In order to create a custom URL category to apply a secure Web gateway policy combining your own list of URLs and Netskope predefined categories, you must add the URL list to a Custom category. This is because Netskope allows you to create custom categories that can be used in policies to block or allow access to specific URLs. You can also include or exclude predefined categories and other URL lists in your custom category. To create a custom category, you need to go to Policies > Web > Custom Categories and click New Custom Category. Then you can select the predefined categories and URL lists that you want to include or exclude in your custom category. You also need to give your custom category a name and save it. After creating a custom category, you can apply it to a Real-time Protection policy by selecting it from the Categories dropdown. The other options are not valid tasks for creating a custom URL category. You do not need to add the URL list to the Client configuration, as this is only required for client-side steering methods. You do not need to add the URL list to a Steering configuration, as this is only required for network-side steering methods. You do not need to add the URL list to a Real-time Protection policy directly, as this will not allow you to combine it with predefined categories. References: Custom Category3, Create Custom Categories

To continuously detect and enforce compliance standards for their Microsoft 365 and Azure applications, the customer needs to use Netskope SaaS Security Posture Management (SSPM) and Netskope Continuous Security Assessment (CSA). Netskope SSPM allows the customer to monitor, assess, and act on security, permission, and access related issues in their SaaS environment, such as Microsoft 365. Netskope SSPM continuously checks security posture by comparing SaaS app settings with security policies and industry benchmarks (CIS, PCI-DSS, NIST, HIPAA, CSA, GDPR, AIPCA, ISO, and more). It also provides visibility and control over third-party apps that are connected to the managed apps1. Netskope CSA allows the customer to discover, audit, and remediate misconfigurations in their IaaS environment, such as Azure. Netskope CSA continuously monitors and audits cloud configurations against industry standards, CIS benchmarks, and regulatory frameworks. It also provides real-time inline protection to secure public clouds from threats and data loss2. Therefore, options A and D are correct and the other options are incorrect. References: SaaS Security Posture Management - Netskope, Public Cloud Security Solutions - Netskope

To create a report to view the top five categories of unsanctioned applications accessed in the last 90 days, the security analyst would need to use two data collections in Advanced Analytics: Application Events and Network Events. Application Events provide information about the cloud applications and websites accessed by users, such as app name, app category, app risk score, app instance, app version, and more. Network Events provide information about the network traffic generated by users, such as source IP, destination IP, protocol, port, bytes sent, bytes received, and more. By combining these two data collections, the security analyst can filter the events by app category, app risk score, and time range to create a report that shows the top five categories of unsanctioned applications accessed in the last 90 days. Alerts and Page Events are not relevant for this report. Alerts provide information about the alerts triggered by Real-time Protection or API Data Protection policies, such as alert type, alert severity, alert status, alert description, and more. Page Events provide information about the web pages visited by users, such as page title, page URL, page category, page risk score, page content type, and more. References: Advanced Analytics

The correct practice is to place high-priority rules, such as those with specific scanning actions, at the top of the Real-time Protection policy rule list. Placing the rule at the top ensures it is applied before other less restrictive rules, like those configured only for browsing activities​​.

Netskope’s GRE tunneling supports only web traffic, which means ICMP traffic (ping) is not supported for hosts behind the Netskope gateway. You may, however, ping the probe IP provided by Netskope to test connectivity, as this IP is designated for diagnostics​​.

The problem in this scenario is that the traffic matched a Do Not Decrypt policy. A Do Not Decrypt policy is a rule that specifies the traffic that you want to leave encrypted and not further analyzed by Netskope via the Real-time Protection policies1. In the exhibit, we can see that the traffic from the user to YouTube has a “Bypass Traffic” value of “yes” and a “Netskope” value of “yes”. This means that the traffic was steered to Netskope but not decrypted or inspected2. Therefore, the real-time policy that was created to restrict users from accessing YouTube content tagged as Sport did not apply, and users could still access the content. To solve this problem, you need to either remove or modify the Do Not Decrypt policy that matches the traffic to YouTube, or create an exception for the Sport category in the policy3. Therefore, option D is correct and the other options are incorrect. References: Page Events - Netskope Knowledge Portal, Add a Policy for SSL Decryption - Netskope Knowledge Portal, YouTube Content Control - Netskope Knowledge Portal

The "200" response code confirms that the request was processed successfully. The request URL indicates that it was set to retrieve application event data with a limit of 5000 records. Additionally, the response includes categories such as "Professional Networking and Social," verifying that these were part of the requested data​​.