The definition of done (DoD) is a set of criteria that a product increment must meet for the team to consider it complete and ready for customers 1 . It ensures the quality and consistency of a deliverable.  The DoD is agreed upon by the entire project team, including developers, testers, product owners, and other stakeholders 2 .  One of the common criteria that is typically included in the DoD for the team increment is regression testing, which is the process of verifying that the existing functionality of the system is not affected by the new changes 3 .  Regression testing is done to ensure that the product increment meets the quality standards and does not introduce any defects or errors 4 .  References :  What is the Definition of Done? Understanding DOD in Agile - Atlassian ,  What is the definition of done? Guide for agile teams with examples - LogRocket Blog ,  What is Regression Testing? Definition, Tools, Method, and Example ,  What is typically included in the Definition of Done for the - Madanswer

The role of the Scrum Master in SAFe is to act as a servant leader who helps teams self-organize, self-manage, and deliver using effective Agile practices. The Scrum Master educates the team on various frameworks and methods, including Scrum, Kanban, Extreme Programming, and SAFe, ensuring that the agreed-upon Agile process is followed. The Scrum Master also helps remove impediments, facilitates team and program events, coaches the team and stakeholders on how to apply the SAFe principles and values, and fosters an environment of continuous improvement and high performance.  References :  Scrum Master - Scaled Agile Framework ,  SAFe Scrum Master Roles and Responsibilities - KnowledgeHut

  The balanced Agile testing pyramid is a testing strategy that illustrates the distribution of different types of tests in a test suite. It suggests that we should have many unit tests, which are small, low-level, and automated tests that verify the functionality of individual components of the codebase. We should also have many service or integration tests, which are automated tests that verify the interaction and integration of different components or services. Finally, we should have fewer large, manual tests, such as graphical user interface tests or end-to-end tests, which verify the functionality and usability of the whole system from the user’s perspective. The balanced Agile testing pyramid helps agile teams to achieve faster feedback, higher quality, and lower maintenance costs.  References :  The Practical Test Pyramid ,  What is Testing Pyramid? How Does It Benefit Agile Teams? ,  Climbing the Testing Pyramid ,  Agile Test Pyramid ,  Agile Test Automation Pyramid

During the PI Planning event, planning adjustments are agreed upon during the management review and problem-solving meeting, which is the last activity of the first day of the event 1 .  In this meeting, the management team reviews the draft plans of the teams, identifies and resolves any issues, risks, or dependencies, and makes any necessary changes to the scope, people, or resources 1 .  The management team also communicates the planning adjustments back to the Agile Release Train (ART) the next day, before the teams continue their planning and make the appropriate adjustments 2 .  References :  PI Planning ,  Management Review and Problem-Solving

 A user story is a short description of a small piece of desired functionality written from the user’s perspective and in their language. A user story has three primary components, each of which begin with the letter ‘C’: Card, Conversation, and Confirmation. The card is a written or digital note that captures the essence of the user story using the format: “As a (who), I want (what), so that (why).” The conversation is the ongoing dialogue between the team and the customer or product owner to elaborate and refine the user story details.  The confirmation is the set of acceptance criteria and tests that verify the user story is done and meets the customer’s expectations 1 2 .  References :  What is User Story? - Visual Paradigm ,  The Anatomy of a User Story | Scrum Alliance | Includes Template

Systems thinking is a holistic approach to solution development, incorporating all aspects of a system and its environment into the design, development, deployment, and maintenance. It requires leaders and teams to understand the solution, the enterprise, and the value stream as a system. One of the principles of systems thinking is that optimizing a component of the system does not optimize the whole system. In fact, it may even harm the system performance, as it may create bottlenecks, conflicts, or waste in other parts of the system. Therefore, systems thinking encourages looking at the system as a whole and finding the best trade-offs and synergies among the components.  References :  Principle #2 - Apply systems thinking - Scaled Agile Framework ,  What ‘systems thinking’ actually means - and why it matters today | World Economic Forum ,  What is Systems Thinking? - Critical Thinking Secrets

 The Product/Solution Vision presentation is the PI Planning activity where Product Management introduces the prioritized Features to the teams for planning. This presentation provides the teams with a clear and compelling vision of the expected outcomes and benefits of the upcoming PI. It also includes the top Features and Capabilities that are needed to realize the vision, along with their priorities and dependencies. The teams use this information to plan their Iteration goals and PI objectives, as well as to identify risks and issues that may affect their delivery.  References : =  PI Planning - Scaled Agile Framework ,  Exam Study Guide: SP (6.0) - SAFe® Practitioner

Learn more

1 blob:https://www.bing.com/de17474a-36f7-4492-bee8-fda596ce6ca4

scaledagileframework.com 2 blob:https://www.bing.com/7ae70a2b-bc92-4a78-8062-40fdaf79bd54

support.scaledagile.com 3 blob:https://www.bing.com/7ae70a2b-bc92-4a78-8062-40fdaf79bd54

support.scaledagile.com 4 blob:https://www.bing.com/7885211d-18bd-4607-a6ae-2c64adb8f1b1

iconagility.com 5 blob:https://www.bing.com/f9138387-3093-43f1-9be4-d1ae13e5980f

scaledagile

Acceptance criteria are the conditions that a story must satisfy to be accepted by the Product Owner and the stakeholders. They define the boundaries of the story and provide guidance on how to test it for completion. Acceptance criteria are usually written as a list of statements or scenarios that describe the expected behavior and outcomes of the story.  They help to ensure that the story delivers value to the user and meets the Definition of Done 1 2 3 4 .  References :  Story - Scaled Agile Framework ,  How to Write Agile Test Case Requirements | SmartBear ,  Agile Story Completion Checklist - SDLCforms ,  Module 2: Complete a story - IBM

A program event is an event that involves all the teams in an Agile Release Train (ART) and occurs at the program level.  According to the SAFe for Teams SP (6.0) handbook, there are three program events: PI Planning, System Demo, and Inspect and Adapt 1 .  Innovation and Planning (IP) is also a program event, as it is a special iteration that occurs at the end of each Program Increment (PI) and provides time for the ART to innovate, plan, and improve 2 . Therefore, Innovation and Planning is an example of a program event. The other options are not program events, but team events, as they occur at the team level and involve only one agile team.  Scrum of scrums, Iteration review, and Daily stand-up are team events that are part of the iteration execution cycle 3 .  References :  SAFe for Teams SP (6.0) - SAFe Practitioner handbook ,  Innovation and Planning Iteration - Scaled Agile Framework ,  Iteration Execution - Scaled Agile Framework

The Iteration Review is a cadence-based event, where each team inspects the increment at the end of every Iteration to assess progress, and then adjusts its backlog for the next iteration.  During the Iteration review, each Agile Team measures and then demonstrates its progress by showing working stories to the Product Owner and other stakeholders to get their feedback 1 . The Iteration Review provides two views into the program: how the team is doing on the Program Increment and how the team did on the Iteration.  The first view shows how the team is progressing toward its Team Program Increment (PI) Objectives, which are the measurable outcomes that the team intends to achieve in a PI 2 .  The second view shows how the team performed in the current Iteration, based on the Iteration Goals and the completed stories 1 . The other options are not views that the Iteration Review provides into the program, but rather aspects of the team culture or behavior that may be influenced by other events or practices in SAFe.  References :  Iteration Review - Scaled Agile Framework ,  Team PI Objectives - Scaled Agile Framework