Managing solution scope is the task of ensuring that the solution meets the agreed-upon requirements and delivers the expected value to the stakeholders. Managing solution scope involves analyzing the impact of any changes to the scope, assessing the feasibility and risks of the changes, and obtaining approval from the stakeholders before implementing the changes. Managing solution scope can help the business analyst to identify the impacts, dependencies, or risks associated with the addition to the scope. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 83.

Problem tracking is a technique that helps the business analyst to manage and resolve issues identified by stakeholders with requirements. It involves creating a clear and concise record of each issue with its description, impact, priority, data, owner, status, and any other relevant information. It also involves tracking and managing the recorded issues until they are resolved. Problem tracking helps to ensure that issues are not neglected or abandoned, and that they are addressed in a timely and effective manner. Problem tracking also exposes the root causes of issues and helps to prevent recurrence of similar problems in the future. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA) ® Examination Content Outline, page 19.

Decision trees, weighted matrix, and context diagrams are tools and techniques that can help the business analyst to maximize business value while establishing the requirements baseline. Decision trees are graphical representations of possible outcomes and choices based on certain conditions or criteria. Decision trees can help to evaluate and select the best option among multiple alternatives based on their expected value or risk. Weighted matrix are tables that assign scores and weights to different factors or measures to compare and prioritize them. Weighted matrix can help to rank the requirements based on their alignment with the business objectives, benefits, costs, risks, dependencies, urgency, etc. Context diagrams are visual models that show the boundaries and interactions of a system or product with its environment. Context diagrams can help to define the scope and stakeholders of a project, as well as their needs and expectations. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11-12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66-69.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a subject matter expert (SME) is a person who has specialized knowledge or skills in a particular domain or area. A SME can provide valuable insights, information, and guidance to the project team, especially when the project involves a new or unfamiliar market. By hiring external SMEs for the core project team, the business analyst can help to ensure that the project has the necessary expertise and resources to perform the business analysis activities effectively and efficiently. External SMEs can also help to identify and validate the business needs, requirements, and solutions for the new market, and to reduce the risks and uncertainties associated with the project. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: Study.com

The change management plan outlines the process for managing changes to requirements, ensuring that any revisions are controlled and documented throughout the project lifecycle. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

A modeling tool integrated into a version control feature that ensures that team knowledge is captured is a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding. A modeling tool is a tool that allows the business analyst to create visual representations of the product needs, such as diagrams, charts, graphs, or mockups. These models can help the stakeholders to comprehend and verify the requirements more easily than textual descriptions. A version control feature is a tool that allows the business analyst to track and manage changes to the models and ensure that they are consistent and accurate. A version control feature also enables collaboration and knowledge sharing among the team members and stakeholders. A requirements management tool that documents requirements and their properties and relationships is not a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding, as it does not provide visual or graphical representations of the product needs. A document management system and a relationship matrix that groups all related documents is not a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding, as it does not create or display models of the product needs. A workflow management tool that documents the flow of information is not a tool that should be used to improve the communication of product needs with the stakeholders and to improve their understanding, as it only focuses on one aspect of the product needs and does not capture other dimensions such as functionality, quality, or value. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 77-78; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 16.

A functional requirement is a requirement that specifies what the system should do or how it should behave under certain conditions. A functional requirement describes the functionality, behavior, or performance of the system. An example of a functional requirement is the system is able to require passwords, which defines a security feature of the system that prevents unauthorized access. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

 Acceptance criteria are the conditions that must be met for a solution or deliverable to be accepted by the stakeholders. Acceptance criteria should be measurable, testable, and clear, so that the team can verify if the requirements have been met or not. If the acceptance criteria for the requirements were not measurable, the team would have difficulty confirming if certain requirements have been met, as they would not have a clear and objective way to evaluate the solution or deliverable. The other options are not likely to cause this issue. The test engineer is not responsible for communicating requirements to the team, but for testing them against the acceptance criteria. Not all stakeholders need to be involved during requirements elicitation, as long as the key stakeholders who can provide relevant and accurate information are consulted. Requirements should be adequately reviewed with the project sponsor, but this does not affect the confirmation of meeting the requirements, as the sponsor is not the one who verifies them. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39.

User acceptance testing (UAT) is a process that should be done by the business analyst after the software developers have delivered a completed solution and the quality assurance team has passed it. User acceptance testing is a process of verifying that the solution meets the requirements and expectations of the end users and delivers value to them. User acceptance testing involves preparing test cases, scenarios, or scripts based on the acceptance criteria, executing them with representative users or stakeholders, collecting feedback, identifying defects or issues, and obtaining sign-off or approval for deployment. User acceptance testing can help to ensure that the solution is fit for use, suitable for purpose, and aligned with business objectives. Evaluating the solution against the project charter is not necessary at this stage, as it does not involve testing or validation by the end users or stakeholders. Evaluating the solution with the sponsor(s) is not sufficient at this stage, as it does not capture the perspective of all relevant users or stakeholders who will use or benefit from the solution. Conducting performance testing is not relevant at this stage, as it is usually done by the quality assurance team before delivering the solution to ensure that it meets the non-functional requirements such as speed, reliability, scalability, etc. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

The best action to take to ensure the design meets customer requirements is to create a system requirements verification matrix to trace the design to the technical requirements and include verification methods. A system requirements verification matrix is a document that maps the design elements to the system requirements, and specifies the methods and criteria for verifying that the design satisfies the requirements. Verification methods can include inspection, analysis, demonstration, or testing. A system requirements verification matrix can help the business analyst and the project team to ensure the quality and completeness of the design, and to avoid any errors, gaps, or inconsistencies. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 100.

 Team peer review is a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Team peer review is a technique that involves having a group of peers or experts examine and evaluate the requirements for quality, completeness, correctness, clarity, consistency, and testability. Team peer review can help to identify any ambiguous or unverifiable requirements that may cause confusion, misunderstanding, or errors in the project. Team peer review can also provide feedback and suggestions for improvement or resolution of any issues or defects in the requirements. Fishbone analysis is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Fishbone analysis is a technique that is used to identify the root causes of a problem or an effect by analyzing its contributing factors and their relationships. Fishbone analysis can help to understand why a problem exists or why an effect occurs, but it does not directly examine or evaluate the quality of the requirements. Resource checklist is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Resource checklist is a tool that is used to identify and document the resources needed to perform business analysis activities, such as people, tools, facilities, equipment, etc. Resource checklist can help to plan and manage the resources required for business analysis work, but it does not assess or verify the quality of the requirements. Traceability matrix is not a technique that is used to identify ambiguous or unverifiable requirements. Traceability matrix is a tool that is used to track and document the relationships and dependencies among requirements and other project elements, such as design, test cases, risks, issues, etc. Traceability matrix can help to monitor and control changes to requirements and ensure alignment with project objectives and stakeholder needs, but it does not measure or validate the quality of the requirements. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 162-163; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 19-20.

 A strategies and goals analysis is a technique that helps to ensure that the projects are aligned with the organization’s vision, mission, values, and strategic objectives. A strategies and goals analysis helps to identify the business problems or opportunities that the projects are intended to address, and to evaluate the expected benefits and outcomes of the projects. A strategies and goals analysis also helps to prioritize and select the projects that have the highest potential to improve the company’s performance and profitability. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 40.

Functional specifications are a type of requirements documentation that describes what the system or product should do in terms of functions, features, behaviors, inputs, outputs, etc. Functional specifications can help the business analyst to document the requirements in a way that is clearly understood by the development team and provides enough information to check if the requirement has been met. Functional specifications can also include acceptance criteria, test cases, data models, user interface designs, etc. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 39.

 A properly written requirement statement should be clear, concise, consistent, complete, and testable. It should specify what the product or service should do, not how it should do it. It should also avoid using ambiguous or vague words that could be interpreted differently by different stakeholders. Among the four options, only option C meets these criteria. Option C is a properly written requirement statement because it clearly and precisely defines the attribute of the pot (the colors) and the possible values for that attribute (yellow, red, brown, blue). It is also consistent with the standard terminology and format for requirement statements, and it is complete and testable, as it can be verified by inspection or measurement. Option A is not a properly written requirement statement because it uses ambiguous and vague words such as “lightweight” and “heat up quickly”. These words do not specify the exact or measurable criteria for the pot’s weight and heating time, and they could mean different things to different stakeholders. Option B is not a properly written requirement statement because it does not specify the conditions or constraints for the pot’s usability in the oven or on the stove. For example, it does not state the maximum temperature or duration that the pot can withstand, or the type of oven or stove that the pot can be used on. Option D is not a properly written requirement statement because it does not specify the requirement for the pot itself, but rather for the company brand. The company brand is not a feature or function of the pot, but rather a marketing or branding strategy. The requirement statement should focus on the pot’s characteristics and capabilities, not on the company’s image or reputation. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, How To Write Good Requirements (With Example) - TestLodge Blog

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, one of the tasks under the domain of Traceability and Monitoring is to “Track the status, priority, and disposition of requirements and issues, and communicate updates as necessary” (Task 1). This implies that the business analyst is responsible for ensuring that the requirements are delivered as stated and that any changes or issues are communicated to the relevant stakeholders. One of the techniques that can be used to perform this task is the traceability matrix, which is a table that shows the relationships between requirements and other project artifacts, such as design documents, test cases, or deliverables. A traceability matrix can help the business analyst to verify that all the requirements are covered by the test cases and that the test output matches the expected results. Therefore, the technique that the business analyst could have used to ensure that requirements were delivered as stated is the traceability matrix.

 According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, the business analyst should recommend the option with the highest functionality score and the lowest cost score. In this case, option A, 1, Custom solution, has the highest functionality score of 10 and the lowest cost score of 1. Therefore, it should be recommended. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

 The business analyst would use brainstorming to identify stakeholders. Brainstorming is a technique that involves generating ideas or solutions through a group discussion or a creative thinking process. Brainstorming can help the business analyst to identify potential stakeholders who have an interest, influence, or impact on the project or the solution, and to solicit their input and feedback on the project requirements and expectations. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 38.

 A requirements traceability matrix (RTM) is a tool that helps to track the relationship between the requirements and the product features. It can be used to determine the scope of a change request by identifying which requirements and test cases are affected by the modification of an existing feature. A project schedule and cost baseline are not directly related to the product features, but rather to the project management aspects. A requirements attributes table is a tool that helps to classify and prioritize the requirements, but it does not show the link between the requirements and the product features. A sequence diagram is a tool that helps to illustrate the interactions between the components of the product, but it does not show the traceability of the requirements. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide

 A traceability matrix is a document that the business analyst can use to determine the relationship of each requirement to the business need when working on Project Y. A traceability matrix is a table that shows how each requirement relates to other project artifacts, such as business needs, objectives, deliverables, design elements, test cases, or risks. A traceability matrix can help to ensure that each requirement is aligned with and contributes to the business need that initiated the project. It can also help to verify that each requirement is necessary, feasible, testable, and traceable throughout the project life cycle. A traceability matrix can also help to manage changes and measure progress in relation to the business need. A requirements baseline document is a version of the requirements specification that has been reviewed, approved, and formally established as the basis for further development and delivery of the solution. A requirements baseline document defines the scope of the project and the expected value of the solution. It does not show how each requirement relates to the business need explicitly. A requirements management plan is a document that describes how requirements will be elicited, analyzed, documented, validated, and managed throughout the project. A requirements management plan defines the roles, responsibilities, processes, and tools for managing requirements. It does not indicate the relationship of each requirement to the business need specifically. A requirements package is a document that presents the requirements in a structured and organized way for communication and verification purposes. A requirements package may include different types of requirements, such as functional, non-functional, quality, or transition requirements. It does not demonstrate how each requirement relates to the business need directly. A reliability matrix is not a standard document in business analysis, but it may refer to a tool that measures the reliability or dependability of a system or a process. A reliability matrix evaluates the performance or quality of a solution. It does not determine the relationship of each requirement to the business need. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 95.

The first thing the business analyst should do immediately after the discussion with the project manager is to schedule time with the process owners. The process owners are the people or groups responsible for a specific business process or procedure that is affected by the project5. The business analyst needs to understand the current state of the processes, the pain points and opportunities, the requirements and expectations, and the impact of the project on the processes. By meeting with the process owners, the business analyst can establish a relationship, gather relevant information, and ensure alignment and collaboration. Putting the information into a project plan is premature, as the business analyst needs to conduct more analysis and planning before creating a project plan. Developing an issues log is not necessary, as there are no issues identified at this stage. Assessing the risks for the project is important, but it is not the immediate action, as the business analyst needs to understand the scope and objectives of the project first. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline2, PMI Guide to Business Analysis3, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, What is a Process Owner? Definition & Responsibilities

 A use case is a technique that describes how an actor interacts with a system to achieve a goal or perform a task. A use case consists of a main scenario and possible alternative scenarios that capture the normal, exceptional, and error flows of events. A use case can also include the acceptance criteria that specify the conditions that must be met for the use case to be successfully completed and accepted by the stakeholders. The test team can review the use cases to help identify the acceptance criteria for the solution, as they provide a comprehensive and realistic view of the expected behavior and outcomes of the system. The test team can also use the use cases to design and execute test cases that verify and validate the functional requirements and acceptance criteria of the solution. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 20; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 99.

Requirements management is a method for requirements change control. Requirements management is a process that involves planning, monitoring, and controlling the requirements and the solution throughout the project lifecycle. Requirements management can help the business analyst to ensure that the requirements are clear, complete, correct, and consistent, and that they align with the business needs and objectives. Requirements management can also help to handle changes to the requirements and the solution, and to communicate the impact and implications of the changes to the stakeholders. Requirements management can be done using various tools and techniques, such as a requirements management plan, a requirements traceability matrix, a change control system, and a configuration management system52. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 133.

 The type of requirements that do not trace to a business need are out-of-scope requirements. Out-of-scope requirements are the requirements that are not related to the project scope, objectives, or deliverables, and that do not contribute to the solution of the business problem or opportunity. Out-of-scope requirements are usually identified and excluded during the requirements analysis and traceability processes, to avoid wasting time, resources, and effort on unnecessary or irrelevant features or functions. Out-of-scope requirements can be caused by various factors, such as unclear or changing business needs, conflicting or unrealistic stakeholder expectations, poor communication or elicitation techniques, or lack of validation or verification methods. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

 A feasibility study is a technique that involves evaluating the viability and suitability of a proposed project or solution. A feasibility study can help the business analyst to define the scope of this project by assessing the technical, economic, legal, operational, and schedule aspects of designing and building three bridges within a limited time frame. A feasibility study can also help to identify the risks, benefits, costs, and assumptions associated with each bridge project. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 52.

Communication is an essential part of requirements management, as it ensures that the requirements are clear, consistent, and agreed upon by all the project stakeholders. Stakeholders are the individuals or groups who have an interest or influence in the project, and who can provide input, feedback, and approval for the requirements. Communication also helps to avoid surprises, misunderstandings, and conflicts among the stakeholders, and to manage their expectations and satisfaction. Communication should be timely, accurate, relevant, and transparent, and should follow the communication plan and strategy defined in the requirements management plan12.

One of the aspects of communication is the status of the requirements, which indicates the progress and completion of the requirements throughout the project life cycle. The status of the requirements can be tracked and documented using a traceability matrix, which is a tool that links the requirements to their sources and traces them throughout the project. The status of the requirements can also be monitored and controlled using a change control process, which is a process that evaluates, approves, and implements any changes to the requirements. The status of the requirements can have different values, such as proposed, approved, implemented, verified, deferred, deleted, or rejected12.

When the status of a requirement changes, it should be communicated to all the project stakeholders, not just the source of the requirement or the project team. This is because the change in the status of a requirement may have an impact on the scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risk of the project, and may affect the interests or expectations of the stakeholders. Communicating the status of the requirements to all the project stakeholders helps to keep them informed and engaged, and to obtain their feedback and approval. It also helps to prevent surprises, such as the one experienced by the major stakeholder in the question, who was unaware that a particular requirement was deferred12.

Therefore, the best option is C. The status should have been communicated to all project stakeholders. Option A is not the best option, because the status should have been communicated to more than just the requirement’s source. Option B is not the best option, because the status should have been communicated earlier than prior to project launch. Option D is not the best option, because updating the status in the traceability matrix is not enough, as the stakeholders may not have access to or awareness of the matrix. References: 1 PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9-11; 2 Requirements Management 101 | Smartsheet 2

 Moscow analysis is a tool or technique that the business analyst can use with the stakeholders to prioritize the requirements to determine which requirements are approved, deferred, or rejected. Moscow analysis is a method of categorizing requirements into four groups: must-have, should-have, could-have, and won’t-have. Must-have requirements are essential and non-negotiable for the project success. Should-have requirements are important but not critical for the project success. Could-have requirements are desirable but not necessary for the project success. Won’t-have requirements are out of scope or low priority for the current project. Moscow analysis can help to identify the most valuable and feasible requirements that can be delivered within the available time and budget. It can also help to manage stakeholder expectations and resolve conflicts or disagreements on the priority of the requirements. SMART goals is a tool or technique that can be used to define clear and measurable objectives for a project or a process, but it does not help to prioritize the requirements. SMART goals are specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. SWOT analysis is a tool or technique that can be used to assess the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of a project or a process, but it does not help to prioritize the requirements. SWOT analysis can help to identify the internal and external factors that affect the project or process performance and quality. Timeboxing analysis is not a standard tool or technique in business analysis, but it may refer to a method of allocating a fixed amount of time for each task or activity in a project or a process, but it does not help to prioritize the requirements. Timeboxing analysis can help to manage time and resources efficiently and effectively. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 15; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 95.

 Inspection is a technique or tool that is used to obtain acceptance of the delivered product. Inspection is a process that involves examining and measuring the product or its components against the predefined standards, criteria, or specifications, to determine its quality, completeness, and correctness. Inspection can help the business analyst and the project team to identify and correct any defects, errors, or deviations in the product, and to ensure that it meets the requirements and the stakeholder expectations. Inspection can also help to obtain the formal approval and acceptance of the product from the customer and other stakeholders, and to confirm that the product is ready for delivery or deployment. Inspection can be done using various methods, such as reviews, walkthroughs, audits, or tests. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 21; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 101.

 A force-field analysis is a tool that helps to identify and analyze the factors or forces that support or oppose a change or an initiative. It can help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative by showing the pros and cons of the initiative, as well as the relative strength and importance of each factor. A force-field analysis can also help to develop strategies to increase the supporting forces or decrease the opposing forces, or both, to achieve the desired outcome. A PEST analysis is a tool that helps to examine the external factors that affect an organization or an initiative, such as political, economic, social, and technological factors. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the internal factors or the balance of forces. A feasibility analysis is a tool that helps to evaluate the viability and suitability of a project or an initiative, as well as the risks and benefits associated with it. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the supporting and opposing forces. A gap analysis is a tool that helps to compare the current state and the desired state of a process, a product, or a service, and identify the gaps or differences between them. It does not help to facilitate the decision-making process when stakeholders do not agree on the value of an initiative, as it does not show the factors or forces that influence the initiative. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide3, What is Force Field Analysis: Definition and Example

 MoSCoW is a requirements prioritization method that classifies requirements into four categories: Must have, Should have, Could have, and Won’t have. This method helps the business analyst and the stakeholders to agree on the essential requirements that must be delivered within a fixed time frame, and the desirable requirements that can be deferred or dropped if necessary. MoSCoW is suitable for this project because it allows the business analyst to focus on the minimum viable product that meets the business need of replacing the current enrollment and billing software application before the vendor contract ends, and to cope with the large volume of requirements by prioritizing them based on their value and urgency. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 92.

The business case provides the rationale for the project and includes an analysis of the costs and benefits. It is used to assess risks, including the potential need to cancel the product. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide.

Requesting information on the current ordering process and comparing it with other companies is a technique that involves gathering data and benchmarking best practices from similar or relevant sources. Requesting information on the current ordering process and comparing it with other companies can help the business analyst to take the next step after completing the requirements by analyzing the current state of the problem, identifying gaps or opportunities for improvement, and proposing possible solutions or alternatives. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 12; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 69.

 Plurality is the decision role that was used by the project team to decide which requirements will be included in the next release. Plurality means that the option with the most votes is selected, even if it does not have a majority (more than 50%) of the votes. Plurality is a decision role that can be used when there are more than two options and a quick decision is needed. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, Chapter 4, Section 4.3.2.4; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain II: Planning, Task 3.

The business analyst should communicate that the status of this requirement has changed to the relevant stakeholders, such as the project manager, the sponsor, the development team, and the quality assurance team. Communication is an essential skill for business analysts, as it helps to ensure that everyone involved in the project is aware of the current state of the requirements, the rationale behind any changes, and the impact of those changes on the project scope, schedule, budget, quality, and risks. Communication also helps to manage stakeholder expectations and avoid confusion or conflicts. Bringing the subsequent project to the change control board (CCB) is not necessary at this stage, as the requirement has been deferred and not added to another project. Asking the stakeholders to review the requirement before any other action is taken is not effective, as the requirement cannot be implemented until the needed information is available. Marking the requirement as complete so that it is not forgotten is incorrect, as it does not reflect the true status of the requirement and may cause errors or inconsistencies in the requirements documentation and traceability. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 77.

Requirements baseline is a document that contains the approved version of the requirements that serves as a reference point for further changes. Requirements baseline can help the business analyst to address the issue of underestimating the required budget and schedule by defining the scope, value, quality, risk, and feasibility of each requirement. Requirements baseline can also help to negotiate the scope in the contract with the customer by showing how each requirement aligns with their needs and expectations, and proposing possible trade-offs or alternatives. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 40.

One of the main purposes for creating a requirements traceability matrix is to track how requirements can be connected to the solution. A requirements traceability matrix is a tool that links the requirements to the project scope, objectives, deliverables, and test cases. A requirements traceability matrix can help the business analyst to track the origin, allocation, dependencies, and status of the requirements throughout the project lifecycle, and to ensure that the solution meets the requirements and the stakeholder expectations. A requirements traceability matrix can also help to manage changes, resolve issues, and measure the quality and performance of the solution. A requirements traceability matrix can be created using various formats, such as a table, a spreadsheet, or a database12. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline3, page 18; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide4, page 92.

According to the PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content, a critical design review is a formal review that occurs after the completion of the design phase of a project. The purpose of a critical design review is to verify that the design specification meets the requirements and that the solution is feasible, cost-effective, and acceptable to the customer. A critical design review can help to establish an approved requirements baseline, which is a set of agreed-upon requirements that serves as a reference for further development and testing activities. References:

PMI Professional in Business Analysis objectives and content: PMI-PBA Certification

PMI Professional in Business Analysis reference list: PBA Reference List

PMI Professional in Business Analysis study guide: PMI.com

 The business analyst must perform a cost-benefit analysis in order to complete the business case and arrive at a solid recommendation. A cost-benefit analysis is a technique that compares the costs and benefits of different options or alternatives for solving a business problem or achieving a business opportunity. A cost-benefit analysis helps to evaluate the return on investment (ROI), the net present value (NPV), and the payback period of each option, and to select the most optimal one based on the business value and the strategic alignment. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 10; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 40.

External dependencies are the factors or conditions that are outside the control of the project, but may affect its scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risks. External dependencies may include legal, regulatory, cultural, environmental, political, economic, or technological factors. An organization that is evaluating the possibility of conducting business internationally should investigate these factors at the onset of the initiative, as they may have significant impacts on the feasibility, viability, and desirability of the project. The other options are not factors that should be investigated at the onset of the initiative. Deliverables to be produced are the outputs or results of the project that meet the stakeholder requirements. Impacts on requirements baseline are the changes or deviations from the approved set of requirements that define the solution scope. Change control processes are the procedures and tools that manage how changes to the project scope, schedule, cost, quality, or risks are identified, evaluated, approved, implemented, and communicated. These factors are determined or addressed during the planning or execution phases of the project, not at the onset of the initiative. References: PMI-PBA® Examination Content Outline, page 13; PMI-PBA® Reference List, page 1, BABOK® Guide v3, page 39; 4.

 A closed-ended survey using the Likert scale is a type of survey that asks respondents to indicate their level of agreement or disagreement with a series of statements related to the current business process. This type of survey is useful for gathering data that can be used in a statistical analysis to measure user satisfaction, identify pain points, and evaluate the performance of the current business process. A closed-ended survey is also easier to administer and analyze than an open-ended survey, which requires more time and effort to code and interpret the responses. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 17; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 91.

 Phased baselining is an approach that involves dividing the requirements into smaller subsets or increments that can be approved, developed, and delivered separately. Phased baselining can help to cope with the requirements’ volatility, as it allows the business analyst and the stakeholders to accommodate changes and feedback in each increment, and to adjust the scope and priorities of the subsequent increments accordingly. Phased baselining can also reduce the risk and uncertainty of the project, as it enables early validation and verification of the solution, and provides more flexibility and adaptability to the changing business environment and regulations. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, user acceptance testing is a technique that involves verifying and validating that the solution meets the business requirements and satisfies the stakeholder needs and expectations. User acceptance testing is usually performed by the end users or their representatives, who evaluate the solution against predefined acceptance criteria and provide feedback on its functionality, usability, performance, quality, etc. User acceptance testing can help to determine whether a solution satisfies business requirements, as it can demonstrate that the solution delivers the intended business value and benefits, and that it meets or exceeds the stakeholder satisfaction. By reviewing the results of user acceptance testing, a business analyst can assess how well the solution meets business requirements, and identify any gaps or issues that need to be addressed or resolved. Evaluating the solution against the project charter, conducting a brainstorming session with end users, or reviewing the traceability matrix are other ways to analyze and validate requirements, but they do not necessarily determine whether a solution satisfies business requirements, as they do not involve testing or evaluating the solution in real or simulated conditions. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 317-318.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a context diagram is a model that shows the boundaries of an area of analysis, such as a project, a system, a process, or an organization. A context diagram depicts the main entities or actors involved in the area of analysis, and the interactions or data flows between them. A context diagram can help to ensure the most effective representation of analysis boundary, as it provides a high-level overview of the scope and context of the area of analysis, and helps to identify the key stakeholders and their relationships. A context diagram can also help to communicate and validate the scope and context with the stakeholders, and to identify any assumptions or risks related to the area of analysis. A data flow diagram, a state diagram, and an entity relationship diagram are other models that can help to analyze an area of analysis, but they do not necessarily show the boundary or scope of it. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 158-159.

The purpose of reviewing the system use cases and screen mockups with the client team is to validate that the system is aligned with the stakeholder requirements. Validation is a process of ensuring that the solution meets the needs and expectations of the stakeholders and delivers value to them. Validation involves checking whether the solution is feasible, acceptable, complete, correct, consistent, and testable. By walking through the artifacts with the client team, the business analyst can obtain feedback, confirm understanding, identify gaps or errors, and resolve issues. Verifying that the documents are aligned with the transition requirements or the solution requirements are possible outcomes of the review meeting, but they are not the main purpose. Verifying that the system is aligned with the quality requirements is not relevant to this scenario, as quality requirements are related to how well the solution performs rather than what it does. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 13; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 76.

 Value-ranking criteria are a set of factors or measures that are used to evaluate and prioritize the value of backlog items. Value-ranking criteria can include business objectives, benefits, costs, risks, dependencies, urgency, etc. The stakeholders follow the value-ranking criteria to determine the value of backlog items based on their alignment with the project vision and goals. The stakeholders can also use techniques such as MoSCoW analysis or weighted ranking matrix to apply the value-ranking criteria. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 11; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 66.

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a use case is a technique that describes how an actor interacts with a system or a process to achieve a specific goal. A use case can help to prevent problems from occurring in the implementation of a new application, as it can capture the functional requirements and the expected behavior of the system or the process, as well as the exceptions and alternative flows. A use case can also help to design and execute test cases that cover all the possible scenarios and outcomes. In this case, a use case could have prevented the problem of a worker using a field that was not supposed to be used, as it could have specified the valid inputs and outputs for the report, and the actions and responses of the system or the process. Prototyping, diagrams, and document analysis are other techniques that can help to analyze and communicate requirements, but they do not necessarily prevent problems from occurring in the implementation of a new application, as they do not describe the interactions and outcomes of the system or the process in detail. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 165-166.

 Stakeholder analysis is a process of identifying and analyzing the stakeholders who have an interest or influence on the project and its outcomes. Stakeholder analysis helps to ensure that the requirements are elicited from all relevant sources and that the stakeholders are appropriately engaged throughout the project. By identifying the user from a department that did not participate in the requirements analysis as a stakeholder, the business analyst could have avoided the situation of logging a defect during user acceptance testing and minimized the impact on the project. Interviewing the user to understand how the user’s work would be impacted, involving the user in the development and sign-off of the business requirements, and giving the user the opportunity to review the user acceptance test scripts are possible actions that could be taken after identifying the user as a stakeholder, but they are not sufficient to avoid the situation and minimize the impact on the project. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 9; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 55.

 A user survey is a technique that can be used to determine how well the solution meets the business case. A user survey is a method of collecting feedback from the end users of the solution about their satisfaction, preferences, expectations, needs, problems, or suggestions. A user survey can help to measure the performance, quality, usability, and value of the solution and compare it with the expected benefits and outcomes defined in the business case. A user survey can also help to identify areas for improvement or enhancement of the solution. Asking the sponsor for feedback is not sufficient to determine how well the solution meets the business case, as it does not capture the perspective of the end users who are directly affected by the solution. Surveying the project is not relevant to this scenario, as it does not focus on the solution but rather on the project management processes and practices. Comparing the results of day-in-the-life (DITL) testing and integration testing is not effective, as it does not reflect the actual usage and experience of the solution by the end users after deployment. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 80.

According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, a data dictionary is a tool that defines and describes the data elements and their attributes in a consistent and standardized way. A data dictionary can help to minimize the risk of misunderstanding or misinterpreting data items mentioned in the requirements documents, as it provides a common language and reference for all stakeholders involved in the project. A data dictionary can also help to ensure the quality, accuracy, and completeness of the data requirements. Planning a peer review, asking for a formal acceptance, or holding a workshop are other ways to improve the clarity and understanding of the requirements specification, but they do not address the specific issue of defining and describing the data items. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 169-170.

A configuration management system is a tool that can be used to trace the large number of requirements that will be generated by this project. A configuration management system is a system that consists of the processes, procedures, tools, and databases that are used to manage and control the configuration items of the project. A configuration item is any component of the project that has a defined and approved version, such as a requirement, a deliverable, a document, a model, a test case, etc. A configuration management system can help the business analyst and the project team to record, track, update, and maintain the configuration items throughout the project lifecycle, and to ensure their consistency, integrity, and traceability. A configuration management system can also help to handle changes, resolve issues, and measure the quality and performance of the project. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 24; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 133.

Root cause analysis is a technique that involves identifying and analyzing the underlying causes of a problem or an issue. Root cause analysis can help the business analyst to determine how the selection criteria requirement was missed, and to prevent similar errors from occurring in the future. Root cause analysis can be done using various tools, such as fishbone diagram and the Five Whys. A fishbone diagram is a graphical tool that organizes the possible causes of a problem into categories, such as people, process, technology, environment, etc. A fishbone diagram can help the business analyst to visualize the relationships between the causes and the effects, and to identify the most likely root causes. The Five Whys is a questioning technique that involves asking “why” repeatedly until the root cause of a problem is revealed. The Five Whys can help the business analyst to drill down into the details of the problem, and to uncover the underlying factors and assumptions that led to the missed requirement. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, page 21; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide2, page 101.

The requirements approval process is documented as a measure of effective decision making that allows the business analyst to finalize the process for requirement approval. The requirements approval process defines the roles, responsibilities, criteria, methods, and tools for approving the requirements and ensuring that they meet the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements approval process should be agreed upon by the stakeholders and the business analyst before the requirements are elicited, analyzed, and validated. The requirements verification process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for ensuring that the requirements are complete, correct, consistent, and clear. The requirements elicitation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a set of activities for discovering, gathering, and understanding the stakeholder needs and expectations. The requirements validation process is not a measure of effective decision making, but a technique for confirming that the requirements align with the business objectives and deliver value to the stakeholders. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 113-114 1; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 17 2.

 According to the PMI Guide to Business Analysis, planning the requirements change process involves defining how requirement changes will be identified, analyzed, approved, and communicated throughout the project life cycle. Communication is a key aspect of managing requirement changes, as it ensures that all stakeholders are aware of the status, impact, and rationale of the changes, and that they can provide their feedback and input. How requirement changes will impact the requirements baseline, how they will be implemented, and how they will impact the validation plan are all important considerations, but they are not part of planning the requirements change process. They are part of executing, monitoring, and controlling the requirements change process. References: PMI Guide to Business Analysis, page 286-287.

 A customer metrics tool is a tool that measures the satisfaction, loyalty, retention, and advocacy of customers. It helps to evaluate the performance and quality of the products or services offered by a company, as well as the effectiveness of the customer service and support. A customer metrics tool can also provide insights into the needs, preferences, expectations, and feedback of customers, which can help to improve the customer experience and increase customer retention and referrals. Some examples of customer metrics tools are12:

Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT): This tool measures how satisfied customers are with a specific product, service, or interaction. It typically uses a scale of 1 to 5 or 1 to 10, where higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. CSAT can be used to assess the overall satisfaction of customers, or to focus on specific aspects, such as ease of use, quality, or speed.

Customer Effort Score (CES): This tool measures how easy or difficult it is for customers to complete a task, such as placing an order, resolving an issue, or finding information. It usually uses a scale of 1 to 7, where lower scores indicate lower effort. CES can be used to identify and eliminate the pain points and friction that customers encounter, and to enhance the customer experience and loyalty.

Net Promoter Score (NPS): This tool measures how likely customers are to recommend a product, service, or company to others. It uses a scale of 0 to 10, where customers are classified as detractors (0-6), passives (7-8), or promoters (9-10). NPS can be used to gauge the loyalty and advocacy of customers, and to calculate the growth potential and profitability of a company.

Churn Rate: This tool measures the percentage of customers who stop using a product or service within a given period of time. It can be calculated by dividing the number of customers who left by the total number of customers at the beginning of the period. Churn rate can be used to monitor the retention and attrition of customers, and to identify the reasons and factors that cause customers to leave.

Customer Lifetime Value (CLV): This tool measures the total revenue or profit that a customer generates for a company over their entire relationship. It can be calculated by multiplying the average purchase value by the average purchase frequency, and then multiplying the result by the average customer lifespan. CLV can be used to estimate the value and profitability of each customer, and to allocate resources and strategies accordingly.

A focus group is not a metrics tool, but rather a research method that involves a small group of customers who share their opinions and experiences about a product, service, or topic. A focus group can provide qualitative data and insights, but not quantitative measurements. A business completion metrics tool is a tool that measures the percentage of customers who complete a desired action, such as signing up, purchasing, or renewing. It can be used to evaluate the conversion and retention rates of customers, and to optimize the customer journey and funnel. A sales and marketing metrics tool is a tool that measures the performance and effectiveness of the sales and marketing activities and campaigns of a company. It can be used to track and analyze the sales and marketing goals, strategies, and outcomes, and to improve the sales and marketing efficiency and ROI. References: 1 The Top 5 Customer Satisfaction Metrics You Need to Track; 2 Customer Satisfaction Metrics: 7 Best Metrics to Measure

A requirements traceability matrix (RTM) is a tool that helps to track the relationship between the requirements and the product features, test cases, and other artifacts. It can be used to ensure that all requirements have been met by verifying that each requirement has a corresponding feature, test case, and acceptance criterion. A RTM can also help to identify the risks associated with dependent requirements, but that is not its primary purpose. A RTM does not define a convention to map the requirements to their sources, but rather uses an existing convention or standard. A RTM does not address the responsibility owner for each requirement, but rather shows the status and priority of each requirement. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline1, PMI Guide to Business Analysis2, Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide

 A traceability matrix is a document that links requirements to their sources and traces them throughout the project life cycle. It helps to track changes in requirements, assess their impact, and ensure that they are met by the project deliverables. A traceability matrix is a useful tool for document control, as it records the version history of each requirement and the rationale for any changes. A statement of work, a project plan, and a problem or opportunity statement are not methods of document control, but rather documents that describe the project scope, objectives, activities, and justification. References: PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, page 9 1; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide, page 121 2

 A change-driven approach is the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A change-driven approach is an adaptive and iterative approach that embraces changes and feedback throughout the project lifecycle. It allows the organization to explore different options and alternatives for the solution and deliver value incrementally and frequently. A change-driven approach is suitable for projects that have high uncertainty, complexity, or volatility in the requirements or the environment. A plan-driven approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A plan-driven approach is a predictive and sequential approach that follows a detailed plan and minimizes changes and deviations from the baseline. It requires the organization to have a clear and stable vision of the solution and deliver value at the end of the project. A plan-driven approach is suitable for projects that have low uncertainty, complexity, or volatility in the requirements or the environment. A waterfall approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. A waterfall approach is a type of plan-driven approach that divides the project into distinct phases and completes each phase before moving to the next one. It does not allow for any changes or revisions once a phase is completed. A waterfall approach is suitable for projects that have very simple, well-defined, and fixed requirements and solutions. An analytical approach is not the approach that best aligns with the business need for an organization that prefers taking an exploratory approach to finding the solution that best meets the business need. An analytical approach is a technique or a method for solving problems or making decisions based on data, logic, and reasoning. It does not refer to a specific project management or business analysis approach. References: Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide 1, page 28-29; PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline 2, page 13.

 Agile is an approach to enable developers and product owners to be in constant communication so that changes or issues that occur during development are exposed and discussed as they develop. Agile emphasizes iterative and incremental delivery of value, collaboration, feedback, and adaptation. Agile methods include Scrum, Kanban, XP, and others. References: = PMI Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline (2019), page 14; Business Analysis for Practitioners: A Practice Guide (2015), page 17.