The demonstrated capacity last week is the total number of models completed by both modelers in 40 hours. One modeler finished 5 models a day, which means 25 models in a week. The other modeler finished 1 model a day, which means 5 models in a week. Therefore, the demonstrated capacity last week is 25 + 5 = 30 models. However, this is not one of the options given. The reason is that the question does not account for the setup time of each model, which can vary depending on the complexity. If we assume that the average setup time of 3 hours is applicable to all models, then we need to subtract the total setup time from the total working hours to get the actual capacity. The total setup time for 30 models is 30 x 3 = 90 hours. The total working hours for both modelers is 2 x 40 = 80 hours. Since the setup time exceeds the working hours, the actual capacity is less than 30 models. To find the actual capacity, we need to solve the following equation:

80 = x * 3 + x * 1

where x is the number of models completed. Simplifying the equation, we get:

x = 10

Therefore, the actual capacity is 10 models, which is option C. References:

Managing Supply Chain Operations, Chapter 6: Capacity Management, Section 6.1: Capacity Concepts, Subsection 6.1.1: Capacity Definitions

CPIM Exam Content Manual, Module 4: Supply, Section 4.2: Capacity Management, Subsection 4.2.1: Capacity Concepts

A cellular layout is a workplace organization in which processes are organized by the product or product family, rather than by the type of work (function). A cellular layout consists of cells, which are groups of machines or workstations that are located close to each other and perform all the operations required for a product or product family. A cellular layout has several advantages over a functional layout, such as reduced material handling, improved quality, increased flexibility, and enhanced employee involvement. One of the main benefits of a cellular layout is that products will have faster throughput. Throughput is the rate at which products are produced and delivered to the customers. A cellular layout can increase the throughput by reducing the travel distance, the waiting time, and the setup time for the products. A cellular layout can also improve the production flow, the synchronization, and the visibility of the products. The other options are not correct, as they are not the typical benefits of switching from a functional to a cellular layout, but rather possible drawbacks or trade-offs of switching from a functional to a cellular layout:

Equipment utilization will be higher: This is unlikely to be true, as a cellular layout may result in lower equipment utilization than a functional layout. Equipment utilization is the ratio of the actual output of a machine to its maximum possible output. A cellular layout may reduce the equipment utilization by dedicating some machines to specific products or product families, which may limit the sharing of machines across different products or product families. A cellular layout may also reduce the equipment utilization by balancing the workload among the machines within a cell, which may prevent some machines from operating at their full capacity.

Quality inspections will be reduced: This may or may not be true, depending on the quality level and the quality control system of the production process. A cellular layout may reduce the quality inspections by improving the quality of the products, as the workers in a cell are more responsible, skilled, and empowered to perform the operations and to detect and correct the defects. However, a cellular layout may also increase the quality inspections by requiring more frequent and rigorous checks of the products, as the products move from one cell to another or from one stage to another.

Capital expenditures will be reduced: This is unlikely to be true, as a cellular layout may result in higher capital expenditures than a functional layout. Capital expenditures are the costs of acquiring or upgrading the fixed assets, such as machines, equipment, or facilities. A cellular layout may increase the capital expenditures by requiring more machines or equipment to create the cells, especially if the machines or equipment are specialized or customized for specific products or product families. A cellular layout may also increase the capital expenditures by requiring more space or facilities to accommodate the cells, especially if the cells are dispersed or isolated from each other. References:

[CPIM Part 2 - Section B - Topic 4 - Sustainability]

Cellular Manufacturing: Definition, Examples & Advantages — Katana

Cellular or Functional Layout? - IGI Global

Functional Layout - Velaction

What is cell layout? - Studybuff.com

Product price is most effective in influencing demand in the introduction phase of the product life cycle, when the product is new and unfamiliar to the market. In this phase, customers are not aware of the product’s benefits, features, or quality, and may be reluctant to try it. Therefore, a lower price can help attract customers and stimulate demand, as well as deter potential competitors from entering the market. A lower price can also help the product gain market share and establish a loyal customer base. As the product moves to the growth, maturity, and decline phases, price becomes less effective in influencing demand, as other factors, such as product differentiation, quality, promotion, and customer satisfaction, become more important. References:

•Product Life Cycle Explained: Stage and Examples

•The 6 Stages of the Product Life Cycle [+Examples]

•Product Life Cycle - Definition, Stages, Usage

The mean time between failures (MTBF) is the inverse of the failure rate. The failure rate is given as 0.00055 failures per hour, so the MTBF is 1/0.00055 = 1,818.2 hours. This means that the average time the machine operates without failing is 1,818.2 hours. References: MTBF Formula | How to Calculate Mean Time Between Failure? - EDUCBA, Mean time between failures - Wikipedia

Sales and Operations Planning (S & OP) is the proper forum for evaluating cross-functional impacts of a change in demand, including capacity, supply, and financial implications. Executive-level S & OP meetings align demand and supply decisions and ensure that changes in strategic direction are reviewed and approved.

“The S & OP executive meeting is where demand and supply plans are balanced and decisions are made on resource changes or market actions.”

— CPIM SMR Module, S & OP Function and Governance