A system prompt, also called a system message, is used to guide how a generative AI model behaves, including its tone, role, response style, and output format. Microsoft states that system messages help steer an Azure OpenAI chat model toward the desired behavior, tone, and output format.

Statement 1: System prompts can be used to authorize users. = No

Authorization is handled by application identity, access control, authentication, and security configuration. A system prompt can guide model behavior, but it is not an authorization mechanism.

Statement 2: A system prompt is used to reduce tokens per minute (TPM). = No

TPM is a quota or throughput setting for model deployments. A system prompt does not reduce or configure TPM.

Statement 3: A system prompt guides the behavior of a generative AI model. = Yes

This is correct. Microsoft documentation says system messages help steer the model’s behavior, tone, and output format.

Azure Content Understanding analysis operations are long-running operations in the Python SDK. Microsoft’s Python SDK documentation states that analysis operations return a poller, and the SDK provides LROPoller types that handle polling automatically when you call .result() .

Therefore, the correct workflow is to submit the PDF by calling begin_analyze() , receive a poller, and then call:

result = poller.result()

Option B is incorrect because extraction results are not read from request headers.

Option C is incorrect because the requirement is to use Azure Content Understanding extraction, not build a manual OCR-only mapping pipeline.

Option D is incorrect because the SDK analysis pattern is asynchronous/long-running, not a simple synchronous analyze() call that returns all extracted fields in the same request.

client = OpenAI(

api_key="...",

base_url="https://resource1.openai.azure.com/openai/v1/",

)

response = client.responses.create(

model="my-mini-gpt",

)

For Azure OpenAI in Microsoft Foundry, the base_url uses the Azure OpenAI resource name in the endpoint format:

https:// < resource-name > .openai.azure.com/openai/v1/

In the question, the Azure OpenAI resource is named Resource1 , so the first blank must be resource1 . Microsoft documentation for Azure OpenAI v1 endpoints confirms that the endpoint must use the ...openai.azure.com/openai/v1/ path.

For the model parameter, Azure OpenAI requires the deployment name , not the underlying model name. Microsoft states that Azure OpenAI always requires the deployment name when calling APIs, even when the parameter is named model.

The deployed model is gpt-4.1-mini , but the deployment name is my-mini-gpt . Therefore, the second blank must be:

model="my-mini-gpt"

So the correct selections are:

base_url blank = resource1

model blank = my-mini-gpt

To create an AI agent that follows a specific role and behavior, you configure system instructions . Microsoft Foundry Agent Service documentation states that agent instructions define goals, constraints, and behavior .

Option A. tokens per minute (TPM) controls throughput quota, not behavior.

Option C. temperature controls response randomness/creativity, not the agent’s role.

Option D. max completion tokens controls response length, not the agent’s role or behavioral rules.

Therefore, the correct answer is B. system instructions .

Statement 1: Evaluators in Microsoft Foundry replace the need for configuring token limits. = No

Evaluators are used to assess model or agent output quality, safety, and reliability. They do not replace model configuration settings such as token limits. Microsoft describes evaluators as tools that measure the quality, safety, and reliability of AI responses.

Statement 2: Evaluators in Microsoft Foundry can assess the quality and safety of responses generated by a generative AI model. = Yes

This is correct. Microsoft Foundry includes built-in evaluators for general quality metrics such as coherence and fluency, safety/security metrics, RAG metrics, and agent-specific metrics.

Statement 3: Evaluators in Microsoft Foundry can retrain a deployed generative AI model automatically when quality issues are detected. = No

Evaluators measure and report quality, safety, and reliability issues. They do not automatically retrain deployed generative AI models. Microsoft describes evaluation as measuring model or agent performance against test data, while monitoring can alert when outputs fail quality thresholds.