You are conducting an ISO 9001 audit of a Materials Recycling Facility (MRF). The organisation processes

waste plastics into raw materials for plastic bottle manufacturers. You reach the manual picking line where operators are removing contaminant materials from incoming products, such as plastic bags, plastic film and badly contaminated items that would compromise the recycling process. You interview the line supervisor.

You: "Why are these plastic items being rejected at this stage?"

Auditee: "They do not meet our processing standards."

You: "What is the reason for that?"

Auditee: "These items are likely to damage the machinery down the line. They can also compromise our

quality standards. We need to protect our reputation for good quality output materials."

You: "What happens to the rejected items?"

Auditee: "Some get melted down in another process later on and some are disposed of as waste products that cannot be recycled."

You: "What happens to the waste products?"

Auditee: "I'm not sure. I suppose they go to landfill."

Which two. of the following actions would you take to investigate further?

You are an auditor from a construction organisation who is conducting a second party audit to ISO 9001 at a steel rolling mill producing

structural steelwork. When auditing the rolling process, you find that the operator who is unloading the furnace does not use the

adjacent infrared pyrometer to measure the appropriate product temperature in readiness for the next production stage.

You: "How do you tell when the billet is ready for the rolling stage?"

Operator: "I've done this job for 20 years. I can tell by the bright red colour."

You: "What happens if the colour is wrong?"

Operator: "The billet goes back into the furnace."

You: "Is the pyrometer ever used?"

Operator: "Only in borderline cases."

You continue to interview the operator and find that around 25% of the billets are sent back to the furnace. This includes 80% of the borderline cases.

Select three options that would provide evidence of conformance with clause 9.1.1 of ISO 9001.

Whistlekleen is a national dry cleaning and laundry company with 50 shops. You are conducting a surveillance audit of the Head Office and are sampling customer complaints. 80% of complaints originate from five shops in the same region. Most of these complaints

relate to customer laundry not being cleaned as customers require. The Quality Manager tells you that these are the oldest shops in the company. The cleaning equipment needs replacing but the company cannot afford it now. You learn that the shop managers were

told to dismiss most of the complaints because of the poor quality of the laundered materials.

On raising the matter with senior management, you are told that there are plans to replace the equipment in these shops over the next five years.

You raised a nonconformity against clause 8.5.1 of ISO 9001.

Based on the scenario, select the three options which best describe the evidence for raising such a nonconformity.

Scenario 7: POLKA is a car manufacturing company based in Stockholm, Sweden. The company has around 14,000 employees working in different sectors which help with the design, painting, assembling, and test drives of the final product. The company is widely known for its qualitative products and affordable prices. In order to retain their reputation, POLKA implemented a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001.

Before applying for certification, the company decided to conduct an internal audit to check whether there are any nonconformities in their QMS and if the requirements of ISO 9001 are being fulfilled. The top management appointed Sean, the internal auditor, as the team leader of the internal audit team. Sean required from the top management to have unrestricted access to the employees and executives of POLKA and to the documented information. Furthermore, Sean required to establish a team with a large number of auditors, considering the size and the complexity of the organization. The top management of POLKA agreed with Sean's requirements.

The top management, in cooperation with Sean, assigned 10 more employees to the audit team. Following that. Sean planned the audit activities and assigned the roles and responsibilities to each auditor. They began by interviewing employees of different manufacturing departments to check whether they are aware of the process of the QMS implementation. While conducting these activities, one of the auditors asked Sean for permission to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis, as he was very familiar with the processes of the department.

Along the way, the teams findings showed that the staff were trained, documented information was updated, and the QMS fulfilled the requirements of ISO 9001. The internal audit took three weeks to complete, and on the last week the audit team held a final meeting

The team shared their results and together drafted the audit report This report was submitted to the top management of the company. The report was maintained as documented information, and was available to the relevant interested parties.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Scenario 7 states that Sean planned audit activities on his own. Is this acceptable?

Who maintains ownership of the audit report?

Scenario 4:

TD Advertising is a print management company based in Chicago. The company offers design services, digital printing, storage, and distribution. As TD expanded, its management recognized that success depended on adopting new technologies and improving quality.

To ensure customer satisfaction and quality improvement, the company decided to pursue ISO 9001 certification.

After implementing the QMS, TD hired a well-known certification body for an audit. Anne Key was appointed as the audit team leader. She received a document listing the audit team members, audit scope, criteria, duration, and audit engagement limits.

Anne reviewed the document and approved the audit mandate. The certification body and TD’s top management signed the certification agreement.

Before contacting TD, Anne reviewed the audit scope and noticed that TD made changes to it due to the adoption of new printing equipment. However, Anne disagreed with the changes, stating they would affect the audit timeline. She considered withdrawing from the audit.

Scenario 4 mentions that Anne received a document that contained the audit scope, criteria, duration, and the limits to the audit engagement. What did Anne receive in this case?

Select the word that best completes the sentence: