The correct answer is A .

The debug flow shows:

traffic is going to TCP port 211

FortiGate logs run helper-ftp(dir=original)

The study guide explains exactly what that message means:

“In this example, the run helper-ftp message indicates that the FTP session helper is being used.”

Under normal proxy-based inspection, protocol handling is controlled by Protocol Options . The FortiOS administration guide states:

“Protocol port mapping only works with proxy-based inspection.” and “The ports can be modified to inspect any port with flowing traffic.”

So if the policy is configured for proxy-based inspection but the debug still shows the FTP session helper on port 211, the most likely explanation is that the FTP protocol mapping in Protocol Options is broad enough to match unexpectedly, such as being mapped to Any . That would cause FortiGate to identify the traffic as FTP and invoke the helper.

Why the other options are wrong:

B is wrong because SSL deep inspection is unrelated to this debug. The traffic shown is plain TCP/211 , and the key message is about the FTP helper , not SSL decryption.

C is wrong because if FTP had not been mapped to port 211, FortiGate would be less likely to treat this traffic as FTP. The observed run helper-ftp indicates FTP handling is being triggered.

D is wrong because low-memory conserve behavior would typically cause inspection bypass or blocking behavior, not specifically the run helper-ftp message. The study guide’s helper example ties this message to session-helper use, not memory shortage.

So the verified answer is: A .

The study guide states:

“The kernel memory slabs are collections of objects with a common purpose. The kernel uses them to store information in memory.”

It also gives the exact calculation rule:

“Total slab size = available objects x object size”

From the exhibit:

tcp_session 3 5 1500 ...

So:

available objects = 5

object size = 1500

Therefore:

Total slab size = 5 × 1500 = 7500 kB

That makes D correct, and it is associated with the kernel , not user space.

Why the other options are wrong:

A is wrong because sctp_session 0 0 1600 ... gives 0 × 1600 = 0 , but slabs are associated with the kernel , not user space.

B is wrong because ip_session 1 3 1200 ... gives 3 × 1200 = 3600 , but again slabs are kernel memory, not user space.

C is wrong because ip6_session 0 0 1300 ... gives 0 × 1300 = 0 , not 1300.

To determine why sessions are being removed, we must interpret the specific counters in the diagnose sys session stat output provided in the exhibit.

Analyze memory_tension_drop (Reason A):

Observation: The output shows memory_tension_drop=4.

This counter specifically increments when the FortiGate kernel attempts to allocate a new memory page for a session but fails due to a lack of available system memory. As a result, the session creation is aborted or an existing session is dropped to free up resources. This confirms that the kernel is struggling to allocate memory pages.

Analyze extreme_low_mem (Reason D):

Observation: The output shows extreme_low_mem=0 (which is good), but we must look at the context of memory_tension_drop.

Context: While the extreme_low_mem counter itself is 0 in this snapshot, the presence of memory_tension_drop indicates the system is under memory pressure. Furthermore, in many Fortinet exam contexts involving this specific exhibit, the focus is on the mechanism of " flushing sessions " to recover memory.

Refinement: Actually, look closer at the exhibit. It shows flush=787.

The flush counter indicates the number of times the system has actively purged (flushed) old or stale sessions from the table to recover memory or due to policy changes. A high flush count combined with memory tension drops strongly suggests the system is aggressively removing sessions to handle high memory usage. Therefore, " FortiGate is flushing sessions because of high memory usage " is the correct interpretation of the flush and memory_tension_drop counters working together.

Why other options are incorrect:

B: There is no counter in this specific output (like tcp_syn_sent drop) that indicates dropping incomplete handshakes. The clash=0 and delete=0 counters are low/zero.

C: The dev_down=16/120 field does not mean the device was down for 10 seconds. It refers to device index pointers or internal kernel interface states, not system uptime/downtime impacting session acceptance in the way described.

The issue is caused by the strict matching logic of the configured Prefix List.

Current State: The rule is edit 1 with set prefix 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 and both ge (greater than or equal) and le (less than or equal) are unset.

Behavior: When ge and le are unset, FortiOS requires an exact match of the subnet mask. The current rule only matches the exact network 172.16.0.0/16. It denies 172.16.52.0/24 because the mask (/24) does not match the rule ' s mask (/16).

To fix this and inject 172.16.52.0/24, you must modify the list to match the /24 mask:

A. Add another entry to the prefix list to specifically allow the 172.16.52.0/24 network:

Creating a new rule (e.g., edit 2) with set prefix 172.16.52.0 255.255.255.0 will provide an exact match for the incoming route, allowing it to pass the distribute-list.

B. Change the ge value to 17:

By configuring set ge 17 on the existing rule (conceptually 172.16.0.0/16 ge 17), you change the logic from " exact match " to " range match " .

This configuration tells the router to match any prefix starting with 172.16.x.x that has a subnet mask length of 17 or greater.

Since the incoming route is a /24, and 24 is greater than 17, the route will match the prefix list and be accepted.

Why other options are incorrect:

C: The option text appears to read " Change the ... value to 16 " . If this refers to le 16, it would enforce the mask to be exactly /16 or less, which still excludes /24.

D: Changing the default behavior to implicit allow defeats the purpose of a filter (security control) and is not a standard configuration step for fixing a single missing route.

The correct answers are A and B .

The Network Security Support Engineer 7.6 Study Guide states under OSPF Troubleshooting :

“Follow these steps to troubleshoot an OSPF problem between two peers:

Check that the local router can reach the remote peer. IP addresses must be in the same subnet and have the same subnet mask.

Ensure that IP protocol 89 is not blocked.

Hello and dead intervals must match.

The OSPF router ID for each peer must be unique. Duplicate router IDs are not allowed.

Do the MTUs match?

If authentication is enabled, the type and password must match on both sides.”**

The same page also summarizes the troubleshooting tips as:

“Do peers have an IP address within the same subnet?”

“Is IP protocol 89 blocked?”

This directly confirms:

A is correct

B is correct

Why the other options are wrong:

C is wrong because TCP port 179 is used by BGP , not OSPF. OSPF uses IP protocol 89 , as the study guide explicitly notes

D is wrong because the study guide’s OSPF adjacency troubleshooting checklist does not require an active static route to the peer. OSPF neighbors form adjacency on directly reachable networks, and the guide instead focuses on same subnet, protocol 89, intervals, router ID, MTU, and authentication matching

So the verified answers are: A, B .