This scenario requires a specific combination of Snowflake's extensibility features: the ability to run Python (pandas) code, the ability to return multiple rows for a single input (tabular output), and high performance through vectorization.

A User-Defined Table Function (UDTF) is the correct architectural choice when an input value needs to be expanded into a set of rows. While a standard UDF returns exactly one value per input row, a UDTF can return zero, one, or many rows, making it ideal for "parsing" or "splitting" tasks. By using a Vectorized UDTF (specifically utilizing the Python handler with pandas), the Analyst can process blocks of rows as pandas DataFrames or Series. This is significantly more efficient than processing one row at a time because it reduces the overhead of the Snowflake-to-Python execution engine.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A is incorrect because a standard UDF can only return a single scalar value per input row, making it impossible to "return multiple rows of parsed output."

Option C is incorrect because External Functions are used to call code hosted outside of Snowflake (like an AWS Lambda). While they can process data, they introduce network latency and are not the native way to run pandas code for internal joins.

Option D is incorrect because Stored Procedures are generally used for administrative tasks and procedural logic. While they can return tables, they cannot be directly "joined" with other tables in a standard SELECT statement in the same way a UDTF can.

Option B is the correct choice. It satisfies the requirement for pandas integration, provides the necessary multi-row output via the process and end_partition methods, and allows the analyst to use the LATERAL keyword to join the parsed results directly with existing tables in a single SQL statement.

In Data Analysis, correlation refers to a statistical relationship between two variables. When analyzing a time-series chart like the one provided, a Data Analyst looks for patterns in how the two categories—"Enterprise" (blue line) and "Pro Edition" (yellow line)—move in relation to one another over the X-axis (Year).

A Positive Correlation would be indicated if both lines generally moved in the same direction at the same time (e.g., when Enterprise sales increase, Pro Edition sales also increase). A Negative Correlation (or inverse correlation) would be shown if the lines moved in opposite directions consistently (e.g., when one peaks, the other troughs).

Looking closely at the provided exhibit, the fluctuations for both editions are highly erratic and appear independent of each other. For instance, around the year 2008, the Pro Edition (yellow) shows a significant peak while the Enterprise edition (blue) experiences a sharp decline. Conversely, in other sections of the chart, they both dip or rise simultaneously by chance, but there is no sustained, predictable pattern of movement. The peaks and valleys do not align in a way that suggests one variable's movement is tied to the other.

Statistically, this lack of a discernible relationship indicates a Correlation Coefficient near zero. In the context of the Snowflake Snowpro Advanced: Data Analyst exam, identifying "No Correlation" is a key skill for interpreting Snowsight visualizations. It tells the analyst that the factors driving sales for the Enterprise tier are likely distinct from those driving the Pro Edition, and they should be analyzed as independent segments rather than interdependent variables. Therefore, based on the visual evidence of random, non-synchronous movement across the timeline, the only supported conclusion is that there is no correlation.

Snowsight, the modern web interface for Snowflake, introduces robust collaboration features through shared worksheets. Understanding the synchronization and versioning logic is critical for the Data Presentation and Data Visualization domain.

When a worksheet is shared with collaborators, Snowflake enables real-time collaboration (Option D). This means that as one user types or modifies SQL code, those changes are immediately visible to all other users who have the worksheet open. This functionality is similar to co-authoring in modern document editors, allowing data teams to debug or develop complex queries synchronously without the need for manual copy-pasting or constant screen sharing.

Furthermore, Snowflake manages the execution history of shared worksheets through a structured versioning system (Option C). If multiple users are interacting with the same worksheet, Snowflake does not overwrite a single "master" state during execution. Instead, every time a user executes the worksheet (or a portion of it), Snowflake creates a new version of the worksheet content associated with that specific run. This ensures that the code used to generate a particular result set is preserved and tied to that specific Query ID in the history.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A is incorrect because while users can see current edits, viewing a full, navigable history of "past versions" is not a standard feature in the same way it is in dedicated version control systems like Git.

Option B is incorrect as worksheet sharing is restricted to users within the same Snowflake account. Sharing across accounts requires the use of Data Shares or Private Listings.

Option E is incorrect because Snowflake preserves the history rather than overwriting it, allowing analysts to audit who ran what code and when.

Options C and D are the 100% correct answers. They define the synchronous and persistent nature of Snowsight collaboration, ensuring that teams can work together effectively while maintaining an immutable trail of executions.

The INFER_SCHEMA function is a powerful tool in the Snowflake ingestion toolkit, specifically designed to bridge the gap between semi-structured data and relational tables. In modern data engineering, files like Parquet, Avro, and ORC are "self-describing," meaning they contain their own schema definitions (field names and data types) within the file header.

Before INFER_SCHEMA existed, a Data Analyst had to manually inspect a Parquet file, identify the keys, determine their data types, and then manually write a CREATE TABLE statement with the matching columns. INFER_SCHEMA automates this by scanning a set of files in a stage and returning a result set that describes the detected schema. This allows for the dynamic creation of tables that perfectly match the incoming data files.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A is incorrect because "unstructured data" (like PDFs or Images) does not have a schema that can be "inferred" in a relational sense.

Option C is incorrect because INFER_SCHEMA operates on files in a Stage, not on data already sitting in a table cell. To parse JSON in a table, you would use functions like FLATTEN or simple path notation.

Option D is incorrect because the DESCRIBE TABLE or GET_DDL commands are used to retrieve definitions for existing tables.

Option B is the Correct answer. It specifically identifies the role of the function: detecting metadata (schema) from staged semi-structured files. This function is often used in conjunction with GENERATE_COLUMN_DESCRIPTION and CREATE TABLE ... USING TEMPLATE to fully automate the schema evolution and ingestion process.

To determine the output of the final statement, a Data Analyst must perform a step-by-step trace of the code execution, following standard order of operations (inner-to-outer) and procedural logic within the Snowflake Scripting environment.

Step 1: Evaluating the innermost function, func2(10)

The definition for func2 takes a number p and returns p + 10.

Input: 10

Calculation: $10 + 10 = 20$

Result: 20

Step 2: Evaluating the next function, func1(20)

The definition for func1 takes a number v and returns v + 10.

Input: 20 (the result from Step 1)

Calculation: $20 + 10 = 30$

Result: 30

Step 3: Evaluating the procedure call, proc1(30)

The procedure proc1 takes an input variable named result. It then executes a conditional IF statement:

Conditional Check: IF (result >= 30)

Since the input is 30, the condition evaluates to True.

Action: The procedure executes RETURN result - 10.

Calculation: $30 - 10 = 20$

Summary of Logic:

The nested calls flow as follows: call proc1(30) $\rightarrow$ proc1 evaluates $30 \ge 30$ $\rightarrow$ proc1 returns $30 - 10$, which is 20. If the initial input had been lower, such that the final result passed to the procedure was less than 30, it would have followed the ELSE branch and returned the original value. This question evaluates the analyst's ability to interpret modular code and procedural control flow, which are key components of the Data Transformation and Data Modeling domain in the SnowPro Advanced: Data Analyst exam.

In the Snowflake ecosystem, Parquet is treated as a semi-structured data format. When you stage a Parquet file, Snowflake does not automatically parse it into multiple columns like it might with a flat CSV file. Instead, the entire content of a single row or record is loaded into a single VARIANT column, which is referenced in SQL using the positional notation $1.

The fundamental mistake often made—and represented in Option A—is treating Parquet as a delimited format where $1, $2, and $3 refer to different columns. In Parquet ingestion, columns $2 and beyond will return NULL because the schema is contained within the object in $1.

To successfully "shred" or flatten this semi-structured data into a relational table with separate columns, an analyst must use path notation. This involves referencing the root object ($1), followed by a colon (:), and then the specific element key (e.g., $1:o_custkey). Furthermore, because the values extracted from a Variant are technically still Variants, they must be explicitly cast to the correct data type using the double-colon syntax (e.g., ::number, ::date) to ensure they land in the target table with the correct data types.

Evaluating the Options:

Option A is incorrect because it uses positional references ($2, $3, etc.) which are only valid for structured files like CSVs.

Option B is incorrect because it attempts to reference keys directly without the required stage variable ($1) and colon separator.

Option D is incorrect as it uses a non-standard parse() function that does not exist for this purpose in Snowflake SQL.

Option C is the 100% correct syntax. It correctly identifies that the Parquet data resides in $1, utilizes the colon to access internal keys, and applies the necessary type casting. This specific method is known as "Transformation During Ingestion" and is a core competency for any SnowPro Advanced Data Analyst.

In Snowsight, worksheets and dashboards are tightly integrated to facilitate a smooth transition from data exploration to formal reporting. When a Data Analyst has already done the "heavy lifting"—cleaning and preparing data within standalone worksheets—Snowflake provides a direct way to convert those worksheets into dashboard tiles.

The "least operational overhead" method is to Move the existing worksheets into the dashboard. When you are in the dashboard view, you can select the option to add a tile and then choose an existing worksheet from your folders. This "Move" or "Add from Worksheet" action preserves the entire SQL statement, any formatting applied to the results, and the visualization settings (charts) that were already configured in the worksheet.

Evaluating the Options:

Option B and C are technically possible but require significantly more effort (manual copy-pasting, switching windows, re-naming tiles). This increases the risk of human error and is not considered a high-efficiency workflow in Snowsight.

Option D is the most complex and overhead-intensive option, requiring the analyst to sift through system logs to recover code they already have access to in their UI.

Option A is the 100% correct answer. By moving or importing the worksheet directly into the dashboard as a tile, the analyst maintains the link between the development work and the final presentation with just a few clicks. Note that once a worksheet is moved into a dashboard, it essentially becomes a "tile" and is managed as part of the dashboard object.