrect because creating a Lambda function to copy the files to the analysis S3 bucket is not necessary when S3 replication can do that automatically. It also adds operational overhead to manage the Lambda function. Option B is incorrect because creating a Lambda function to copy the files to the analysis S3 bucket is not necessary when S3 replication can do that automatically. It also adds operational overhead to manage the Lambda function. Option C is incorrect because using S3 event notification with multiple destinations can result in throttling or delivery failures if there are too many events.

Requirement Analysis: The company needs highly available, scalable storage for a document management application without modifying the application during migration.

EFS Overview: Amazon EFS provides scalable file storage that can be mounted concurrently on multiple EC2 instances across different Availability Zones.

EFS Standard-IA: Using the Standard-IA storage class helps reduce costs for infrequently accessed data while maintaining high availability and scalability.

Implementation:

Create an EFS file system.

Configure mount targets in multiple Availability Zones to ensure high availability.

Mount the EFS file system on EC2 instances in the Auto Scaling group.

Conclusion: This solution meets the high availability, scalability, and cost-effectiveness requirements without needing application modifications.

References

Amazon EFS:Amazon EFS Documentation

EFS Storage Classes:Amazon EFS Storage Classes

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is operationally efficient, as it only requires one activation of the cost allocation tag and one creation of the cost report from the management account, which has access to all the member accounts’ data and billing preferences.

It is consistent, as it uses the AWS-defined cost allocation tag named department, which is automatically applied to resources when the company creates tags using the tagging policy enforced by AWS Organizations. This ensures that the tag name and value are the same across all the resources and accounts, and avoids any discrepancies or errors that might arise from user-defined tags.

It is informative, as it creates one cost report in Cost Explorer grouping by the tag name, and filters by EC2. This allows the accounting team to see the breakdown of EC2 consumption and costs by department, regardless of the AWS account. The team can also use other features of Cost Explorer, such as charts, filters, and forecasts, to analyze and optimize the spending.

To protect against a Regional failure, the application must be deployed in multiple Regions. Amazon Route 53 DNS failover with health checks allows traffic to be automatically routed to a healthy Region when the primary becomes unavailable, meeting high availability and disaster recovery requirements.

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is cost-effective, as it only uses serverless components that are charged based on usage and do not require any upfront provisioning or maintenance.

It is scalable, as it can handle any number of recipe records that are uploaded to the S3 bucket without any performance degradation or manual intervention.

It is easy to implement, as it does not require any machine learning knowledge or complex data processing logic. Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing service that can automatically extract entities such as ingredients from text files. The Lambda function can simply invoke the Comprehend API and store the results in the DynamoDB table.

It is reliable, as it can handle non-food records and errors gracefully. Amazon Comprehend can detect the language and domain of the text files and return an appropriate response. The Lambda function can also implement error handling and logging mechanisms to ensure the data quality and integrity.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to migrate applications to AWS, maintaining isolated networks while allowing communication with a shared services VPC and among the applications.

Analysis of Options:

Software VPN Tunnels: This approach involves high administrative overhead and complexity in managing multiple VPN connections.

VPC Peering: While suitable for smaller numbers of VPCs, it becomes complex and hard to manage at scale with over 100 applications.

Direct Connect: Primarily used for high-bandwidth, low-latency connections to on-premises networks, not inter-VPC communication.

Transit Gateway: Simplifies network management by acting as a central hub, allowing easy routing and scalability as more applications are migrated.

Best Solution:

Transit Gateway: This provides a scalable, efficient solution with minimal administrative overhead for managing network connections between multiple VPCs and the shared services VPC.

The solution that meets the requirements with the most operational efficiency is to configure public subnets in the existing VPC and deploy an MSK cluster in the public subnets. This solution allows the data ingestion solution to be publicly available over the internet without creating a new VPC or deploying a load balancer. The solution also ensures that the data intransit is encrypted by enabling mutual TLS authentication, which requires both the client and the server to present certificates for verification. This solution leverages the public access feature of Amazon MSK, which is available for clusters running Apache Kafka 2.6.0 or later versions1.

The other solutions are not as efficient as the first one because they either create unnecessary resources or do not encrypt the data in transit. Creating a new VPC with public subnets would incur additional costs and complexity for managing network resources and routing. Deploying an ALB or an NLB would also add more costs and latency for the data ingestion solution. Moreover, an ALB or an NLB would not encrypt thedata in transit by itself, unless they are configured with HTTPS listeners and certificates, which would require additional steps and maintenance. Therefore, these solutions are not optimal for the given requirements.

To make all the data available to various teams and minimize operational overhead, the company can create a data lake by using AWS Lake Formation. This will allow the company to centralize all the data in one place and use fine-grained access controls to manage access to the data. To meet the requirements of the company, the solutions architect can create a data lake by using AWS Lake Formation, create an AWS Glue JDBC connection to Amazon RDS, and register the S3 bucket in Lake Formation. The solutions architect can then use Lake Formation access controls to limit access to the data. This solution will provide the ability to manage fine-grained permissions for the data and minimize operational overhead.

https://aws.amazon.com/storagegateway/file/

File Gateway provides a seamless way to connect to the cloud in order to store application data files and backup images as durable objects in Amazon S3 cloud storage. File Gateway offers SMB or NFS-based access to data in Amazon S3 with local caching. It can be used for on-premises applications, and for Amazon EC2-based applications that need file protocol access to S3 object storage.

https://aws.amazon.com/storagegateway/volume/

Volume Gateway presents cloud-backed iSCSI block storage volumes to your on-premises applications. Volume Gateway stores and manages on-premises data in Amazon S3 on your behalf and operates in either cache mode or stored mode. In the cached Volume Gateway mode, your primary data is stored in Amazon S3, while retaining your frequently accessed data locally in the cache for low latency access.

To achieve high availability for the website, two key actions should be taken:

Amazon RDS for MySQL Multi-AZ: By migrating the database to an RDS for MySQL Multi-AZ deployment, the database becomes highly available. Multi-AZ provides automatic failover from the primary database to a standby replica in another Availability Zone, ensuring database availability even in the case of an AZ failure.

Application Load Balancer and Auto Scaling: Deploying an Application Load Balancer (ALB) in front of the EC2 instances ensures that traffic is evenly distributed across the instances. Configuring an Auto Scaling group to run EC2 instances across multiple Availability Zones ensures that the application remains available even if one instance or one AZ becomes unavailable. This setup enhances fault tolerance and improves reliability.

Why Not Other Options?:

Option A (Internet Gateway per AZ): Internet Gateways are region-wide resources and do not need to be provisioned per Availability Zone. This option does not contribute to high availability.

Option C (DynamoDB + Auto Scaling): DynamoDB would require changes to the application code to switch from MySQL, which is not possible per the question's constraints.

Option D (DataSync): AWS DataSync is used for data transfer and synchronization, not for achieving high availability for a database.

AWS References:

Amazon RDS Multi-AZ Deployments- Explanation of how Multi-AZ deployments work in Amazon RDS.

Application Load Balancing- Details on how to configure and use ALB for distributing traffic across multiple instances.

Amazon AppFlow is a fully managed integration service that enables users to transfer data securely between SaaS applications and AWS services. It supports Salesforce as a source and Amazon S3 as a destination. It also supports encryption of data at rest using AWS KMS CMKs and encryption of data in transit using SSL/TLS1. By using Amazon AppFlow, the solution can meet the requirements with the least development effort.

A. Create AWS Lambda functions to transfer the data securely from Salesforce to Amazon S3. This solution will not meet the requirement of the least development effort, as it involves writing custom code to interact with Salesforce and Amazon S3 APIs, handle authentication, encryption, error handling, and monitoring2.

B. Create an AWS Step Functions workflow Define the task to transfer the data securely from Salesforce to Amazon S3. This solution will not meet the requirement of the least development effort, as it involves creating a state machine definition to orchestrate the data transfer task, and invoking Lambda functions or other services to perform the actual data transfer3.

D. Create a custom connector for Salesforce to transfer the data securely from Salesforce to Ama-zon S3. This solution will not meet the requirement of the least development effort, as it involves using the Amazon AppFlow Custom Connector SDK to build and deploy acustom connector for Salesforce, which requires additional configuration and management.

Reference URL: https://aws.amazon.com/appflow/

AWS Elastic Beanstalk provides an easy and quick way to deploy, manage, and scale applications. It supports a variety of platforms, including Java and Apache Tomcat. By using Elastic Beanstalk, the solutions architect can upload the Java application and configure the environment to run Apache Tomcat.

SSE-S3 - is free and uses AWS owned CMKs (CMK = Customer Master Key). The encryption key is owned and managed by AWS, and is shared among many accounts. Its rotation is automatic with time that varies as shown in the table here. The time is not explicitly defined.

SSE-KMS - has two flavors:

AWS managed CMK. This is free CMK generated only for your account. You can only view it policies and audit usage, but not manage it. Rotation is automatic - once per 1095 days (3 years),

Customer managed CMK. This uses your own key that you create and can manage. Rotation is not enabled by default. But if you enable it, it will be automatically rotated every 1 year. This variant can also use an imported key material by you. If you create such key with an imported material, there is no automated rotation. Only manual rotation.

SSE-C - customer provided key. The encryption key is fully managed by you outside of AWS. AWS will not rotate it.

This solution meets the requirements of moving data to an Amazon S3 bucket, encrypting the data when it is stored in the S3 bucket, and automatically rotating the encryption key every year with the least operational overhead. AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) is a service that enables you to create and manage encryption keys for your data. A customer managed key is a symmetric encryption key that you create and manage in AWS KMS. You can enable automatic key rotation for a customer managed key, which means that AWS KMS generates new cryptographic material for the key every year. You can set the S3 bucket’s default encryption behavior to use the customer managed KMS key, which means that any object that is uploaded to the bucket without specifying an encryption method will be encrypted with that key.

Option A is incorrect because using server-side encryption with Amazon S3 managed encryption keys (SSE-S3) does not allow you to control or manage the encryption keys. SSE-S3 uses a unique key for each object, and encrypts that key with a master key that is regularly rotated by S3. However, you cannot enable or disable key rotation for SSE-S3 keys, or specify the rotation interval. Option C is incorrect because manually rotating the KMS key every year can increase the operational overhead and complexity, and it may not meet the requirement of rotating the key every year if you forget or delay the rotationprocess. Option D is incorrect because encrypting the data with customer key material before moving the data to the S3 bucket can increase the operational overhead and complexity, and it may not provide consistent encryption for all objects in the bucket. Creating a KMS key without key material and importing the customer key material into the KMS key can enable you to use your own source of random bits to generate your KMS keys, but it does not support automatic key rotation.

In this scenario, the application generates dynamic, single-use files that are distributed via CloudFront. Since the application source code cannot be changed, modifying the files at the origin or altering the generation process is not possible.

AWS CloudFront caching is designed to reduce data transfer costs by caching responses at edge locations closer to users. Enabling caching for the CloudFront distribution can store the files temporarily at the edge, minimizing repeated data transfers from the origin and thereby lowering costs. Although these files are single-use, CloudFront can be configured with appropriate cache-control headers or TTL (time-to-live) values to cache files for even short periods, which reduces data transfer.

Lambda@Edge (Option A) can compress files but requires modification of responses and adds operational complexity. Also, it may not be as cost-effective as caching, especially if files are large or numerous. Amazon S3 Transfer Acceleration (Option B) optimizes data transfer into S3 but doesn’t reduce transfer costs from CloudFront. Multipart uploads (Option D) are used to optimize large file uploads and do not impact cost related to distribution or caching.

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

The requirement is toprevent Application A from sending traffic to Application B.

Understanding AWS Network Security Components:

Security Groups

Stateful(if traffic is allowed in one direction, it is automatically allowed in the reverse).

Do not support explicit deny rules, onlyallow rules.

Not suitable for blocking traffic in this scenario.

Network ACLs (NACLs)

Stateless(must define explicit rules for both inbound and outbound traffic).

Support explicit DENY rules.

Best suited for blocking traffic between subnets.

Analysis of the Options:

Option A: Deny Outbound Rule in Security Group for Application B❌(Incorrect)

Security Groups do not support explicit deny rules.

Does not block traffic from Application A to Application B.

Option B: Deny Outbound Rule in Security Group for Application A❌(Incorrect)

Security Groups do not support explicit deny rules.

Cannot effectively prevent Application A from sending traffic to Application B.

Option C: Deny Outbound Rule in NACL for Application B Subnet❌(Incorrect)

This wouldprevent Application B from sending traffic, butthe requirement is to block traffic from Application A to Application B.

Incorrect subnet is being modified.

Option D: Deny Outbound Rule in NACL for Application A Subnet✅(Correct Choice)

Prevents Application A from sending traffic to Application B by blocking outbound requests at the network level.

Effectively stops communication from A to B at the subnet level.

Why Option D is the Best Choice?

✅NACLs support explicit deny rules, unlike security groups.✅Blocks outbound traffic from Application A before it reaches Application B.✅Works at the subnet level, making it scalable.

Purchasing a Compute Savings Plan for the minimum baseline usage ensures cost savings. Using On-Demand Instances for peak times ensures flexibility without over-provisioning. S3 Lifecycle policies enable automatic transition of objects to lower-cost storage classes such as S3 Glacier orS3 Intelligent-Tiering, further reducing storage costs.

This approach ensures that the order creation and payment processing steps are separate and atomic. By sending the order information to an SQS FIFO queue, the payment service can process the order one at a time and in the order they were received. If the payment service is unable to process an order, it can be retried later, preventing the creation of multiple orders. The deletion of the message from the queue after it is processed will prevent the same message from being processed multiple times.

Option B: FSx for Lustre is designed for HPC workloads with high IOPS.

Option E: A cluster placement group ensures low-latency networking for HPC analytics workloads.

Option A: Amazon EFS is not optimized for HPC.

Option D: Mountpoint for S3 does not meet high IOPS needs.

AWS Glue jobs are designed for extract, transform, and load (ETL) operations, which are perfect for transforming clinical trial data. AWS Glue integrates with AWS Key Management Service (KMS), allowing for customer-specific encryption keys, fulfilling the encryption requirement with minimal operational effort. Client-side encryption with AWS KMS ensures that the data is encrypted before it is sent to S3, aligning with the security needs specified in the scenario.

Key aspects:

AWS Glue: This managed ETL service simplifies data transformation, reduces operational overhead, and integrates seamlessly with KMS.

CSE-KMS: Client-side encryption with KMS ensures that the data is encrypted with customer-specific keys before it is processed or stored in S3, offering robust security​​.

Minimal Operational Overhead: Compared to managing an EMR cluster, AWS Glue automates much of the process, making it a lower-effort solution.

AWS Documentation: According to the AWS Well-Architected Framework, encryption with AWS KMS offers strong security controls that meet the needs of industries requiring high levels of confidentiality​​.

 This solution meets the requirements with the least operational overhead because it uses AWS services that are fully managed and scalable. The EventBridge rule can detect the DeleteKey operation from the AWS KMS API and trigger the Systems Manager Automation runbook, which can execute a predefined workflow to cancel the key deletion. The EventBridge rule can also publish an SNS message to the topic that sends an email notification to the administrators. This way, the company can prevent the accidental deletion of KMS keys and notify the administrators of any attempts to delete them.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Config rules are used to evaluate the configuration of AWS resources, not to cancel the deletion of KMS keys. Option B is not a valid solution because it requires creating and maintaining a custom Lambda function that has logic to prevent KMS key deletion, which adds operational overhead. Option D is not a valid solution because it only notifies the administrators of the DeleteKey operation, but does not cancel it.

https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/big-data/top-10-performance-tuning-tips-for-amazon-athena/

This solution meets the requirements of measuring the effectiveness of marketing campaigns by performing batch processing on csv files of sales data and storing the results in an Amazon S3 bucket once every hour. An AWS duo ETL process can use services such as AWS Glue or AWS Data Pipeline to extract data from S3, transform it into a more efficient format such as Apache Parquet, and load it back into S3. Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format that can improve the query performance and reliability of Athena by reducing the amount of data scanned, improving compression ratio, and enabling predicate pushdown.