Summer Sale Special 65% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: ex2p65

Exact2Pass Menu

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam

Last Update 3 days ago Total Questions : 198

The ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam content is now fully updated, with all current exam questions added 3 days ago. Deciding to include ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice exam questions in your study plan goes far beyond basic test preparation.

You'll find that our ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam questions frequently feature detailed scenarios and practical problem-solving exercises that directly mirror industry challenges. Engaging with these ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor sample sets allows you to effectively manage your time and pace yourself, giving you the ability to finish any ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam practice test comfortably within the allotted time.

Question # 4

Based on the last paragraph of scenario 3, which audit principle did Augustine violate? Refer to scenario 3.

Scenario 3: Heala specializes in developing Al-driven solutions for the healthcare sector. With a keen focus on leveraging Al to revolutionize patient care, diagnostics,

and treatment planning, the company has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001. After a year of having the AIMS in

place, the company decided to apply for a certification audit.

It contracted a local certification body, who established the audit team and assigned the audit team leader. Augustine, the designated audit team leader, has a wide

range of skills relevant to various auditing domains. His proficiency encompasses audit principles, processes, and methods, as well as standards for management

systems and additional references. Furthermore, he is knowledgeable about the Heala’s context and relevant statutory and regulatory requirements.

Augustine first gathered management review records, interested party feedback logs, and revision histories for Heala's AIMS. This crucial step laid the groundwork for

a deeper investigation, which included conducting comprehensive interviews with key personnel to understand how feedback from interested parties directly

influenced updates to the AIMS and its strategic direction. Augustine's thorough evaluation process aimed to verify Heala's commitment to integrating the needs and

expectations of interested parties, a critical requirement of ISO/IEC 42001.

Augustine also integrated a sophisticated Al tool to analyze large datasets for patterns and anomalies, and thus have a more informed and data driven audit process.

This Al solution, known for its ability to sift through vast amounts of data with unparalleled speed and accuracy, enabled Augustine to identify irregularities and trends

that would have been nearly impossible to detect through manual methods. The tool was also helpful in preparing hypotheses based on data.

During the audit. Augustine failed to fully consider Heala’s critical processes, expectations, the complexity of audit tasks, and necessary resources beforehand. This

oversight compromised the audit integrity and reliability, reflecting a significant deviation from the diligence and informed judgment expected of auditors.

A.

Fair presentation

B.

Due professional care

C.

Confidentiality

D.

Integrity

Question # 5

Which of the following statements best describes the evidence collection process carried out by the audit team at Finalogic? Refer to Scenario 4.

Scenario 4: Finalogic leads the application of artificial intelligence in the financial services sector, which is used to improve risk assessment, fraud detection, and

customer service. The company has implemented an artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001 to ensure operational quality, ethical Al

use, regulatory compliance, and transparency, allowing for consistent oversight and structured governance.

This month, Finalogic is undergoing an audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 42001, a critical step in demonstrating its commitment to responsible Al. To

evaluate Finalogic's conformity to the audit criteria, the audit team adopted a comprehensive, evidence-based approach. The gathered evidence ranged from analyses

of unquantifiable information to analyses of samples related to determining the audit criteria-including internal reports generated by Finalogic's own Al system-which

assert successful integration and compliance with the standard.

Additionally, presentations by the company’s Al team during the audit highlighted the system’s success in customer service enhancements and fraud detection,

emphasizing improved efficiency, decision making accuracy, and user trust. An evaluation report prepared by an independent third party firm specializing in Al systems

also provided an objective review of Finalogic's AIMS. It assessed the system's effectiveness, bias, and compliance through a thorough examination.

During the audit, the audit team applied the same level of effort and utilized the same techniques across all audit areas, regardless of their risk level. This strategy

ensured a consistent and thorough evaluation of the AIMS, uncovering any latent weaknesses or inefficiencies that might otherwise go unnoticed.

Despite Finalogic's advanced AIMS and adherence to ISO/IEC 42001 for ethical Al practices, there remains a risk of Al algorithms inadvertently perpetuating bias or

making inaccurate predictions due to unforeseen flaws in training data or algorithmic models. This could lead to unfair loan rejections or approvals, potentially causing

financial losses or damaging the company’s reputation for fairness and accuracy in its financial services. By acknowledging these risks. Finalogic remains committed

to refining its Al governance, implementing bias mitigation strategies, and enhancing transparency to uphold its reputation as a leader in Al driven financial services.

A.

The audit team collected only qualitative evidence

B.

The audit team collected only quantitative evidence

C.

The audit team collected both qualitative and quantitative evidence

D.

The audit team collected only internal performance metrics

Question # 6

Question:

Which of the following responsibilities belongs to the certification body?

A.

Updating the audit plan

B.

Ensuring the establishment of the audit plan

C.

Communicating the audit plan

Question # 7

An auditor is reviewing an AI system used for hiring processes at a tech company and discovers that the system disproportionately rejects candidates from certain ethnic backgrounds. The auditor previously consulted for this company on diversity strategies. Which management system auditing principle (as per ISO 19011) is at risk of being compromised in this scenario?

A.

Confidentiality

B.

Independence

C.

Due Professional Care

D.

Fair Presentation

Question # 8

Which among the following is NOT a core element of AIMS?

A.

Independence and honesty

B.

Fairness and non-discrimination

C.

Privacy and security

D.

Safety and reliability

Question # 9

Which statement regarding the confidentiality of documented information related to or collected from the auditee is NOT accurate?

A.

The certification body notifies the auditee before disclosing information, considering all types of information as confidential unless already public

B.

Confidential information related to the auditee's AIMS can be disclosed without prior notice if legally required or contractually authorized

C.

Information from external sources, like regulators or complaints, is automatically public and can be disclosed without restriction

D.

Auditors and certification bodies must protect the confidentiality of auditee information unless legal or contractual disclosure is required

Question # 10

An AI system is being developed to assist elderly people in their daily activities. The system needs to be intuitive and align with the needs and values of its users. Which core element of AI should guide the design and development of this AI system?

A.

Fairness and Non-Discrimination

B.

Transparency and Explainability

C.

Accountability

D.

Human-Centered Design

Go to page: