Explanation

ISO 18602:2013 is about Packaging and the environment — Optimization of the packaging system. ISO 18602:2013 specifies requirements and a procedure for assessment of packaging to ensure that the weight or volume of its material content is optimized consistent with the functions of packaging. This is one of several options for reducing the impact of packaging on the environment.

It also provides methodologies and procedures for

- determining the amount and minimization of substances or mixtures hazardous to the environ-ment, and

- determining the amount of four heavy metals (lead, cadmium, mercury, hexavalent chromium) in packaging.

The optimum balance in this standard weighs the environmental impact of losses that may happen with no packaging or inadequate packaging against the environmental impact from excess packag-ing.

The process for packaging design, including material selection, is not part of ISO 18602:2013.

The procedure for applying ISO 18602:2013 is contained in ISO 18601.

Socially responsible disposal practices prioritize:

Public safety : Protecting individuals and communities from any adverse effects related to waste disposal.

Environmental responsibility : Minimizing ecological damage through responsible disposal methods.

These practices are fundamental to whole-life asset management, which emphasizes sustainability and ethical considerations throughout the lifecycle of assets.

Low stock levels can lead to:

Delays and higher fulfillment costs : When stock is insufficient, emergency orders and expedited shipping may be necessary, increasing costs.

Stockouts during high demand : Insufficient inventory can lead to missed sales opportunities, negatively impacting customer satisfaction.

Whole-life asset management seeks to balance inventory levels to avoid stockouts while minimizing holding costs.

Explanation

Costs of holding inventory include the following:

• Acquisition cost

• Inventory holding cost

• Costs of stock-outs

Acquisition costs follow the typical procure-to-pay model. Benefits of procure-to-Pay (P2P) software include:

- Vendor Management, which includes researching, selecting, engaging with, and evaluating the performance of suppliers who make up your supply chain.

- Purchase Requisition Workflows, or the formal process of creating and submitting a purchase requisition (PR) for approval to meet a specific business need.

- Purchase Order (PO) Workflows, covering the creation of a formal, detailed PO from the purchase requisition, including information on the quantity and quality of goods and services, as well as specific terms and conditions.

- Receiving, which includes the acceptance of physical goods (or review of quality and completion for services) and entering the accepted order into inventory, tracking, and accounting systems.

- Invoice Management, during which the invoice is compared to the original PO to verify pricing, quality, quantity, and terms have been met.

- Accounts Payable Workflows, wherein the accounts payable department processes the invoice for payment, submits the payment to the vendor, and reconciles any related financial entries in the accounting system.

The software is intended to help reduce the acquisition costs.

LO 2, AC 2.2

Hiring is often preferred when:

Frequency of use is low : If equipment is only needed occasionally, hiring is more economical.

Storage is unavailable : Leased equipment needs storage, which incurs additional costs.

Lease costs exceed hiring costs for limited use .

Whole-life asset management emphasizes cost-efficient solutions, and hiring equipment for limited use reduces unnecessary expenses compared to leasing or purchasing.

Explanation

A cost-benefit analysis is a process businesses use to analyze decisions (such as capital investment). The business or analyst sums the benefits of a situation or action and then subtracts the costs associated with taking that action.

A cost-benefit analysis (CBA) should begin with compiling a comprehensive list of all the costs and benefits associated with the project or decision.

The costs involved in a CBA might include the following:

- Direct costs would be direct labor involved in manufacturing, inventory, raw materials, manufacturing expenses.

- Indirect costs might include electricity, overhead costs from management, rent, utilities.

- Intangible costs of a decision, such as the impact on customers, employees, or delivery times.

- Opportunity costs such as alternative investments, or buying a plant versus building one.

- Cost of potential risks such as regulatory risks, competition, and environmental impacts.

Benefits might include the following:

- Revenue and sales increases from increased production or new product.

- Intangible benefits, such as improved employee safety and morale, as well as customer satisfaction due to enhanced product offerings or faster delivery.

- Competitive advantage or market share gained as a result of the decision.

An analyst or project manager should apply a monetary measurement to all of the items on the cost-benefit list, taking special care not to underestimate costs or overestimate benefits. A conservative approach with a conscious effort to avoid any subjective tendencies when calculating estimates is best suited when assigning a value to both costs and benefits for a cost-benefit analysis.

Finally, the results of the aggregate costs and benefits should be compared quantitatively to deter-mine if the benefits outweigh the costs. If so, then the rational decision is to go forward with the project. If not, the business should review the project to see if it can make adjustments to either increase benefits or decrease costs to make the project viable. Otherwise, the company should likely avoid the project.

Explanation

A ' U ' flow occurs when the goods receipt and dispatch functions are located at the same end of a warehouse building.

Products flow in at receiving, move in to storage in the back of the warehouse, and then to shipping, which is located at the adjacent to receiving on the same side of the building.

Items with higher throughput level are located closer to the loading bays. An example of a ' U ' flow design can be seen in the diagram below.

Advantages of ' U ' Flow

- Excellent utilization of dock resources because the receiving and shipping processes can share dock doors

- Facilitating cross-docking because the receiving and shipping docks are adjacent to one another and may be co-mingled

- Excellent lift truck utilization because put away and retrieval trips are easily combined and be-cause the storage locations closest to the receiving and shipping docks are natural locations to house fast moving items

- Yields excellent security because there is a single side of the building used for entry and exit